The impact of extended adjuvant temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

IF 3.1 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ehsan Alimohammadi, Seyed Reza Bagheri, Shahram Taheri, Maliheh Dayani, Alireza Abdi
{"title":"The impact of extended adjuvant temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: a meta-analysis and systematic review.","authors":"Ehsan Alimohammadi,&nbsp;Seyed Reza Bagheri,&nbsp;Shahram Taheri,&nbsp;Maliheh Dayani,&nbsp;Alireza Abdi","doi":"10.4081/oncol.2020.461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical resection followed by concurrent radiation therapy and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy is the current standard treatment for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The present metaanalysis investigated the impact of prolonged TMZ maintenance therapy (more than 6 cycles) in comparison with standard TMZ maintenance therapy (exactly six cycles) on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with GBM. A meta-analysis of the literature was conducted using Medline, PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Seven articles involving 1018 patients were included. The overall survival was higher in the case group (>6 cycles TMZ) compared to the control group (6 cycles TMZ) (Z=2.375, P=0.018). The lower and upper limits were between 1.002-10.467 months. The case group had higher progression-free survival compared with the control group (Z=3.84; P<0.001). The lower and upper limits were between 2.559-7.894 months. Evidence from this meta-analysis suggests that prolonged TMZ therapy compared to the standard 6-cycle TMZ therapy was associated with higher survival in patients with glioblastoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":19487,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4081/oncol.2020.461","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/oncol.2020.461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Surgical resection followed by concurrent radiation therapy and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy is the current standard treatment for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The present metaanalysis investigated the impact of prolonged TMZ maintenance therapy (more than 6 cycles) in comparison with standard TMZ maintenance therapy (exactly six cycles) on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with GBM. A meta-analysis of the literature was conducted using Medline, PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Seven articles involving 1018 patients were included. The overall survival was higher in the case group (>6 cycles TMZ) compared to the control group (6 cycles TMZ) (Z=2.375, P=0.018). The lower and upper limits were between 1.002-10.467 months. The case group had higher progression-free survival compared with the control group (Z=3.84; P<0.001). The lower and upper limits were between 2.559-7.894 months. Evidence from this meta-analysis suggests that prolonged TMZ therapy compared to the standard 6-cycle TMZ therapy was associated with higher survival in patients with glioblastoma.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

替莫唑胺延长辅助治疗对新诊断的多形性胶质母细胞瘤的影响:荟萃分析和系统评价。
手术切除后同步放疗和替莫唑胺(TMZ)化疗是目前多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的标准治疗方法。本荟萃分析调查了延长TMZ维持治疗(超过6个周期)与标准TMZ维持治疗(正好6个周期)对GBM患者总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的影响。根据PRISMA指南,使用Medline、PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆对文献进行荟萃分析。纳入7篇文章,共1018例患者。病例组(>6个TMZ周期)的总生存率高于对照组(6个TMZ周期)(Z=2.375, P=0.018)。上下限为1.002 ~ 10.467个月。病例组的无进展生存期高于对照组(Z=3.84;P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology Reviews
Oncology Reviews ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Oncology Reviews is a quarterly peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes authoritative state-of-the-art reviews on preclinical and clinical aspects of oncology. The journal will provide up-to-date information on the latest achievements in different fields of oncology for both practising clinicians and basic researchers. Oncology Reviews aims at being international in scope and readership, as reflected also by its Editorial Board, gathering the world leading experts in both pre-clinical research and everyday clinical practice. The journal is open for publication of supplements, monothematic issues and for publishing abstracts of scientific meetings; conditions can be obtained from the Editor-in-Chief or the publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信