Biweekly fotemustine schedule for recurrent glioblastoma in the elderly: activity and toxicity assessment of a multicenter study.

Q1 Medicine
CNS Oncology Pub Date : 2019-06-01 Epub Date: 2019-07-10 DOI:10.2217/cns-2019-0004
Raffaele Addeo, Giuseppe Lamberti, Giorgia Simonetti, Patrizia Iodice, Alfredo Marinelli, Liliana Montella, Salvatore Cappabianca, Paola Gaviani, Michele Caraglia, Salvatore Del Prete, Antonio Silvani
{"title":"Biweekly fotemustine schedule for recurrent glioblastoma in the elderly: activity and toxicity assessment of a multicenter study.","authors":"Raffaele Addeo,&nbsp;Giuseppe Lamberti,&nbsp;Giorgia Simonetti,&nbsp;Patrizia Iodice,&nbsp;Alfredo Marinelli,&nbsp;Liliana Montella,&nbsp;Salvatore Cappabianca,&nbsp;Paola Gaviani,&nbsp;Michele Caraglia,&nbsp;Salvatore Del Prete,&nbsp;Antonio Silvani","doi":"10.2217/cns-2019-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To assess the efficacy and safety of alternative fotemustine administration schedule in elderly patients with recurrent glioblastoma. <b>Patients & methods:</b> Patients aged >65 years with recurrent glioblastoma received fotemustine (80 mg/m<sup>2</sup>; days 1, 15, 30, 45 and 60, and subsequently every 4 weeks). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. Main secondary end point was safety. <b>Results:</b> 58 patients were enrolled at two centers. PFS at 6 months was 47% (27 patients) and overall response rate was 29%. Median PFS and survival were 6 and 7 months, respectively, and longer in responders versus nonresponders. No grade 3-4 hematological toxicities occurred. <b>Conclusion:</b> The alternative fotemustine administration schedule was an effective and safe treatment for recurrent glioblastoma in elderly patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10469,"journal":{"name":"CNS Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/cns-2019-0004","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/cns-2019-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of alternative fotemustine administration schedule in elderly patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients & methods: Patients aged >65 years with recurrent glioblastoma received fotemustine (80 mg/m2; days 1, 15, 30, 45 and 60, and subsequently every 4 weeks). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. Main secondary end point was safety. Results: 58 patients were enrolled at two centers. PFS at 6 months was 47% (27 patients) and overall response rate was 29%. Median PFS and survival were 6 and 7 months, respectively, and longer in responders versus nonresponders. No grade 3-4 hematological toxicities occurred. Conclusion: The alternative fotemustine administration schedule was an effective and safe treatment for recurrent glioblastoma in elderly patients.

Abstract Image

福莫司汀治疗老年复发性胶质母细胞瘤的双周计划:一项多中心研究的活性和毒性评估。
目的:评估替莫司汀替代给药方案对老年复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者的疗效和安全性。患者和方法:年龄>65岁的复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者接受佛莫司汀(80mg/m2;第1、15、30、45和60天,随后每4周一次)。主要终点是6个月时的无进展生存率(PFS)。主要的次要终点是安全。结果:58名患者被纳入两个中心。6个月时PFS为47%(27名患者),总有效率为29%。有应答者的中位PFS和生存期分别为6个月和7个月,应答者和无应答者的生存期更长。未发生3-4级血液学毒性。结论:替莫司汀替代给药方案是治疗老年复发性胶质母细胞瘤有效、安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CNS Oncology
CNS Oncology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信