Assessment of the Appropriateness of Ceftazidime Use in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital, Northern Ethiopia.

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety Pub Date : 2019-12-20 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DHPS.S226505
Teklu Gebrehiwot Gebremichael, Hiluf Hindeya Gebreyesus, Alem Gebremariam
{"title":"Assessment of the Appropriateness of Ceftazidime Use in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital, Northern Ethiopia.","authors":"Teklu Gebrehiwot Gebremichael,&nbsp;Hiluf Hindeya Gebreyesus,&nbsp;Alem Gebremariam","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S226505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ceftazidime is nowadays one of the most commonly used antibiotics due to its high antibacterial potency, wide spectrum of activity, and low potential for toxicity. However, the global trend shows huge misuse of ceftazidime.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to assess the appropriateness of ceftazidime use and to identify areas of intervention to prevent inappropriate use in different wards of Ayder Compressive Specialized Hospital, a tertiary teaching Hospital, Mekelle-Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A facility-based prospective cross-sectional study design was steered on 327 patients who received ceftazidime during their hospitalization in the selected wards from February 1 to April 30, 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the assessment of the appropriateness of ceftazidime use, 2,084 (70.8%) were appropriate. Appropriateness of indication was 295 (90.2%), the effectiveness of ceftazidime use was 221 (67.6%), correct dose of ceftazidime use was 264 (80.4%), and the correct frequency of ceftazidime use was 230 (70.3%). Its use was empiric in 275 participants (84.1%) and specific in 52 (15.9%) participants. The most common indication for ceftazidime use was uncomplicated pneumonia, at 112 (34.3%). One hundred and seventy-one (52.3%) participants had intervention to prevent inappropriate use of ceftazidime. Changing the drug combination (96, 29.4%), increasing the dose (13, 4%), decreasing the dose (21, 6.4%), holding the (21, 6.4%), and discontinuation of ceftazidime (20, 6.1%) were among the interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed that more than one-fourth of the ceftazidime use was inappropriate. This may lead to the emergence of resistant pathogens which in turn lead to treatment failure and increased the cost of therapy. Therefore, adherence to current evidence-based guidelines and initiating antimicrobial stewardship are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":"11 ","pages":"115-123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/DHPS.S226505","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S226505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Ceftazidime is nowadays one of the most commonly used antibiotics due to its high antibacterial potency, wide spectrum of activity, and low potential for toxicity. However, the global trend shows huge misuse of ceftazidime.

Objective: This study was conducted to assess the appropriateness of ceftazidime use and to identify areas of intervention to prevent inappropriate use in different wards of Ayder Compressive Specialized Hospital, a tertiary teaching Hospital, Mekelle-Ethiopia.

Methods: A facility-based prospective cross-sectional study design was steered on 327 patients who received ceftazidime during their hospitalization in the selected wards from February 1 to April 30, 2019.

Results: In the assessment of the appropriateness of ceftazidime use, 2,084 (70.8%) were appropriate. Appropriateness of indication was 295 (90.2%), the effectiveness of ceftazidime use was 221 (67.6%), correct dose of ceftazidime use was 264 (80.4%), and the correct frequency of ceftazidime use was 230 (70.3%). Its use was empiric in 275 participants (84.1%) and specific in 52 (15.9%) participants. The most common indication for ceftazidime use was uncomplicated pneumonia, at 112 (34.3%). One hundred and seventy-one (52.3%) participants had intervention to prevent inappropriate use of ceftazidime. Changing the drug combination (96, 29.4%), increasing the dose (13, 4%), decreasing the dose (21, 6.4%), holding the (21, 6.4%), and discontinuation of ceftazidime (20, 6.1%) were among the interventions.

Conclusion: This study revealed that more than one-fourth of the ceftazidime use was inappropriate. This may lead to the emergence of resistant pathogens which in turn lead to treatment failure and increased the cost of therapy. Therefore, adherence to current evidence-based guidelines and initiating antimicrobial stewardship are recommended.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

埃塞俄比亚北部某三级教学医院头孢他啶使用适宜性评估
背景:头孢他啶具有抗菌效力高、活性谱广、毒性低的特点,是目前最常用的抗生素之一。然而,全球趋势显示头孢他啶滥用现象严重。目的:本研究旨在评估头孢他啶使用的适宜性,并确定干预领域,以防止在埃塞俄比亚迈克勒三级教学医院艾德尔压缩专科医院的不同病房不适当使用头孢他啶。方法:采用基于医院的前瞻性横断面研究设计,对2019年2月1日至4月30日在选定病房住院期间服用头孢他啶的327例患者进行研究。结果:在头孢他啶使用适宜性评价中,适宜者2084例(70.8%)。适应证正确295例(90.2%),头孢他啶有效221例(67.6%),正确使用头孢他啶剂量264例(80.4%),正确使用头孢他啶频次230次(70.3%)。275名参与者(84.1%)的使用是经验性的,52名参与者(15.9%)是特异性的。头孢他啶最常见的适应症是无并发症肺炎,112例(34.3%)。171名(52.3%)参与者进行了干预,以防止不适当使用头孢他啶。改变药物组合(96例,29.4%)、增加剂量(13例,4%)、减少剂量(21例,6.4%)、持有(21例,6.4%)、停用头孢他啶(20例,6.1%)为干预措施。结论:本研究显示,超过四分之一的头孢他啶使用不当。这可能导致耐药病原体的出现,从而导致治疗失败并增加治疗费用。因此,建议遵守目前的循证指南并启动抗菌素管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信