Effects of husbandry systems and Chinese indigenous chicken strain on cecum microbial diversity.

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences Pub Date : 2020-10-01 Epub Date: 2019-10-21 DOI:10.5713/ajas.19.0157
Xiuxue Dong, Bing Hu, Wenlong Wan, Yanzhang Gong, Yanping Feng
{"title":"Effects of husbandry systems and Chinese indigenous chicken strain on cecum microbial diversity.","authors":"Xiuxue Dong,&nbsp;Bing Hu,&nbsp;Wenlong Wan,&nbsp;Yanzhang Gong,&nbsp;Yanping Feng","doi":"10.5713/ajas.19.0157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was to evaluate the effect of husbandry systems and strains on cecum microbial diversity of Jingyang chickens under the same dietary conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 320 laying hens (body weight, 1.70±0.15 kg; 47 weeks old) were randomly allocated to one of the four treatments: i) Silver-feathered hens in enrichment cages (SEC) with an individual cage (70×60×75 cm), ii) Silver-feathered hens in free range (SFR) with the stocking density of 1.5 chickens per ten square meters, iii) Gold-feathered hens in enrichment cages (GEC), iv) Gold-feathered hens in free range (GFR). The experiment lasted 8 weeks and the cecum fecal samples were collected for 16S rDNA high throughput sequencing at the end of experiment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>i) The core microbiota was composed of Bacteroidetes (49% to 60%), Firmicutes (21% to 32%) and Proteobacteria (2% to 4%) at the phylum level. ii) The core bacteria were Bacteroides (26% to 31%), Rikenellaceae (9% to 16%), Parabacteroides (2% to 5%) and Lachnoclostridium (2% to 6%) at the genus level. iii) The indexes of operational taxonomic unit, Shannon, Simpson and observed species were all higher in SFR group than in SEC group while in GEC group than in GFR group, with SFR group showing the greatest diversity of cecum microorganisms among the four groups. iv) The clustering result was consistent with the strain classification, with a similar composition of cecum bacteria in the two strains of laying hens.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The core microbiota were not altered by husbandry systems or strains. The free-range system increased the diversity of cecal microbes only for silver feathered hens. However, the cecum microbial composition was similar in two strain treatments under the same dietary conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8558,"journal":{"name":"Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463085/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: This study was to evaluate the effect of husbandry systems and strains on cecum microbial diversity of Jingyang chickens under the same dietary conditions.

Methods: A total of 320 laying hens (body weight, 1.70±0.15 kg; 47 weeks old) were randomly allocated to one of the four treatments: i) Silver-feathered hens in enrichment cages (SEC) with an individual cage (70×60×75 cm), ii) Silver-feathered hens in free range (SFR) with the stocking density of 1.5 chickens per ten square meters, iii) Gold-feathered hens in enrichment cages (GEC), iv) Gold-feathered hens in free range (GFR). The experiment lasted 8 weeks and the cecum fecal samples were collected for 16S rDNA high throughput sequencing at the end of experiment.

Results: i) The core microbiota was composed of Bacteroidetes (49% to 60%), Firmicutes (21% to 32%) and Proteobacteria (2% to 4%) at the phylum level. ii) The core bacteria were Bacteroides (26% to 31%), Rikenellaceae (9% to 16%), Parabacteroides (2% to 5%) and Lachnoclostridium (2% to 6%) at the genus level. iii) The indexes of operational taxonomic unit, Shannon, Simpson and observed species were all higher in SFR group than in SEC group while in GEC group than in GFR group, with SFR group showing the greatest diversity of cecum microorganisms among the four groups. iv) The clustering result was consistent with the strain classification, with a similar composition of cecum bacteria in the two strains of laying hens.

Conclusion: The core microbiota were not altered by husbandry systems or strains. The free-range system increased the diversity of cecal microbes only for silver feathered hens. However, the cecum microbial composition was similar in two strain treatments under the same dietary conditions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

饲养制度和中国地方鸡品系对盲肠微生物多样性的影响。
目的:研究相同饲粮条件下不同饲养制度和菌株对京阳鸡盲肠微生物多样性的影响。方法:选取320只蛋鸡(体重1.70±0.15 kg;将47周龄的雏鸡随机分配到4个处理中:1)富集笼(SEC)中的银羽鸡,单个笼(70×60×75 cm), 2)放养银羽鸡(SFR),放养密度为1.5只/ 10平方米,3)富集笼(GEC)中的金羽鸡,4)自由放养的金羽鸡(GFR)。实验持续8周,实验结束时采集盲肠粪便样本进行16S rDNA高通量测序。结果:i)核心菌群在门水平上由拟杆菌门(49% ~ 60%)、厚壁菌门(21% ~ 32%)和变形菌门(2% ~ 4%)组成。ii)核心菌属为拟杆菌科(Bacteroides)(26% ~ 31%)、里氏杆菌科(Rikenellaceae)(9% ~ 16%)、副杆菌科(Parabacteroides)(2% ~ 5%)和Lachnoclostridium(2% ~ 6%)。iii) SFR组的操作分类学单位指数、Shannon指数、Simpson指数和观察物种指数均高于SEC组,GEC组高于GFR组,其中SFR组的盲肠微生物多样性在4组中最高。iv)聚类结果与菌株分类一致,两株蛋鸡盲肠细菌组成相似。结论:核心菌群不受饲养制度和菌种的影响。散养系统只增加了银羽鸡盲肠微生物的多样性。然而,在相同的饲粮条件下,两菌株处理的盲肠微生物组成相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences (AJAS) aims to publish original and cutting-edge research results and reviews on animal-related aspects of the life sciences. Emphasis will be placed on studies involving farm animals such as cattle, buffaloes, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, and poultry. Studies for the improvement of human health using animal models may also be publishable. AJAS will encompass all areas of animal production and fundamental aspects of animal sciences: breeding and genetics, reproduction and physiology, nutrition, meat and milk science, biotechnology, behavior, welfare, health, and livestock farming systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信