TMA-93 for Diagnosing Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Comparison With the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test.

IF 2.7 4区医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias Pub Date : 2019-08-01 Epub Date: 2019-05-13 DOI:10.1177/1533317519848230

Silvia Rodrigo-Herrero, Cristóbal Carnero-Pardo, Carlota Méndez-Barrio, Miguel De Miguel-Tristancho, Eugenia Graciani-Cantisán, María Bernal Sánchez-Arjona, Didier Maillet, María Dolores Jiménez-Hernández, Emilio Franco-Macías

{"title":"TMA-93 for Diagnosing Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Comparison With the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test.","authors":"Silvia Rodrigo-Herrero, Cristóbal Carnero-Pardo, Carlota Méndez-Barrio, Miguel De Miguel-Tristancho, Eugenia Graciani-Cantisán, María Bernal Sánchez-Arjona, Didier Maillet, María Dolores Jiménez-Hernández, Emilio Franco-Macías","doi":"10.1177/1533317519848230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: TMA-93 examines binding by images, an advantage for the less educated individuals.Aim: To compare the discriminative validity of TMA-93 against the picture version of Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) to distinguish patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) from normal controls (NCs) without excluding less educated individuals.Methods: Design: Phase I diagnostic evaluation study.Participants: A total of 30 patients with aMCI and 30 NCs matched for sociodemographics variables.Statistical analysis: The diagnostic accuracy for each test was calculated by conducting receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Hanley and McNeil method was used to compare diagnostic accuracy of different tests on the same sample.Results: Up to 41.7% of the sample had less than a first grade of education. Both tests showed excellent diagnostic accuracy. The comparisons did not show significant differences.Conclusions: TMA-93 is so accurate as FCSRT to differentiate aMCI from controls including less educated individuals. The test could be considered as a choice in this sociodemographic context.","PeriodicalId":50816,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias","volume":"34 5","pages":"322-328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10852447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317519848230","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: TMA-93 examines binding by images, an advantage for the less educated individuals.

Aim: To compare the discriminative validity of TMA-93 against the picture version of Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) to distinguish patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) from normal controls (NCs) without excluding less educated individuals.

Methods:

Design: Phase I diagnostic evaluation study.

Participants: A total of 30 patients with aMCI and 30 NCs matched for sociodemographics variables.

Statistical analysis: The diagnostic accuracy for each test was calculated by conducting receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Hanley and McNeil method was used to compare diagnostic accuracy of different tests on the same sample.

Results: Up to 41.7% of the sample had less than a first grade of education. Both tests showed excellent diagnostic accuracy. The comparisons did not show significant differences.

Conclusions: TMA-93 is so accurate as FCSRT to differentiate aMCI from controls including less educated individuals. The test could be considered as a choice in this sociodemographic context.

查看原文本刊更多论文

用于诊断失忆性轻度认知障碍的 TMA-93：与自由选择性记忆测试和诱导选择性记忆测试的比较。

背景：目的：比较 TMA-93 与图片版自由和诱导选择性记忆测试（FCSRT）的鉴别有效性，以区分失忆性轻度认知障碍（aMCI）患者和正常对照组（NCs），同时不排除教育程度较低者：设计：I期诊断评估研究：方法：设计：I期诊断评估研究：统计分析：统计分析：通过接收者操作特征曲线分析计算每项测试的诊断准确性。汉利和麦克尼尔法用于比较不同检测方法对同一样本的诊断准确性：结果：41.7%的样本受教育程度低于一年级。两种测试都显示出极佳的诊断准确性。比较结果未显示显著差异：结论：TMA-93 与 FCSRT 在区分 aMCI 与对照组（包括受教育程度较低者）方面具有同样的准确性。在这种社会人口背景下，该测试可作为一种选择。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： American Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease and other Dementias® (AJADD) is for professionals on the frontlines of Alzheimer''s care, dementia, and clinical depression--especially physicians, nurses, psychiatrists, administrators, and other healthcare specialists who manage patients with dementias and their families. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).