"Feasibility and utility of a simple computerized test for measuring saccade latency in progressive supranuclear palsy- a proof-of-concept study".

Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders Pub Date : 2019-12-06 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40734-019-0081-2
Marian L Dale, Emmi P Scott, Saher Khalid, Andrew S Eiseman, Travis H Turner
{"title":"\"Feasibility and utility of a simple computerized test for measuring saccade latency in progressive supranuclear palsy- a proof-of-concept study\".","authors":"Marian L Dale,&nbsp;Emmi P Scott,&nbsp;Saher Khalid,&nbsp;Andrew S Eiseman,&nbsp;Travis H Turner","doi":"10.1186/s40734-019-0081-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reliable detection of slowed vertical saccades may help discriminate progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) from the subset of Parkinson's disease patients who lack tremor (akinetic-rigid or PD-postural instability and gait disorder PIGD subtype), and from age-related oculomotor changes. We investigated the feasibility of a camera-less computerized behavioral saccade latency paradigm previously validated in PD to discriminate probable PSP-Richardson syndrome (PSP-RS) from PD-PIGD and age-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this proof-of-concept case-control study, reflexive saccade latencies were measured in 5 subjects with probable PSP-RS, 5 subjects with PD-PIGD subtype, and 5 age-matched controls using the behavioral paradigm. The battery was repeated approximately one month later. All subjects were examined off levodopa by a movement disorders neurologist and by an ophthalmologist, who also performed a dilated eye exam.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vertical prosaccade latencies were longer in the PSP group (median = 903 ms) relative to PD (median = 268 ms) and control groups (median = 235 ms), with no overlap between groups (100% accuracy). PSP subjects also had larger vertical-horizontal discrepancies than comparison groups. Test-retest reliability for the behavioral saccade measures was good (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.948; 95% confidence interval [0.856, 0.982]), and the measures strongly correlated with clinical ratings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Computerized behavioral measurement of reflexive saccade latency is feasible in PSP, and potentially discriminates probable PSP-RS from the PD-PIGD subtype. Findings from this proof-of-concept study support utility of the approach for obtaining objective saccade metrics in clinical evaluations and for tracking change in future, larger trials of moderately advanced PSP. Future studies should also examine the behavioral paradigm in earlier presentations of PSP and other subtypes of PSP.</p>","PeriodicalId":15374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders","volume":"6 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40734-019-0081-2","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40734-019-0081-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reliable detection of slowed vertical saccades may help discriminate progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) from the subset of Parkinson's disease patients who lack tremor (akinetic-rigid or PD-postural instability and gait disorder PIGD subtype), and from age-related oculomotor changes. We investigated the feasibility of a camera-less computerized behavioral saccade latency paradigm previously validated in PD to discriminate probable PSP-Richardson syndrome (PSP-RS) from PD-PIGD and age-matched controls.

Methods: In this proof-of-concept case-control study, reflexive saccade latencies were measured in 5 subjects with probable PSP-RS, 5 subjects with PD-PIGD subtype, and 5 age-matched controls using the behavioral paradigm. The battery was repeated approximately one month later. All subjects were examined off levodopa by a movement disorders neurologist and by an ophthalmologist, who also performed a dilated eye exam.

Results: Vertical prosaccade latencies were longer in the PSP group (median = 903 ms) relative to PD (median = 268 ms) and control groups (median = 235 ms), with no overlap between groups (100% accuracy). PSP subjects also had larger vertical-horizontal discrepancies than comparison groups. Test-retest reliability for the behavioral saccade measures was good (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.948; 95% confidence interval [0.856, 0.982]), and the measures strongly correlated with clinical ratings.

Conclusions: Computerized behavioral measurement of reflexive saccade latency is feasible in PSP, and potentially discriminates probable PSP-RS from the PD-PIGD subtype. Findings from this proof-of-concept study support utility of the approach for obtaining objective saccade metrics in clinical evaluations and for tracking change in future, larger trials of moderately advanced PSP. Future studies should also examine the behavioral paradigm in earlier presentations of PSP and other subtypes of PSP.

“一种简单的计算机测试用于测量进行性核上性麻痹的扫视潜伏期的可行性和实用性——一项概念验证研究”。
背景:可靠的慢速垂直扫视检测可能有助于区分进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)与缺乏震颤的帕金森病患者亚群(运动刚性或pd -姿势不稳定和步态障碍PIGD亚型),以及与年龄相关的眼动变化。我们研究了先前在PD中验证的无相机计算机化行为扫视潜伏期范式的可行性,以区分PD- pigd和年龄匹配对照中可能的psp -理查德森综合征(PSP-RS)。方法:在这项概念验证的病例对照研究中,使用行为范式测量了5名可能患有PSP-RS的受试者、5名PD-PIGD亚型的受试者和5名年龄匹配的对照组的反身性扫视潜伏期。大约一个月后又进行了一次试验。一名运动障碍神经科医生和一名眼科医生对所有受试者进行了左旋多巴检查,并对他们进行了散瞳视力检查。结果:相对于PD组(中位数为268 ms)和对照组(中位数为235 ms), PSP组(中位数为903 ms)的垂向前驱电位潜伏期较长,两组间无重叠(准确率100%)。与对照组相比,PSP受试者的纵向水平差异也更大。行为扫视量表的重测信度较好(类间相关系数= 0.948;95%可信区间[0.856,0.982]),且测量结果与临床评分高度相关。结论:计算机行为测量反射性扫视潜伏期在PSP中是可行的,并且可能区分可能的PSP- rs和PD-PIGD亚型。这项概念验证研究的结果支持了该方法在临床评估中获得客观的眼跳指标的效用,以及在未来中重度PSP的更大规模试验中跟踪变化的效用。未来的研究还应该检查早期PSP和其他亚型PSP的行为范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信