Pharmacological treatments for social anxiety disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Acta Neuropsychiatrica Pub Date : 2020-08-01 Epub Date: 2020-02-10 DOI:10.1017/neu.2020.6
Taryn Williams, Michael McCaul, Guido Schwarzer, Andrea Cipriani, Dan J Stein, Jonathan Ipser
{"title":"Pharmacological treatments for social anxiety disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Taryn Williams,&nbsp;Michael McCaul,&nbsp;Guido Schwarzer,&nbsp;Andrea Cipriani,&nbsp;Dan J Stein,&nbsp;Jonathan Ipser","doi":"10.1017/neu.2020.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this paper was to provide a systematic review and update on the pharmacotherapy of social anxiety disorder (SAD), including the efficacy and tolerability of these agents, the ranking of interventions, and the grading of results by quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Common Mental Disorder Controlled Trial Register and two trial registries were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any pharmacological intervention or placebo in the treatment of SAD. We performed a standard pairwise meta-analysis using a random effects model and carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using the statistical package, R. Quality of evidence was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 67 RCTs in the review and 21 to 45 interventions in the NMA. Paroxetine was most effective in the reduction of symptom severity as compared to placebo. Superior response to treatment was also observed for paroxetine, brofaromine, bromazepam, clonazepam, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, phenelzine, and sertraline. Higher dropout rates were found for fluvoxamine. Brofaromine, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, pregabalin, sertraline, and venlafaxine performed worse in comparison to placebo for the outcome of dropouts due to adverse events. Olanzapine yielded a relatively high rank for treatment efficacy and buspirone the worse rank for dropouts due to any cause.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The differences between drugs and placebo were small, apart from a significant reduction in symptom severity and response for paroxetine. We suggest paroxetine as a first-line treatment of SAD, with the consideration of future research on the drug olanzapine as well as brofaromine, bromazepam, clonazepam, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, phenelzine, and sertraline because we observed a response to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48964,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/neu.2020.6","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2020.6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this paper was to provide a systematic review and update on the pharmacotherapy of social anxiety disorder (SAD), including the efficacy and tolerability of these agents, the ranking of interventions, and the grading of results by quality of evidence.

Methods: The Common Mental Disorder Controlled Trial Register and two trial registries were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any pharmacological intervention or placebo in the treatment of SAD. We performed a standard pairwise meta-analysis using a random effects model and carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using the statistical package, R. Quality of evidence was also assessed.

Results: We included 67 RCTs in the review and 21 to 45 interventions in the NMA. Paroxetine was most effective in the reduction of symptom severity as compared to placebo. Superior response to treatment was also observed for paroxetine, brofaromine, bromazepam, clonazepam, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, phenelzine, and sertraline. Higher dropout rates were found for fluvoxamine. Brofaromine, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, pregabalin, sertraline, and venlafaxine performed worse in comparison to placebo for the outcome of dropouts due to adverse events. Olanzapine yielded a relatively high rank for treatment efficacy and buspirone the worse rank for dropouts due to any cause.

Conclusion: The differences between drugs and placebo were small, apart from a significant reduction in symptom severity and response for paroxetine. We suggest paroxetine as a first-line treatment of SAD, with the consideration of future research on the drug olanzapine as well as brofaromine, bromazepam, clonazepam, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, phenelzine, and sertraline because we observed a response to treatment.

成人社交焦虑障碍的药物治疗:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
目的:本文旨在对社交焦虑障碍(SAD)的药物治疗进行系统回顾和更新,包括这些药物的疗效和耐受性,干预措施的排名以及证据质量对结果的评分。方法:检索常见精神障碍对照试验注册库和两个试验注册库,以比较任何药物干预或安慰剂治疗SAD的随机对照试验(rct)。我们使用随机效应模型进行了标准的两两元分析,并使用统计软件包r进行了网络元分析(NMA)。结果:我们纳入了67项随机对照试验和21 - 45项NMA干预措施。与安慰剂相比,帕罗西汀在减轻症状严重程度方面最有效。帕罗西汀、溴法明、溴西泮、氯硝西泮、艾司西酞普兰、氟伏沙明、苯肼和舍曲林对治疗的反应也很好。氟伏沙明的辍学率较高。与安慰剂相比,溴法明、艾司西酞普兰、氟伏沙明、帕罗西汀、普瑞巴林、舍曲林和文拉法辛在因不良事件而退出的结果中表现更差。奥氮平在治疗效果上排名相对较高,丁螺环酮在任何原因导致的退出中排名较差。结论:除了帕罗西汀的症状严重程度和疗效显著降低外,药物与安慰剂之间的差异很小。我们建议将帕罗西汀作为SAD的一线治疗药物,同时考虑到未来对药物奥氮平以及溴法明、溴西泮、氯硝西泮、艾司西酞普兰、氟伏沙明、苯肼和舍曲林的研究,因为我们观察到对治疗的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
Acta Neuropsychiatrica NEUROSCIENCES-PSYCHIATRY
自引率
5.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Acta Neuropsychiatrica is an international journal focussing on translational neuropsychiatry. It publishes high-quality original research papers and reviews. The Journal''s scope specifically highlights the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health that can be viewed broadly as the spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信