A multicenter, open-label, noninterventional study to evaluate the impact on clinical effects, user-friendliness and patients' acceptance of AirFluSal Forspiro in the treatment of asthma under real-life conditions (ASSURE).

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Pragmatic and Observational Research Pub Date : 2019-05-24 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2147/POR.S200654
Vibeke Backer, Leif Bjermer, Olav Kåre Refvem, Andreas Søderman, Spencer Jones
{"title":"A multicenter, open-label, noninterventional study to evaluate the impact on clinical effects, user-friendliness and patients' acceptance of AirFluSal Forspiro in the treatment of asthma under real-life conditions (ASSURE).","authors":"Vibeke Backer,&nbsp;Leif Bjermer,&nbsp;Olav Kåre Refvem,&nbsp;Andreas Søderman,&nbsp;Spencer Jones","doi":"10.2147/POR.S200654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The design of inhaler devices may potentially influence adherence/persistence and outcomes in asthma. <b>Objective:</b> The primary objective was to assess asthma control and any change in the quality of life in patients using an intuitive dry powder inhaler containing fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (AirFluSal<sup>®</sup> Forspiro<sup>®</sup>) for the treatment of asthma in everyday practice. <b>Methods:</b> ASSURE was a multicenter, noninterventional, open-label, prospective study in patients with asthma, aged ≥12 years and treated with the Forspiro device in Denmark, Sweden and Norway. Patients' opinions of their asthma control were assessed by the Asthma Control Test (ACT) questionnaire and asthma-related quality of life by the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (miniAQLQ) at baseline and at two follow-up visits (approximately 4-8-week intervals). <b>Results:</b> Of 321 patients enrolled in the study, 299 received at least one dose of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol via the Forspiro device and 204 had evaluable data at the baseline visit and at least one later visit. Patients showed improvements in asthma control and quality of life during the study. The mean sum score of ACT increased from 18.0 (SD 4.5) at visit 1 to 19.9 (4.2) at visit 2 and 20.5 (4.3) at visit 3. Overall, 38.2% of patients improved by the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of ≥3 points (45.6% among those with a baseline score below 23 [ie, not already well controlled]). The mean score on the miniAQLQ increased from 5.16 (SD 1.24) at visit 1 to 5.58 (SD 1.20) at visit 2 and 5.82 (SD 1.04) at visit 3. Overall, 42.6% of patients improved by the MCID of ≥0.5. <b>Conclusion:</b> This real-life study suggests that treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol via the Forspiro device can improve asthma symptom control and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"29-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/POR.S200654","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S200654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The design of inhaler devices may potentially influence adherence/persistence and outcomes in asthma. Objective: The primary objective was to assess asthma control and any change in the quality of life in patients using an intuitive dry powder inhaler containing fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (AirFluSal® Forspiro®) for the treatment of asthma in everyday practice. Methods: ASSURE was a multicenter, noninterventional, open-label, prospective study in patients with asthma, aged ≥12 years and treated with the Forspiro device in Denmark, Sweden and Norway. Patients' opinions of their asthma control were assessed by the Asthma Control Test (ACT) questionnaire and asthma-related quality of life by the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (miniAQLQ) at baseline and at two follow-up visits (approximately 4-8-week intervals). Results: Of 321 patients enrolled in the study, 299 received at least one dose of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol via the Forspiro device and 204 had evaluable data at the baseline visit and at least one later visit. Patients showed improvements in asthma control and quality of life during the study. The mean sum score of ACT increased from 18.0 (SD 4.5) at visit 1 to 19.9 (4.2) at visit 2 and 20.5 (4.3) at visit 3. Overall, 38.2% of patients improved by the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of ≥3 points (45.6% among those with a baseline score below 23 [ie, not already well controlled]). The mean score on the miniAQLQ increased from 5.16 (SD 1.24) at visit 1 to 5.58 (SD 1.20) at visit 2 and 5.82 (SD 1.04) at visit 3. Overall, 42.6% of patients improved by the MCID of ≥0.5. Conclusion: This real-life study suggests that treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol via the Forspiro device can improve asthma symptom control and quality of life.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项多中心、开放标签、非介入性研究,旨在评估在现实条件下使用airflusforspiro治疗哮喘的临床效果、用户友好性和患者接受度的影响(ASSURE)。
背景:吸入器装置的设计可能潜在地影响哮喘患者的依从性/持久性和预后。目的:主要目的是评估在日常实践中使用含有丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗(AirFluSal®Forspiro®)的直观干粉吸入器治疗哮喘患者的哮喘控制和生活质量的任何变化。方法:ASSURE是一项多中心、非介入、开放标签、前瞻性研究,在丹麦、瑞典和挪威接受Forspiro治疗的年龄≥12岁的哮喘患者中进行。在基线和两次随访(大约4-8周间隔)时,通过哮喘控制测试(ACT)问卷评估患者对哮喘控制的意见,并通过迷你哮喘生活质量问卷(miniAQLQ)评估患者与哮喘相关的生活质量。结果:在321例纳入研究的患者中,299例通过Forspiro装置接受了至少一剂丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗,204例在基线访问和至少一次后续访问时具有可评估的数据。在研究期间,患者在哮喘控制和生活质量方面表现出改善。ACT的平均总得分从第一次访问时的18.0 (SD 4.5)增加到第二次访问时的19.9(4.2)和第三次访问时的20.5(4.3)。总体而言,38.2%的患者在最小临床重要差异(MCID)≥3分的情况下得到改善(基线评分低于23分[即尚未得到良好控制]的患者中为45.6%)。miniAQLQ的平均得分从第一次访问时的5.16 (SD 1.24)增加到第二次访问时的5.58 (SD 1.20)和第三次访问时的5.82 (SD 1.04)。总体而言,42.6%的患者因MCID≥0.5而改善。结论:这项现实生活研究表明,通过Forspiro装置使用丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗治疗可改善哮喘症状控制和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pragmatic and Observational Research
Pragmatic and Observational Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Pragmatic and Observational Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes data from studies designed to closely reflect medical interventions in real-world clinical practice, providing insights beyond classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While RCTs maximize internal validity for cause-and-effect relationships, they often represent only specific patient groups. This journal aims to complement such studies by providing data that better mirrors real-world patients and the usage of medicines, thus informing guidelines and enhancing the applicability of research findings across diverse patient populations encountered in everyday clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信