Qualitative Case Study of Public Health Preparedness and Response to the Rabid Raccoon Discovered in Wise County, Virginia.

Journal of veterinary medicine Pub Date : 2019-04-01 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/5734590
Brian Martin, Benjamin Williamson, Vinayak K Nahar, Karen Gruszynski, Manoj Sharma, Jason W Johnson
{"title":"Qualitative Case Study of Public Health Preparedness and Response to the Rabid Raccoon Discovered in Wise County, Virginia.","authors":"Brian Martin,&nbsp;Benjamin Williamson,&nbsp;Vinayak K Nahar,&nbsp;Karen Gruszynski,&nbsp;Manoj Sharma,&nbsp;Jason W Johnson","doi":"10.1155/2019/5734590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rabies is a zoonotic lyssavirus of mammals that is a major public health threat due to the high mortality rate in humans who develop clinical symptoms. In the United States and other developed countries, the main reservoirs are wildlife species. In April 2017, a raccoon tested positive for rabies in Wise County, Virginia, with a second raccoon testing positive in May. Wise County, Virginia, is one of the few counties in western Virginia that is not endemic for raccoon rabies variant virus. Due to this fact, local, state, and federal agencies worked together to prevent and control the outbreak to stop the public health theat. The purpose of this study was to understand how professionals from these various agencies viewed the response efforts to the two rabid raccoons in 2017 and to determine what could be done to improve future responses. A list of responders from the different agencies involved in the outbreak in 2017 was created. Participants were recruited via email and those who agreed to be interviewed were contacted via telephone. Participants were asked a series of 13 questions pertaining to the 2017 outbreak to understand more about the strengths and weaknesses perceived during the outbreak. Of the 11 individuals contacted, six agreed to an interview. Data were analyzed utilizing a three-step qualitative analysis process which included the steps of open coding, audit trail, and axial coding. Staff and partnerships were identified as strengths of the response while funding, community, and region were identified as weaknesses of the response. It is hoped that by identifying different strengths and weaknesses through qualitative analysis this will aid in improving future responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":91135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medicine","volume":"2019 ","pages":"5734590"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/5734590","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5734590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rabies is a zoonotic lyssavirus of mammals that is a major public health threat due to the high mortality rate in humans who develop clinical symptoms. In the United States and other developed countries, the main reservoirs are wildlife species. In April 2017, a raccoon tested positive for rabies in Wise County, Virginia, with a second raccoon testing positive in May. Wise County, Virginia, is one of the few counties in western Virginia that is not endemic for raccoon rabies variant virus. Due to this fact, local, state, and federal agencies worked together to prevent and control the outbreak to stop the public health theat. The purpose of this study was to understand how professionals from these various agencies viewed the response efforts to the two rabid raccoons in 2017 and to determine what could be done to improve future responses. A list of responders from the different agencies involved in the outbreak in 2017 was created. Participants were recruited via email and those who agreed to be interviewed were contacted via telephone. Participants were asked a series of 13 questions pertaining to the 2017 outbreak to understand more about the strengths and weaknesses perceived during the outbreak. Of the 11 individuals contacted, six agreed to an interview. Data were analyzed utilizing a three-step qualitative analysis process which included the steps of open coding, audit trail, and axial coding. Staff and partnerships were identified as strengths of the response while funding, community, and region were identified as weaknesses of the response. It is hoped that by identifying different strengths and weaknesses through qualitative analysis this will aid in improving future responses.

弗吉尼亚州怀斯县发现的狂犬病浣熊的公共卫生准备和反应的定性案例研究。
狂犬病是哺乳动物的一种人畜共患溶血病毒,由于出现临床症状的人类死亡率很高,是对公共健康的主要威胁。在美国和其他发达国家,主要的水库是野生动物物种。2017年4月,弗吉尼亚州怀斯县一只浣熊的狂犬病检测呈阳性,5月又有一只浣熊检测呈阳性。弗吉尼亚州怀斯县是弗吉尼亚州西部少数几个没有浣熊狂犬病变异病毒流行的县之一。由于这一事实,地方、州和联邦机构共同努力预防和控制疫情,以阻止公共卫生。这项研究的目的是了解来自这些不同机构的专业人员如何看待2017年对两只患有狂犬病的浣熊的应对工作,并确定如何改进未来的应对措施。创建了一份来自2017年疫情爆发的不同机构的响应者名单。参与者通过电子邮件招募,同意接受面试的人通过电话联系。参与者被问了一系列与2017年疫情有关的13个问题,以更多地了解疫情期间的优势和劣势。在联系的11个人中,有6个人同意接受采访。数据分析采用三步定性分析过程,包括开放编码、审计跟踪和轴向编码。工作人员和伙伴关系被确定为应对措施的优势,而资金、社区和区域被确定为回应措施的弱点。希望通过定性分析确定不同的优势和劣势,这将有助于改进未来的应对措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信