"There's More to Frail than That": Older New Zealanders and Health Professionals Talk about Frailty.

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Aging Research Pub Date : 2019-12-01 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/2573239
Susan B Gee, Gary Cheung, Ulrich Bergler, Hamish Jamieson
{"title":"\"There's More to Frail than That\": Older New Zealanders and Health Professionals Talk about Frailty.","authors":"Susan B Gee,&nbsp;Gary Cheung,&nbsp;Ulrich Bergler,&nbsp;Hamish Jamieson","doi":"10.1155/2019/2573239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is general agreement that frailty is common and important in later life, but there is less agreement about what frailty is. Little is known about the extent to which practicing health professionals and older people hold a mutual understanding of frailty. Focus groups were held to engage older people and health professionals in discussion about what made them think that someone was frail. Eighteen older people took part across three focus groups, and se'venteen health professionals took part across another three focus groups. Both the health professionals and the older people talked about the experience of frailty as an interplay of physical, psychological, and social dimensions. Older people with frailty were seen as needing help and being vulnerable to adverse outcomes, but accepting help was positioned by older people as an adaptive choice. The experience of frailty was described as being mediated by the individual's psychological mindset, highlighting the importance of approaches that recognise strengths and resilience. A broader and more balanced understanding of frailty may help create more rounded and appropriate approaches to assessment and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":14933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Research","volume":"2019 ","pages":"2573239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/2573239","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2573239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

There is general agreement that frailty is common and important in later life, but there is less agreement about what frailty is. Little is known about the extent to which practicing health professionals and older people hold a mutual understanding of frailty. Focus groups were held to engage older people and health professionals in discussion about what made them think that someone was frail. Eighteen older people took part across three focus groups, and se'venteen health professionals took part across another three focus groups. Both the health professionals and the older people talked about the experience of frailty as an interplay of physical, psychological, and social dimensions. Older people with frailty were seen as needing help and being vulnerable to adverse outcomes, but accepting help was positioned by older people as an adaptive choice. The experience of frailty was described as being mediated by the individual's psychological mindset, highlighting the importance of approaches that recognise strengths and resilience. A broader and more balanced understanding of frailty may help create more rounded and appropriate approaches to assessment and management.

Abstract Image

“脆弱不止于此”:年长的新西兰人和卫生专业人士谈论脆弱。
人们普遍认为,虚弱在以后的生活中很常见,也很重要,但对什么是虚弱却没有达成一致。对于执业卫生专业人员和老年人对虚弱的相互理解程度,人们知之甚少。举办了焦点小组,让老年人和卫生专业人员参与讨论是什么让他们认为某人很虚弱。18名老年人参加了三个重点小组的活动,另有三名卫生专业人员参加了另外三个重点组的活动。健康专业人员和老年人都将虚弱的经历视为身体、心理和社会层面的相互作用。虚弱的老年人被视为需要帮助,容易受到不利后果的影响,但接受帮助被老年人定位为一种适应性选择。虚弱的经历被描述为由个人的心理心态介导的,强调了识别力量和韧性的方法的重要性。对脆弱性有更广泛、更平衡的理解可能有助于制定更全面、更适当的评估和管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Aging Research
Journal of Aging Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信