Improving food safety in the informal sector: nine years later.

Q1 Environmental Science
Infection Ecology and Epidemiology Pub Date : 2019-03-08 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20008686.2019.1579613
Delia Grace, Morenike Dipeolu, Silvia Alonso
{"title":"Improving food safety in the informal sector: nine years later.","authors":"Delia Grace,&nbsp;Morenike Dipeolu,&nbsp;Silvia Alonso","doi":"10.1080/20008686.2019.1579613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Foodborne disease is a major public health problem in poor countries, but we lack effective, sustainable and scalable approaches that work in the traditional, informal markets where most fresh, risky food is sold. A promising intervention is working with informal sector vendors to provide: a) training and technologies; b) an enabling environment; c) motivation for behaviour change. <b>Materials and methods:</b> We present a long-term follow-up of pilot project in one of the largest abattoirs and meat markets in Nigeria. An evaluation shortly after implementation found the intervention was acceptable, cost-effective and resulted in safer meat.  The follow-up nine years later using mixed methods: qualitative surveys and microbiological tests. <b>Results and Discussion:</b> The policy environment had become disabling, partly as a result of authorities attempts to move butchers to a modern, hygienic but more distant abattoir. This was resisted by the butchers. Authorities revoked the license for Bodija market and stopped providing services. Matters escalated and forceful attempts to remove butchers resulted in deaths followed by riots. Meat safety deteriorated. <b>Conclusion:</b> The case study shows the importance of an enabling environment and need for stakeholder collaboration in attempting to improve food safety in the traditional sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":37446,"journal":{"name":"Infection Ecology and Epidemiology","volume":"9 1","pages":"1579613"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20008686.2019.1579613","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Ecology and Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008686.2019.1579613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Introduction: Foodborne disease is a major public health problem in poor countries, but we lack effective, sustainable and scalable approaches that work in the traditional, informal markets where most fresh, risky food is sold. A promising intervention is working with informal sector vendors to provide: a) training and technologies; b) an enabling environment; c) motivation for behaviour change. Materials and methods: We present a long-term follow-up of pilot project in one of the largest abattoirs and meat markets in Nigeria. An evaluation shortly after implementation found the intervention was acceptable, cost-effective and resulted in safer meat.  The follow-up nine years later using mixed methods: qualitative surveys and microbiological tests. Results and Discussion: The policy environment had become disabling, partly as a result of authorities attempts to move butchers to a modern, hygienic but more distant abattoir. This was resisted by the butchers. Authorities revoked the license for Bodija market and stopped providing services. Matters escalated and forceful attempts to remove butchers resulted in deaths followed by riots. Meat safety deteriorated. Conclusion: The case study shows the importance of an enabling environment and need for stakeholder collaboration in attempting to improve food safety in the traditional sector.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

改善非正规部门的食品安全:九年后。
导言:食源性疾病是贫穷国家的一个重大公共卫生问题,但我们缺乏有效、可持续和可扩展的方法,这些方法在传统的非正式市场上有效,而这些市场上出售的是最新鲜、风险最大的食品。一个有希望的干预措施是与非正规部门供应商合作,提供:A)培训和技术;B)有利的环境;C)行为改变的动机。材料和方法:我们在尼日利亚最大的屠宰场和肉类市场之一提出了一个长期后续试点项目。实施后不久的评估发现,干预措施是可以接受的,具有成本效益,并导致更安全的肉类。9年后的随访使用了混合方法:定性调查和微生物测试。结果和讨论:政策环境已经变得残废,部分原因是当局试图将屠宰者转移到现代化、卫生但更遥远的屠宰场。这遭到了屠夫们的抵制。当局吊销了博迪加市场的营业执照,并停止提供服务。事态升级,强行驱逐屠夫的企图导致死亡,随后发生骚乱。肉类安全恶化。结论:该案例研究表明了一个有利环境的重要性,以及利益相关者在试图改善传统行业食品安全方面进行合作的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection Ecology and Epidemiology
Infection Ecology and Epidemiology Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Ecology & Epidemiology aims to stimulate inter-disciplinary collaborations dealing with a range of subjects, from the plethora of zoonotic infections in humans, over diseases with implication in wildlife ecology, to advanced virology and bacteriology. The journal specifically welcomes papers from studies where researchers from multiple medical and ecological disciplines are collaborating so as to increase our knowledge of the emergence, spread and effect of new and re-emerged infectious diseases in humans, domestic animals and wildlife. Main areas of interest include, but are not limited to: 1.Zoonotic microbioorganisms 2.Vector borne infections 3.Gastrointestinal pathogens 4.Antimicrobial resistance 5.Zoonotic microbioorganisms in changing environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信