Elizabeth Pleasants, Tekou B Koffi, Karen Weidert, Sandra I McCoy, Ndola Prata
{"title":"Are Women In Lomé Getting Their Desired Methods Of Contraception? Understanding Provider Bias From Restrictions To Choice.","authors":"Elizabeth Pleasants, Tekou B Koffi, Karen Weidert, Sandra I McCoy, Ndola Prata","doi":"10.2147/OAJC.S226481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite improvements in contraception availability, women face persistent barriers that compromise reproductive autonomy and informed choice. Provider bias is one way in which access to contraception can be restricted within clinical encounters and has been established as common in sub-Saharan Africa. This analysis assessed the prevalence of provider restrictions and the potential impact on women's method uptake in Lomé, Togo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This sub-analysis used survey data from provider and client interviews collected to assess the impacts of the Agir pour la Planification Familiale (AgirPF) program in Togo. The relationships between provider restrictiveness and women's receipt of their desired method of contraception were modelled using mixed effects logistic regressions looking at all women and among subgroups hypothesized to be at potentially higher risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Around 84% of providers reported a restriction in contraceptive provision for the five contraceptive methods explored (pill, male condom, injectable, IUD, and implant). Around 53% of providers reported restricting at least four of the five methods based on age, parity, partner consent, or marital status. Among all women, there were no significant associations between provider restrictiveness and women's receipt of desired method, including among those who desired long-acting methods. In adjusted modeling, marital status was a covariate significantly associated with desired method, with married women more likely to receive their desired method than unmarried women (aOR 2.73, 95% CI 1.45-5.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Provider reports of high levels of restrictions in this population are concerning and should be further explored, especially its effects on unmarried women. However, restrictions reported by providers in this study did not appear to statistically significantly influence contraceptive method received.</p>","PeriodicalId":74348,"journal":{"name":"Open access journal of contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAJC.S226481","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open access journal of contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S226481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Background: Despite improvements in contraception availability, women face persistent barriers that compromise reproductive autonomy and informed choice. Provider bias is one way in which access to contraception can be restricted within clinical encounters and has been established as common in sub-Saharan Africa. This analysis assessed the prevalence of provider restrictions and the potential impact on women's method uptake in Lomé, Togo.
Methods: This sub-analysis used survey data from provider and client interviews collected to assess the impacts of the Agir pour la Planification Familiale (AgirPF) program in Togo. The relationships between provider restrictiveness and women's receipt of their desired method of contraception were modelled using mixed effects logistic regressions looking at all women and among subgroups hypothesized to be at potentially higher risk of bias.
Results: Around 84% of providers reported a restriction in contraceptive provision for the five contraceptive methods explored (pill, male condom, injectable, IUD, and implant). Around 53% of providers reported restricting at least four of the five methods based on age, parity, partner consent, or marital status. Among all women, there were no significant associations between provider restrictiveness and women's receipt of desired method, including among those who desired long-acting methods. In adjusted modeling, marital status was a covariate significantly associated with desired method, with married women more likely to receive their desired method than unmarried women (aOR 2.73, 95% CI 1.45-5.13).
Conclusion: Provider reports of high levels of restrictions in this population are concerning and should be further explored, especially its effects on unmarried women. However, restrictions reported by providers in this study did not appear to statistically significantly influence contraceptive method received.
背景:尽管避孕措施的可获得性有所改善,但妇女仍面临着损害生殖自主权和知情选择的持续障碍。提供者偏见是在临床接触中限制获得避孕措施的一种方式,在撒哈拉以南非洲已被证实是常见的。该分析评估了多哥lomoise地区提供者限制的普遍程度以及对妇女采用避孕方法的潜在影响。方法:这一子分析使用了从提供者和客户访谈收集的调查数据,以评估AgirPF计划在多哥的影响。使用混合效应逻辑回归对所有妇女和假设存在潜在较高偏倚风险的亚组进行建模,研究提供者限制与妇女接受其期望的避孕方法之间的关系。结果:约84%的医疗服务提供者报告称,对所探索的五种避孕方法(避孕药、男用避孕套、注射剂、宫内节育器和植入物)的避孕措施提供限制。大约53%的提供者报告说,根据年龄、胎次、伴侣同意或婚姻状况,限制了五种方法中的至少四种。在所有妇女中,提供者的限制与妇女接受所需方法之间没有显著关联,包括那些希望使用长效方法的妇女。在调整后的模型中,婚姻状况是与期望方法显著相关的协变量,已婚女性比未婚女性更有可能接受他们期望的方法(aOR 2.73, 95% CI 1.45-5.13)。结论:提供者报告的这一人群的高水平限制令人担忧,应进一步探讨,特别是其对未婚妇女的影响。然而,在这项研究中,提供者报告的限制似乎对所采用的避孕方法没有统计学上的显著影响。