Pharmacists and medication reconciliation: a review of recent literature.

IF 2.1 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice Pub Date : 2019-04-30 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IPRP.S169727
Eesha Patel, Joshua M Pevnick, Korey A Kennelty
{"title":"Pharmacists and medication reconciliation: a review of recent literature.","authors":"Eesha Patel,&nbsp;Joshua M Pevnick,&nbsp;Korey A Kennelty","doi":"10.2147/IPRP.S169727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Adverse drug event (ADE) errors are common and costly in health care systems across the world. Medication reconciliation is a means to decrease these medication-related injuries and increase quality of care. Research has shown that medication reconciliation accuracy and efficiency improved when pharmacists are directly involved in the process. <b>Objective</b>: We review studies examining how pharmacists impact the medication reconciliation process and we discuss pharmacists' future roles during the medication reconciliation process and then barriers pharmacy staff may face during this critical process. <b>Methods</b>: A comprehensive literature search from MEDLINE and manual searching of bibliographies was performed for the time period January 2012 through November 2018. <b>Conclusion</b>: Although the issue of rising costs and injury due to medication errors in our health care system are not solvable via medication reconciliation alone, it is the first and perhaps most critical piece of the medication management puzzle. As such, numerous organizations have called for pharmacists to expand their roles in the medication reconciliation process due to their expertise in medication management.</p>","PeriodicalId":45655,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"39-45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/IPRP.S169727","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IPRP.S169727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Background: Adverse drug event (ADE) errors are common and costly in health care systems across the world. Medication reconciliation is a means to decrease these medication-related injuries and increase quality of care. Research has shown that medication reconciliation accuracy and efficiency improved when pharmacists are directly involved in the process. Objective: We review studies examining how pharmacists impact the medication reconciliation process and we discuss pharmacists' future roles during the medication reconciliation process and then barriers pharmacy staff may face during this critical process. Methods: A comprehensive literature search from MEDLINE and manual searching of bibliographies was performed for the time period January 2012 through November 2018. Conclusion: Although the issue of rising costs and injury due to medication errors in our health care system are not solvable via medication reconciliation alone, it is the first and perhaps most critical piece of the medication management puzzle. As such, numerous organizations have called for pharmacists to expand their roles in the medication reconciliation process due to their expertise in medication management.

药剂师与药物调和:近期文献综述。
背景:药物不良事件(ADE)错误在世界各地的医疗保健系统中很常见,而且代价高昂。药物调节是减少这些药物相关伤害和提高护理质量的一种手段。研究表明,药剂师直接参与药物对账过程,可以提高药物对账的准确性和效率。目的:我们回顾了药剂师如何影响药物对账过程的研究,并讨论了药剂师在药物对账过程中的未来角色,以及药房工作人员在这一关键过程中可能面临的障碍。方法:从MEDLINE进行2012年1月至2018年11月的综合文献检索和文献目录手动检索。结论:尽管在我们的医疗保健系统中,由于药物错误而导致的成本上升和伤害的问题不能仅通过药物调节来解决,但这是药物管理难题的第一块,也许也是最关键的一块。因此,由于药剂师在药物管理方面的专业知识,许多组织呼吁他们扩大在药物对账过程中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.40%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信