Comparison of the Immunogenicity and Safety of Two Pediatric TBE Vaccines Based on the Far Eastern and European Virus Subtypes.

IF 1.1 Q4 VIROLOGY
Advances in Virology Pub Date : 2019-12-24 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/5323428
Mikhail F Vorovitch, Galina B Maikova, Liubov L Chernokhaeva, Victor V Romanenko, Galina G Karganova, Aydar A Ishmukhametov
{"title":"Comparison of the Immunogenicity and Safety of Two Pediatric TBE Vaccines Based on the Far Eastern and European Virus Subtypes.","authors":"Mikhail F Vorovitch, Galina B Maikova, Liubov L Chernokhaeva, Victor V Romanenko, Galina G Karganova, Aydar A Ishmukhametov","doi":"10.1155/2019/5323428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Up to 10,000 cases of tick-borne encephalitis are registered annually, 20% of which occur in children under 17 years of age. A comparison of the immunogenicity and safety between a new pediatric Tick-E-Vac vaccine based on the TBEV strain Sofjin and FSME-IMMUN Junior vaccine was performed in the Sverdlovsk region. The vaccine strains differ from strains of the Siberian subtype of TBEV that dominates in the region. The study was performed on 163 children aged 1 to 15, who received one of the vaccines according to either a conventional or rapid vaccination schedule. Immunogenicity was assessed based on the seroprotection rates and titers of virus-neutralizing antibodies. There were no significant differences in either the immunogenicity or reactogenicity of the pediatric vaccines based on strains of the Far Eastern or European subtypes of TBEV. Under both vaccination schedules, 30 days after the second injection, seroprotection rates were 100% for Tick-E-Vac and greater than 95% for FSME-IMMUN Junior, while the geometric mean titer of TBEV-neutralizing antibodies was at least 2,4 log<sub>10</sub> (1 : 250) for either vaccine. Fourteen days after the second injection according to the rapid schedule, seroprotection rates were significantly lower, ranging from 50% to 63% regardless of the vaccine used. The observed adverse reactions were mild or moderate for both vaccines under both vaccination schedules, with total adverse event rates of less than 25%. Reactogenicity was not associated with the gender or age of the recipients. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions between the group of subjects who were baseline seronegative or seropositive. However, 14 days after the second vaccine injection according to the rapid schedule, a statistically significant difference in nAbs titers was identified between groups of children with and without reported reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7473,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Virology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Virology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5323428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Up to 10,000 cases of tick-borne encephalitis are registered annually, 20% of which occur in children under 17 years of age. A comparison of the immunogenicity and safety between a new pediatric Tick-E-Vac vaccine based on the TBEV strain Sofjin and FSME-IMMUN Junior vaccine was performed in the Sverdlovsk region. The vaccine strains differ from strains of the Siberian subtype of TBEV that dominates in the region. The study was performed on 163 children aged 1 to 15, who received one of the vaccines according to either a conventional or rapid vaccination schedule. Immunogenicity was assessed based on the seroprotection rates and titers of virus-neutralizing antibodies. There were no significant differences in either the immunogenicity or reactogenicity of the pediatric vaccines based on strains of the Far Eastern or European subtypes of TBEV. Under both vaccination schedules, 30 days after the second injection, seroprotection rates were 100% for Tick-E-Vac and greater than 95% for FSME-IMMUN Junior, while the geometric mean titer of TBEV-neutralizing antibodies was at least 2,4 log10 (1 : 250) for either vaccine. Fourteen days after the second injection according to the rapid schedule, seroprotection rates were significantly lower, ranging from 50% to 63% regardless of the vaccine used. The observed adverse reactions were mild or moderate for both vaccines under both vaccination schedules, with total adverse event rates of less than 25%. Reactogenicity was not associated with the gender or age of the recipients. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions between the group of subjects who were baseline seronegative or seropositive. However, 14 days after the second vaccine injection according to the rapid schedule, a statistically significant difference in nAbs titers was identified between groups of children with and without reported reactions.

基于远东和欧洲病毒亚型的两种小儿结核菌素疫苗的免疫原性和安全性比较。
每年登记在册的蜱传脑炎病例多达 10,000 例,其中 20% 发生在 17 岁以下的儿童身上。斯维尔德洛夫斯克地区对基于 TBEV 株 Sofjin 的新型儿科 Tick-E-Vac 疫苗和 FSME-IMMUN Junior 疫苗的免疫原性和安全性进行了比较。疫苗菌株与该地区主要的西伯利亚亚型 TBEV 菌株不同。研究对象为 163 名 1 至 15 岁的儿童,他们按照常规或快速接种计划接种了其中一种疫苗。根据血清保护率和病毒中和抗体滴度评估了免疫原性。基于远东或欧洲亚型 TBEV 毒株的儿科疫苗在免疫原性或反应原性方面均无明显差异。在两种疫苗接种方案下,第二次注射 30 天后,Tick-E-Vac 的血清保护率为 100%,FSME-IMMUN Junior 的血清保护率超过 95%,两种疫苗的 TBEV 中和抗体几何平均滴度至少为 2,4 log10 (1 : 250)。按照快速程序进行第二次注射 14 天后,血清保护率明显降低,无论使用哪种疫苗,保护率都在 50% 至 63% 之间。两种疫苗在两种接种方案下观察到的不良反应均为轻度或中度,不良反应总发生率低于 25%。反应发生率与接种者的性别或年龄无关。基线血清阴性或血清阳性受试者组之间的不良反应发生率没有明显的统计学差异。然而,在按照快速接种程序注射第二针疫苗 14 天后,发现出现和未出现不良反应的儿童组之间的 nAbs 滴度差异具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信