Ridge Architecture Preservation Following Minimally Traumatic Exodontia Techniques and Guided Tissue Regeneration.

3区 医学 Q1 Dentistry
Paula Gabriela Faciola Pessôa de Oliveira, Edmara Tatiely Pedroso Bergamo, Dimorvan Bordin, Leticia Arbex, Danielle Konrad, Luiz Fernando Gil, Rodrigo Neiva, Nick Tovar, Lukasz Witek, Paulo Guilherme Coelho
{"title":"Ridge Architecture Preservation Following Minimally Traumatic Exodontia Techniques and Guided Tissue Regeneration.","authors":"Paula Gabriela Faciola Pessôa de Oliveira, Edmara Tatiely Pedroso Bergamo, Dimorvan Bordin, Leticia Arbex, Danielle Konrad, Luiz Fernando Gil, Rodrigo Neiva, Nick Tovar, Lukasz Witek, Paulo Guilherme Coelho","doi":"10.1097/ID.0000000000000886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo compare hard-tissue healing after 3 exodontia approaches.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nPremolars of dogs were extracted: (1) flapless, (2) flap, and (3) flap + socket coverage with polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) nonresorbable membrane (flap + dPTFE). Animals were euthanized at 1 and 4 weeks. Amount of bone formation within socket and socket total area were measured.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAmount of bone formation revealed significant difference between 1 and 4 weeks; however, there was no differences among groups. Socket total area decreased after 4 weeks, and the flap + dPTFE group showed significantly higher socket total area. As a function of time and group, flap + dPTFE 4 weeks presented similar socket total area values relative to flap + dPTFE at 1 week, and significantly higher socket total area than flapless and flap. The histological sections revealed almost no bone formation within socket after 1 week, which increased for all groups at 4 weeks.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nSocket coverage with polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) membrane showed to effectively preserve bone architecture. Bone formation within sockets was not influenced by tooth extraction technique.","PeriodicalId":13309,"journal":{"name":"Implant Dentistry","volume":"28 4","pages":"319-328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ID.0000000000000886","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000886","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare hard-tissue healing after 3 exodontia approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS Premolars of dogs were extracted: (1) flapless, (2) flap, and (3) flap + socket coverage with polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) nonresorbable membrane (flap + dPTFE). Animals were euthanized at 1 and 4 weeks. Amount of bone formation within socket and socket total area were measured. RESULTS Amount of bone formation revealed significant difference between 1 and 4 weeks; however, there was no differences among groups. Socket total area decreased after 4 weeks, and the flap + dPTFE group showed significantly higher socket total area. As a function of time and group, flap + dPTFE 4 weeks presented similar socket total area values relative to flap + dPTFE at 1 week, and significantly higher socket total area than flapless and flap. The histological sections revealed almost no bone formation within socket after 1 week, which increased for all groups at 4 weeks. CONCLUSION Socket coverage with polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) membrane showed to effectively preserve bone architecture. Bone formation within sockets was not influenced by tooth extraction technique.
微创外植牙技术和引导组织再生后的脊结构保护。
目的:比较三种外牙入路后硬组织愈合情况。材料和方法:取犬前磨牙:(1)无瓣,(2)瓣,(3)瓣+窝盖聚四氟乙烯(dPTFE)不可吸收膜(瓣+ dPTFE)。分别于第1周和第4周对动物实施安乐死。测量窝内成骨量及窝内总面积。结果:1周与4周骨形成量差异有统计学意义;然而,各组之间没有差异。4周后窝总面积减少,皮瓣+ dPTFE组窝总面积明显增加。作为时间和组的函数,皮瓣+ dPTFE 4周与皮瓣+ dPTFE 1周的窝总面积值相似,且窝总面积明显高于无皮瓣和皮瓣。组织学切片显示1周后窝内几乎没有骨形成,4周时各组骨形成增加。结论:用聚四氟乙烯(dPTFE)膜覆盖骨槽能有效保护骨结构。牙槽骨形成不受拔牙技术的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Implant Dentistry
Implant Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation. Implant Dentistry, an interdisciplinary forum for general practitioners, specialists, educators, and researchers, publishes relevant clinical, educational, and research articles that document current concepts of oral implantology in sections on biomaterials, clinical reports, oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral pathology, periodontics, prosthodontics, and research. The journal includes guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, abstracts of current literature, and news of sponsoring societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信