Rational budgeting approach as a nutrient management tool for mixed crop-swine farms in Korea.

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences Pub Date : 2020-09-01 Epub Date: 2019-12-24 DOI:10.5713/ajas.19.0640
Arif Reza, Soomin Shim, Seungsoo Kim, Sungil Ahn, Seunggun Won, Changsix Ra
{"title":"Rational budgeting approach as a nutrient management tool for mixed crop-swine farms in Korea.","authors":"Arif Reza,&nbsp;Soomin Shim,&nbsp;Seungsoo Kim,&nbsp;Sungil Ahn,&nbsp;Seunggun Won,&nbsp;Changsix Ra","doi":"10.5713/ajas.19.0640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Due to rapid economic return, mixed crop-swine farming systems in Korea have become more intensive. Intensive farming practices often cause nutrient surpluses and lead to environmental pollution. Nutrient budgets can be used to evaluate the environmental impact and as a regulatory policy instrument for nutrient management. This study was conducted to select a nutrient budgeting approach applicable to the mixed crop-swine farms in Korea and suggest an effective manure treatment method to reduce on-farm nutrient production.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we compared current and ideal gross nutrient balance (GNB) approaches of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and soil system budget (SSB) approach with reference to on-farm manure treatment processes. Data obtained from farm census and published literature were used to develop the farm nutrient budgets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) surpluses were approximately 11 times and over 7 times respectively higher in the GNB approaches than the SSB. After solid-liquid separation of manure, during liquid composting a change in aeration method from intermittent to continuous reduced the N and P loading about 50% and 47%, respectively. Although changing in solid composting method from turning only to turning+aeration improved the N removal efficiency by 30.5%, not much improvement in P removal efficiency was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the GNB approaches depict the impact of nutrients produced in the mixed crop-swine farms on the overall agricultural environment, the SSB approach shows the partitioning among different nutrient loss pathways and storage of nutrients within the soil system; thus, can help design sustainable nutrient management plans for the mixed cropswine farms. The study also suggests that continuous aeration for liquid composting and turning+aeration for solid composting can reduce nutrient loading to the soil.</p>","PeriodicalId":8558,"journal":{"name":"Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences","volume":"33 9","pages":"1520-1532"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7468169/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0640","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: Due to rapid economic return, mixed crop-swine farming systems in Korea have become more intensive. Intensive farming practices often cause nutrient surpluses and lead to environmental pollution. Nutrient budgets can be used to evaluate the environmental impact and as a regulatory policy instrument for nutrient management. This study was conducted to select a nutrient budgeting approach applicable to the mixed crop-swine farms in Korea and suggest an effective manure treatment method to reduce on-farm nutrient production.

Methods: In this study, we compared current and ideal gross nutrient balance (GNB) approaches of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and soil system budget (SSB) approach with reference to on-farm manure treatment processes. Data obtained from farm census and published literature were used to develop the farm nutrient budgets.

Results: The average nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) surpluses were approximately 11 times and over 7 times respectively higher in the GNB approaches than the SSB. After solid-liquid separation of manure, during liquid composting a change in aeration method from intermittent to continuous reduced the N and P loading about 50% and 47%, respectively. Although changing in solid composting method from turning only to turning+aeration improved the N removal efficiency by 30.5%, not much improvement in P removal efficiency was observed.

Conclusion: Although the GNB approaches depict the impact of nutrients produced in the mixed crop-swine farms on the overall agricultural environment, the SSB approach shows the partitioning among different nutrient loss pathways and storage of nutrients within the soil system; thus, can help design sustainable nutrient management plans for the mixed cropswine farms. The study also suggests that continuous aeration for liquid composting and turning+aeration for solid composting can reduce nutrient loading to the soil.

合理预算法作为韩国猪粮混合农场的营养管理工具。
目的:由于快速的经济回报,混合作物-猪养殖系统在韩国已经变得更加集约化。集约化耕作方式往往造成养分过剩,并导致环境污染。营养预算可用于评估环境影响,并作为营养管理的监管政策工具。本研究旨在选择一种适用于韩国混合作物猪场的养分预算方法,并提出一种有效的粪肥处理方法来减少农场养分产量。方法:在本研究中,我们比较了经济合作与发展组织(oecd)现行的总养分平衡(GNB)方法和土壤系统预算(SSB)方法,并参考了农场粪便处理过程。从农场普查和已发表的文献中获得的数据用于制定农场营养预算。结果:GNB途径的氮和磷平均盈余分别是SSB途径的11倍和7倍以上。粪肥固液分离后,在液体堆肥过程中,将曝气方式由间歇式改为连续式,氮、磷负荷分别降低约50%和47%。将固体堆肥方式由单纯翻施改为翻施+曝气,可使氮的去除效率提高30.5%,但对磷的去除效率没有明显提高。结论:虽然GNB方法描述了混合养猪场产生的养分对整体农业环境的影响,但SSB方法显示了不同养分损失途径之间的分配和土壤系统中养分的储存;因此,可以帮助设计可持续的混合作物猪场养分管理计划。研究还表明,液体堆肥连续曝气和固体堆肥翻转+曝气可以减少土壤养分负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences (AJAS) aims to publish original and cutting-edge research results and reviews on animal-related aspects of the life sciences. Emphasis will be placed on studies involving farm animals such as cattle, buffaloes, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, and poultry. Studies for the improvement of human health using animal models may also be publishable. AJAS will encompass all areas of animal production and fundamental aspects of animal sciences: breeding and genetics, reproduction and physiology, nutrition, meat and milk science, biotechnology, behavior, welfare, health, and livestock farming systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信