Evaluation of the completeness of interventions reported in published randomized controlled trials in plastic surgery: A cross-sectional review protocol

IF 1.1 Q3 SURGERY

International Journal of Surgery Protocols Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.isjp.2019.12.001

Sheridan Evans , Shelby Rauh , Samuel Jellison , Brian Diener , Riaz Agha , Matt Vassar

{"title":"Evaluation of the completeness of interventions reported in published randomized controlled trials in plastic surgery: A cross-sectional review protocol","authors":"Sheridan Evans , Shelby Rauh , Samuel Jellison , Brian Diener , Riaz Agha , Matt Vassar","doi":"10.1016/j.isjp.2019.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are critical in developing new therapeutic approaches. Historically, in plastic surgery, RCTs are uncommon as they make up less than 2% of all publications. However there has recently been an increase in RCTs appearing in plastic surgery but the quality of these articles has yet to be assessed. We aim to determine the completeness of intervention reporting in plastic surgery RCTs using the TIDieR checklist.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A search of Pubmed for RCTs published in the top 10 plastic surgery journals as determined by the Google h5-index will be performed by two investigators. All identified articles will be isolated and a random selection of 300 articles will be screened for inclusion in the study by two different investigators. All types of RCTs will be included in this study. Articles will be excluded if they are nonrandomized, observational, follow-up studies, or secondary analyses. Full exclusion criteria can be found within this protocol. Extracted data includes all 12 points of the TIDieR checklist, journal, intervention type, sample size, and funding source. A complete list of what data will be extracted is listed within this protocol. All data extraction will be performed by two independent investigators. All work will be verified by the two investigators and any discrepancies will be resolved via consensus between investigators or with third party adjudication.</p></div><div><h3>Dissemination</h3><p>We plan to publish this review in a peer-reviewed journal. We may also present this review at local and/or national conferences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":42077,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","volume":"19 ","pages":"Pages 8-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.isjp.2019.12.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468357420300012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are critical in developing new therapeutic approaches. Historically, in plastic surgery, RCTs are uncommon as they make up less than 2% of all publications. However there has recently been an increase in RCTs appearing in plastic surgery but the quality of these articles has yet to be assessed. We aim to determine the completeness of intervention reporting in plastic surgery RCTs using the TIDieR checklist.

Methods

A search of Pubmed for RCTs published in the top 10 plastic surgery journals as determined by the Google h5-index will be performed by two investigators. All identified articles will be isolated and a random selection of 300 articles will be screened for inclusion in the study by two different investigators. All types of RCTs will be included in this study. Articles will be excluded if they are nonrandomized, observational, follow-up studies, or secondary analyses. Full exclusion criteria can be found within this protocol. Extracted data includes all 12 points of the TIDieR checklist, journal, intervention type, sample size, and funding source. A complete list of what data will be extracted is listed within this protocol. All data extraction will be performed by two independent investigators. All work will be verified by the two investigators and any discrepancies will be resolved via consensus between investigators or with third party adjudication.

Dissemination

We plan to publish this review in a peer-reviewed journal. We may also present this review at local and/or national conferences.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在已发表的整形外科随机对照试验中报道的干预措施的完整性评价:一项横断面审查方案

背景:随机对照试验(RCTs)对于开发新的治疗方法至关重要。从历史上看，在整形外科中，随机对照试验并不常见，因为它们占所有出版物的不到2%。然而，最近在整形外科中出现的随机对照试验有所增加，但这些文章的质量尚未得到评估。我们的目的是使用TIDieR检查表确定整形外科随机对照试验中干预报告的完整性。方法由两名研究者在Pubmed检索由Google h5索引确定的前10位整形外科期刊发表的随机对照试验。所有确定的文章将被隔离，随机选择300篇文章将由两个不同的研究者筛选纳入研究。本研究将纳入所有类型的随机对照试验。非随机、观察性、随访研究或二次分析的文章将被排除。完整的排除标准可在本协议中找到。提取的数据包括TIDieR检查表的所有12点、期刊、干预类型、样本量和资金来源。该协议中列出了将提取哪些数据的完整列表。所有数据提取将由两名独立调查员进行。所有工作将由两名调查人员核实，任何差异将通过调查人员之间的共识或第三方裁决来解决。我们计划在同行评议的期刊上发表这篇综述。我们也可能在地方和/或国家会议上介绍这篇综述。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Surgery Protocols SURGERY-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： IJS Protocols is the first peer-reviewed, international, open access journal seeking to publish research protocols across across the full breadth of the surgical field. We are aim to provide rapid submission to decision times whilst maintaining a high quality peer-review process.