Modulus of Elasticity of Two Ceramic Materials and Stress-Inducing Mechanical Deformation following Fabrication Techniques and Adhesive Cementation Procedures of a Dental Ceramic.

IF 3 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
International Journal of Biomaterials Pub Date : 2019-11-19 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/4325845
G Isgrò, D Rodi, A Sachs, M Hashimoto
{"title":"Modulus of Elasticity of Two Ceramic Materials and Stress-Inducing Mechanical Deformation following Fabrication Techniques and Adhesive Cementation Procedures of a Dental Ceramic.","authors":"G Isgrò, D Rodi, A Sachs, M Hashimoto","doi":"10.1155/2019/4325845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Fabrication technique, precementation, and cementation operative procedures can induce significant modification of the stressing patterns throughout the thickness of some classes of dental ceramic materials.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate, by means of the deflection test, residual stress in restorative dental ceramic following fabrication technique, precementation, and resin cement coating procedures and to relate it to the elastic property of the ceramic material tested.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From IPS e.max® Press, lithium disilicate heat-pressed glass-ceramic (elastic modulus of 95 ± 5 GPa) disc-shaped specimens (<i>n</i> = 10) were made according to the manufacturer's instructions. One surface of the specimens was polished to provide accurate baseline profilometric measurements (reference surface). Deflection measurements were performed after polishing and annealing alumina air-particle abrasion of the unpolished surface followed by resin cement coating of the alumina air-particle abraded surface. The specimens were reprofiled at 24, 48, and 168 hrs after coating. The Friedman test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test was employed to identify significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05). To compare the difference in mean of maximum mechanical deflection, after cement coating at 0 hr, between two different ceramic materials (IPS e.max Press and Vitadur Alpha (result from another study)), Student's <i>t</i>-test for unpaired data was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline profilometric measurements identified a convex form on the polished surface of the ceramic discs with a mean of maximum mechanical deflection of 4.45 ± 0.87 <i>μ</i>m. A significant reduction in convexity of the polished specimens was characterized after alumina air-particle abrasion of the unpolished surface. The mean deflection significantly increased after resin cement coating and did not change over the time investigated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The precementation treatment, namely, alumina air-particle abrasion and cementation procedure of IPS e.max® Press glass-ceramic disc-shaped specimens generates stress that induced mechanical deformation. However, a dental ceramic material with higher elastic modulus (stiffer) would minimize stress-inducing mechanical deformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomaterials","volume":"2019 ","pages":"4325845"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4325845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: Fabrication technique, precementation, and cementation operative procedures can induce significant modification of the stressing patterns throughout the thickness of some classes of dental ceramic materials.

Objectives: To estimate, by means of the deflection test, residual stress in restorative dental ceramic following fabrication technique, precementation, and resin cement coating procedures and to relate it to the elastic property of the ceramic material tested.

Materials and methods: From IPS e.max® Press, lithium disilicate heat-pressed glass-ceramic (elastic modulus of 95 ± 5 GPa) disc-shaped specimens (n = 10) were made according to the manufacturer's instructions. One surface of the specimens was polished to provide accurate baseline profilometric measurements (reference surface). Deflection measurements were performed after polishing and annealing alumina air-particle abrasion of the unpolished surface followed by resin cement coating of the alumina air-particle abraded surface. The specimens were reprofiled at 24, 48, and 168 hrs after coating. The Friedman test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test was employed to identify significant differences (p < 0.05). To compare the difference in mean of maximum mechanical deflection, after cement coating at 0 hr, between two different ceramic materials (IPS e.max Press and Vitadur Alpha (result from another study)), Student's t-test for unpaired data was performed.

Results: Baseline profilometric measurements identified a convex form on the polished surface of the ceramic discs with a mean of maximum mechanical deflection of 4.45 ± 0.87 μm. A significant reduction in convexity of the polished specimens was characterized after alumina air-particle abrasion of the unpolished surface. The mean deflection significantly increased after resin cement coating and did not change over the time investigated.

Conclusions: The precementation treatment, namely, alumina air-particle abrasion and cementation procedure of IPS e.max® Press glass-ceramic disc-shaped specimens generates stress that induced mechanical deformation. However, a dental ceramic material with higher elastic modulus (stiffer) would minimize stress-inducing mechanical deformation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

两种陶瓷材料的弹性模量以及牙科陶瓷的制造技术和粘接固结程序导致的应力诱发机械变形。
问题陈述:制作技术、预固化和粘接操作程序会导致某些类别的牙科陶瓷材料在整个厚度上的应力模式发生显著变化:目的:通过挠度测试估算牙科陶瓷修复体在经过制作技术、预处理和树脂粘结剂涂层程序后的残余应力,并将其与受测陶瓷材料的弹性属性联系起来:根据制造商的说明,用 IPS e.max® Press 制作二硅酸锂热压玻璃陶瓷(弹性模量为 95 ± 5 GPa)圆盘状试样(n = 10)。对试样的一个表面进行抛光,以提供精确的基线轮廓测量(参考表面)。在对未抛光表面进行抛光和退火氧化铝气粒研磨后,再对氧化铝气粒研磨表面进行树脂胶结涂层,然后进行挠度测量。在涂覆后的 24、48 和 168 小时对试样进行重新测定。采用弗里德曼检验和邓恩多重比较检验来确定显著差异(P < 0.05)。为了比较两种不同陶瓷材料(IPS e.max Press 和 Vitadur Alpha(另一项研究结果))在 0 小时涂水泥后最大机械挠度平均值的差异,对非配对数据进行了学生 t 检验:基线轮廓测量结果表明,陶瓷盘抛光表面呈凸形,最大机械偏差平均值为 4.45 ± 0.87 μm。氧化铝气粒磨蚀未抛光表面后,抛光试样的凸度明显减小。涂抹树脂水泥后,平均挠度明显增加,但在调查时间内没有变化:对 IPS e.max® Press 玻璃陶瓷圆盘形试样进行预固化处理,即氧化铝空气颗粒磨蚀和粘结程序,会产生应力,从而引起机械变形。然而,弹性模量较高(较硬)的牙科陶瓷材料可最大限度地减少应力引起的机械变形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Biomaterials
International Journal of Biomaterials MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
50
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信