A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Mapleson Circuit with Nasal Trumpet to Standard Oxygen Supplementation during EBUS Bronchoscopy under Monitored Anesthesia Care.

Biomedicine Hub Pub Date : 2019-08-20 eCollection Date: 2019-05-01 DOI:10.1159/000502110
Wissam Abouzgheib, Talia K Ben-Jacob, Amit Borah, Rocco Terrigno, Karla Cruz-Morel, Robert Dy, Irwin Gratz, Ziad Boujaoude
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Mapleson Circuit with Nasal Trumpet to Standard Oxygen Supplementation during EBUS Bronchoscopy under Monitored Anesthesia Care.","authors":"Wissam Abouzgheib,&nbsp;Talia K Ben-Jacob,&nbsp;Amit Borah,&nbsp;Rocco Terrigno,&nbsp;Karla Cruz-Morel,&nbsp;Robert Dy,&nbsp;Irwin Gratz,&nbsp;Ziad Boujaoude","doi":"10.1159/000502110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) procedures tend to be longer than routine bronchoscopies. Increased duration and sedative dosing put patients at increased risk for -hypoxic events.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether oxygen supplementation via a nasal trumpet connected to a Mapleson B circuit (NTM) was effective in decreasing hypoxic events when compared with the standard of care, oxygen supplementation with a nasal cannula (NC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients referred for EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) were randomized 1:1 to NTM or to NC. Hypoxia-related procedural interruptions, the primary endpoint of the study, were documented for all patients. Patients in the NC group who had refractory desaturations were allowed to cross over to the NTM group. Secondary endpoints included: number of crossovers from NC to NTM, sedative dosing, total procedure times, whether procedure goals were achieved, complications apart from hypoxia, patient discharge status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two patients were randomized to NC and 48 to NTM. Baseline characteristics were comparable. The NC group had significantly more interruptions than did the NTM group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Procedure duration was also significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.03) shorter for the NTM group. Fourteen patients were crossed over from NC to NTM because of hypoxia. Thirteen out of the 14 completed the procedure with no interruptions. All procedures were successfully completed, and all goals were achieved. All patients returned to baseline status prior to discharge. Three minor complications of epistaxis occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients undergoing EBUS with MAC, oxygen supplementation with NTM significantly decreased the incidence of hypoxic events when compared with NC. NTM may also be of value for other subsets of patients who are at increased risk for desaturation when undergoing bronchoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9075,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine Hub","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000502110","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine Hub","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000502110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) procedures tend to be longer than routine bronchoscopies. Increased duration and sedative dosing put patients at increased risk for -hypoxic events.

Objective: To determine whether oxygen supplementation via a nasal trumpet connected to a Mapleson B circuit (NTM) was effective in decreasing hypoxic events when compared with the standard of care, oxygen supplementation with a nasal cannula (NC).

Methods: Patients referred for EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) were randomized 1:1 to NTM or to NC. Hypoxia-related procedural interruptions, the primary endpoint of the study, were documented for all patients. Patients in the NC group who had refractory desaturations were allowed to cross over to the NTM group. Secondary endpoints included: number of crossovers from NC to NTM, sedative dosing, total procedure times, whether procedure goals were achieved, complications apart from hypoxia, patient discharge status.

Results: Fifty-two patients were randomized to NC and 48 to NTM. Baseline characteristics were comparable. The NC group had significantly more interruptions than did the NTM group (p < 0.001). Procedure duration was also significantly (p < 0.03) shorter for the NTM group. Fourteen patients were crossed over from NC to NTM because of hypoxia. Thirteen out of the 14 completed the procedure with no interruptions. All procedures were successfully completed, and all goals were achieved. All patients returned to baseline status prior to discharge. Three minor complications of epistaxis occurred.

Conclusion: For patients undergoing EBUS with MAC, oxygen supplementation with NTM significantly decreased the incidence of hypoxic events when compared with NC. NTM may also be of value for other subsets of patients who are at increased risk for desaturation when undergoing bronchoscopy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项随机对照试验,比较监测麻醉护理下EBUS支气管镜检查时Mapleson循环与鼻喇叭与标准氧补充。
背景:支气管超声(EBUS)程序往往比常规支气管镜检查时间更长。持续时间的增加和镇静剂量增加了患者发生缺氧事件的风险。目的:确定通过连接Mapleson B回路(NTM)的鼻喇叭补氧与标准护理、鼻插管补氧(NC)相比,是否能有效减少缺氧事件。方法:采用ebus引导下经支气管穿刺麻醉监护(MAC)的患者按1:1随机分为NTM组和NC组。缺氧相关的程序性中断,研究的主要终点,记录了所有患者。NC组中出现难治性去饱和的患者被允许转入NTM组。次要终点包括:从NC到NTM的交叉次数、镇静剂量、总手术时间、手术目标是否实现、缺氧以外的并发症、患者出院情况。结果:52例患者随机分为NC组和48例NTM组。基线特征具有可比性。NC组的中断次数明显多于NTM组(p < 0.001)。NTM组的手术时间也显著缩短(p < 0.03)。14例患者因缺氧从NC过渡到NTM。14人中有13人在没有中断的情况下完成了手术。所有的程序都顺利完成,所有的目标都达到了。所有患者出院前均恢复到基线状态。发生了三种轻微的鼻出血并发症。结论:对于合并MAC的EBUS患者,与NC相比,NTM补氧显著降低了缺氧事件的发生率。NTM也可能对其他亚群患者有价值,这些患者在接受支气管镜检查时血饱和度降低的风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信