2017 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.

IF 3.9 Q1 Health Professions

Diabetes Educator Pub Date : 2020-02-01 Epub Date: 2019-12-24 DOI:10.1177/0145721719897952

Joni Beck, Deborah A Greenwood, Lori Blanton, Sandra T Bollinger, Marcene K Butcher, Jo Ellen Condon, Marjorie Cypress, Priscilla Faulkner, Amy Hess Fischl, Theresa Francis, Leslie E Kolb, Jodi M Lavin-Tompkins, Janice MacLeod, Melinda Maryniuk, Carolé Mensing, Eric A Orzeck, David D Pope, Jodi L Pulizzi, Ardis A Reed, Andrew S Rhinehart, Linda Siminerio, Jing Wang

{"title":"2017 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.","authors":"Joni Beck, Deborah A Greenwood, Lori Blanton, Sandra T Bollinger, Marcene K Butcher, Jo Ellen Condon, Marjorie Cypress, Priscilla Faulkner, Amy Hess Fischl, Theresa Francis, Leslie E Kolb, Jodi M Lavin-Tompkins, Janice MacLeod, Melinda Maryniuk, Carolé Mensing, Eric A Orzeck, David D Pope, Jodi L Pulizzi, Ardis A Reed, Andrew S Rhinehart, Linda Siminerio, Jing Wang","doi":"10.1177/0145721719897952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study is to review the literature for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) to ensure the National Standards for DSMES (Standards) align with current evidence-based practices and utilization trends.Methods: The 10 Standards were divided among 20 interdisciplinary workgroup members. Members searched the current research for diabetes education and support, behavioral health, clinical, health care environment, technical, reimbursement, and business practice for the strongest evidence that guided the Standards revision.Results: Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support facilitates the knowledge, skills, and ability necessary for diabetes self-care as well as activities that assist a person in implementing and sustaining the behaviors needed to manage their condition on an ongoing basis. The evidence indicates that health care providers and people affected by diabetes are embracing technology, and this is having a positive impact of DSMES access, utilization, and outcomes.Conclusion: Quality DSMES continues to be a critical element of care for all people with diabetes. The DSMES services must be individualized and guided by the concerns, preferences, and needs of the person affected by diabetes. Even with the abundance of evidence supporting the benefits of DSMES, it continues to be underutilized, but as with other health care services, technology is changing the way DSMES is delivered and utilized with positive outcomes.","PeriodicalId":50584,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Educator","volume":"46 1","pages":"46-61"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0145721719897952","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721719897952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 24

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to review the literature for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) to ensure the National Standards for DSMES (Standards) align with current evidence-based practices and utilization trends.

Methods: The 10 Standards were divided among 20 interdisciplinary workgroup members. Members searched the current research for diabetes education and support, behavioral health, clinical, health care environment, technical, reimbursement, and business practice for the strongest evidence that guided the Standards revision.

Results: Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support facilitates the knowledge, skills, and ability necessary for diabetes self-care as well as activities that assist a person in implementing and sustaining the behaviors needed to manage their condition on an ongoing basis. The evidence indicates that health care providers and people affected by diabetes are embracing technology, and this is having a positive impact of DSMES access, utilization, and outcomes.

Conclusion: Quality DSMES continues to be a critical element of care for all people with diabetes. The DSMES services must be individualized and guided by the concerns, preferences, and needs of the person affected by diabetes. Even with the abundance of evidence supporting the benefits of DSMES, it continues to be underutilized, but as with other health care services, technology is changing the way DSMES is delivered and utilized with positive outcomes.

查看原文本刊更多论文

2017年《糖尿病自我管理教育与支持国家标准》。

目的:本研究的目的是回顾糖尿病自我管理教育和支持(DSMES)的文献，以确保DSMES的国家标准(标准)符合当前循证实践和使用趋势。方法:将10项标准在20个跨学科工作组成员中进行分配。成员们检索了当前关于糖尿病教育和支持、行为健康、临床、卫生保健环境、技术、报销和商业实践的研究，以寻找指导标准修订的最有力证据。结果:糖尿病自我管理教育和支持促进了糖尿病自我保健所需的知识、技能和能力，以及帮助人们实施和维持管理其病情所需的行为的活动。证据表明，卫生保健提供者和受糖尿病影响的人正在接受技术，这对DSMES的获取、利用和结果产生了积极影响。结论:高质量的DSMES仍然是所有糖尿病患者护理的关键因素。DSMES的服务必须个性化，并以糖尿病患者的关注、偏好和需求为指导。尽管有大量证据支持DSMES的益处，但它仍未得到充分利用，但与其他保健服务一样，技术正在改变DSMES的提供和利用方式，并取得积极成果。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Diabetes Educator 医学-内分泌学与代谢

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Diabetes Educator (TDE) is the official journal of the American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE). It is a peer-reviewed journal intended to serve as a reference source for the science and art of diabetes management. TDE publishes original articles that relate to aspects of patient care and education, clinical practice and/or research, and the multidisciplinary profession of diabetes education as represented by nurses, dietitians, physicians, pharmacists, mental health professionals, podiatrists, and exercise physiologists.