Emily L.L. Sin MSc , Chi-ngan Chow MSc , Roy T.H. Cheung PhD
{"title":"Relationship between personal psychological capitals, stress level, and performance in marathon runners","authors":"Emily L.L. Sin MSc , Chi-ngan Chow MSc , Roy T.H. Cheung PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Marathon runners experience different levels of stress from their performance, which may vary across different people.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study sought to examine if stress levels could be predicted by running performance and personal psychological capitals, including optimism and self-efficacy levels in marathon finishers. It also determined the contribution of each component in a stress prediction model.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An online questionnaire and comprised validated scales were used to measure runners' performance, perceived stress levels, and personal psychological capitals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A positive correlation between runner performance and perceived stress level (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.256, <em>p</em> = 0.019) was found, while the personal psychological capitals were negatively correlated to stress levels (r<sub>s</sub> = −0.580, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and (r<sub>s</sub> = −0.618, <em>p</em> < 0.001) respectively. Perceived stress levels were best predicted by personal psychological capitals (β = −0.322–−0.393, <em>p</em> = 0.001), but not running performance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggested that psychological factors affect stress levels the most, and marathon runners with a lower performance were more prone to stress than those who perform better.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"33 2","pages":"Pages 67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.03.002","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013702515000202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Background
Marathon runners experience different levels of stress from their performance, which may vary across different people.
Objectives
This study sought to examine if stress levels could be predicted by running performance and personal psychological capitals, including optimism and self-efficacy levels in marathon finishers. It also determined the contribution of each component in a stress prediction model.
Methods
An online questionnaire and comprised validated scales were used to measure runners' performance, perceived stress levels, and personal psychological capitals.
Results
A positive correlation between runner performance and perceived stress level (rs = 0.256, p = 0.019) was found, while the personal psychological capitals were negatively correlated to stress levels (rs = −0.580, p < 0.001) and (rs = −0.618, p < 0.001) respectively. Perceived stress levels were best predicted by personal psychological capitals (β = −0.322–−0.393, p = 0.001), but not running performance.
Conclusion
Our findings suggested that psychological factors affect stress levels the most, and marathon runners with a lower performance were more prone to stress than those who perform better.
期刊介绍:
The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is the official journal of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited (HKPA Ltd). This peer-reviewed journal aims to contribute to and document the advancements in the principles and practice of physiotherapy in Hong Kong.The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is published annually and papers are categorized into research reports, treatment reports, technical reports, literature reviews, and letters to the editor.