Managing older medical patients in hospital: a study of the outcomes from a shift of resources to the 'front door'.

Divya Tiwari, Michael Vassallo, Charlotte Owen, Richard Renaut, Stephen Allen
{"title":"Managing older medical patients in hospital: a study of the outcomes from a shift of resources to the 'front door'.","authors":"Divya Tiwari,&nbsp;Michael Vassallo,&nbsp;Charlotte Owen,&nbsp;Richard Renaut,&nbsp;Stephen Allen","doi":"10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We performed a retrospective cohort comparison study to look at the processes for concentrating geriatric resources in the acute admissions area in a general hospital in the UK and compare key outcomes. The number of consultant geriatricians and other staff working at the 'front door' - acute medical unit (AMU) and short stay ward (SSW) - was increased. We compared 'front door' outcomes with whole department outcomes in 2013 and 2014, looking at the proportion of patients discharged within 3 and 5 days of admission, the proportion discharged from the 'front door', mean lengths of stay (LOS) and readmissions within 28 days of discharge. There were 1,147 and 1,381 discharge episodes in 2013 and 2014, respectively. 'Front door' discharges rose from 36% to 46% (p<0.001) between 2013 and 2014, and the proportion of 'front door' discharges occurring within 3 days rose from 56% (2013) to 68% (2014), compared with 35% and 33% for the department as a whole (p=0.006). The mean LOS at the 'front door' fell from 6.1 to 3.8 days (p=0.007). Readmissions from 'front door' discharges rose from 12% to 14% (p=0.004). The change in the configuration of the acute geriatric service was associated with more favourable discharge performance outcomes at the 'front door' but modest improvements in discharge performance for the geriatric service as a whole.</p>","PeriodicalId":92635,"journal":{"name":"Future hospital journal","volume":"3 3","pages":"174-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465802/pdf/futurehosp-3-3-174.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future hospital journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We performed a retrospective cohort comparison study to look at the processes for concentrating geriatric resources in the acute admissions area in a general hospital in the UK and compare key outcomes. The number of consultant geriatricians and other staff working at the 'front door' - acute medical unit (AMU) and short stay ward (SSW) - was increased. We compared 'front door' outcomes with whole department outcomes in 2013 and 2014, looking at the proportion of patients discharged within 3 and 5 days of admission, the proportion discharged from the 'front door', mean lengths of stay (LOS) and readmissions within 28 days of discharge. There were 1,147 and 1,381 discharge episodes in 2013 and 2014, respectively. 'Front door' discharges rose from 36% to 46% (p<0.001) between 2013 and 2014, and the proportion of 'front door' discharges occurring within 3 days rose from 56% (2013) to 68% (2014), compared with 35% and 33% for the department as a whole (p=0.006). The mean LOS at the 'front door' fell from 6.1 to 3.8 days (p=0.007). Readmissions from 'front door' discharges rose from 12% to 14% (p=0.004). The change in the configuration of the acute geriatric service was associated with more favourable discharge performance outcomes at the 'front door' but modest improvements in discharge performance for the geriatric service as a whole.

管理住院的老年患者:对资源转移到“前门”的结果的研究。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列比较研究,以了解英国一家综合医院在急性入院区集中老年医学资源的过程,并比较关键结果。在“前门”——急性医疗单元(AMU)和短期病房(SSW)——工作的老年病顾问和其他工作人员的数量有所增加。我们比较了2013年和2014年的“前门”结果与全科结果,观察了入院后3天和5天内出院的患者比例、从“前门”出院的比例、平均住院时间(LOS)和出院后28天内再次入院的情况。2013年和2014年分别有1147次和1381次出院前门的排放量从36%上升到46%(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信