{"title":"Effect of Probing in Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children Older Than 2 Years.","authors":"Vaishali Lalit Une, Sushma Subhash Kulkarni, Varsha Sharad Nandedkar","doi":"10.3928/01913913-20190122-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the effect of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 2 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective interventional case series included 110 eyes of 94 patients with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) aged 2 years or older, with no previous intervention. The diagnosis was based on clinical findings (epiphora, discharge, regurgitation test, and fluorescein dye disappearance test). The children were divided into two groups: 2 to 5 years and 6 to 8 years. Probing of the nasolacrimal duct under general anesthesia was done. Success was predefined as resolution of symptoms and signs that persisted 3 months postoperatively. Another probing was done at 4 to 6 weeks when necessary before considering the final outcome as a failure. The chi-square test was used to analyze the result.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients' ages ranged from 2 to 8 years (average age: 55 months). Twenty-six (28%) patients needed a second probing. The overall success rate was 80%: 85% in the 2 to 5 years group and 73% in the 6 to 8 years group. The success rate was significantly lower in patients with complex obstruction (33.3%). The outcome of probing was not affected by the age of the patients (P = .2305).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Probing is a viable primary surgical option in CNLDO in older children and hence should not be withheld in children who are referred late. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2019;56(3):141-145.].</p>","PeriodicalId":519537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"141-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20190122-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the effect of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 2 years.
Methods: A prospective interventional case series included 110 eyes of 94 patients with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) aged 2 years or older, with no previous intervention. The diagnosis was based on clinical findings (epiphora, discharge, regurgitation test, and fluorescein dye disappearance test). The children were divided into two groups: 2 to 5 years and 6 to 8 years. Probing of the nasolacrimal duct under general anesthesia was done. Success was predefined as resolution of symptoms and signs that persisted 3 months postoperatively. Another probing was done at 4 to 6 weeks when necessary before considering the final outcome as a failure. The chi-square test was used to analyze the result.
Results: Patients' ages ranged from 2 to 8 years (average age: 55 months). Twenty-six (28%) patients needed a second probing. The overall success rate was 80%: 85% in the 2 to 5 years group and 73% in the 6 to 8 years group. The success rate was significantly lower in patients with complex obstruction (33.3%). The outcome of probing was not affected by the age of the patients (P = .2305).
Conclusions: Probing is a viable primary surgical option in CNLDO in older children and hence should not be withheld in children who are referred late. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2019;56(3):141-145.].