Renal Function Estimates and Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Stroke Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: An Observational Study.

Q3 Medicine
Acta neurologica Taiwanica Pub Date : 2018-06-15
Yen-Ting Chen, Huey-Juan Lin
{"title":"Renal Function Estimates and Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Stroke Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: An Observational Study.","authors":"Yen-Ting Chen,&nbsp;Huey-Juan Lin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Appropriate dosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) requires consideration of renal function. Discordance between commonly used estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and creatinine clearance (CrCl) might affect the dosing appropriateness in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to explore the effect of renal function estimates on the dosing patterns in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a hospital-based stroke registry, we identified consecutive patients between 2014 and 2017 who were hospitalized for acute stroke, had AF, and started DOACs within 90 days after stroke. We compared the difference between eGFR and CrCl in assessing appropriateness of dosage. Effectiveness and safety outcomes were verified by chart review, and event rates were presented as per 100 person-years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the156 patients with mean age 74±11 years, 72 (46%) were prescribed dabigatran and 84 (54%) rivaroxaban. Substituting eGFR for CrCl would have 55% (37/67) of patients with CrCl less than 50 mL/min and 89% (8/9) of patients with CrCl less than 30 mL/min not correctly classified, and potentially lead to overdosing. The misclassification would cause underdosing in 6% (5/89) of patients with CrCl ≥50 mL/min and 1% (1/147) of patients with CrCl ≥30 mL/min. In reality, the substitution resulted in reduction of overdosing from 10% to 4% for dabigatran and from 2% to 1% for rivaroxaban; underdosing increased from 17% to 26% for rivaroxaban. After median follow-up of 17 months, 33 patients developed outcomes including 21 major bleedings. The event rate was 6.9% per year (95% CI, 4.1%-11.4%) for effectiveness, and 9.6% per year (95% CI, 6.3%-14.8%) for safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although substituting eGFR for CrCl carries potential risks of DOAC overdosing in patients with AF, the effect might be offset by clinicians' predilection for lower dosage in this stroke cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":7102,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Taiwanica","volume":"27(2) ","pages":"39-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Taiwanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Appropriate dosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) requires consideration of renal function. Discordance between commonly used estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and creatinine clearance (CrCl) might affect the dosing appropriateness in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to explore the effect of renal function estimates on the dosing patterns in a real-world setting.

Methods: Using a hospital-based stroke registry, we identified consecutive patients between 2014 and 2017 who were hospitalized for acute stroke, had AF, and started DOACs within 90 days after stroke. We compared the difference between eGFR and CrCl in assessing appropriateness of dosage. Effectiveness and safety outcomes were verified by chart review, and event rates were presented as per 100 person-years.

Results: Of the156 patients with mean age 74±11 years, 72 (46%) were prescribed dabigatran and 84 (54%) rivaroxaban. Substituting eGFR for CrCl would have 55% (37/67) of patients with CrCl less than 50 mL/min and 89% (8/9) of patients with CrCl less than 30 mL/min not correctly classified, and potentially lead to overdosing. The misclassification would cause underdosing in 6% (5/89) of patients with CrCl ≥50 mL/min and 1% (1/147) of patients with CrCl ≥30 mL/min. In reality, the substitution resulted in reduction of overdosing from 10% to 4% for dabigatran and from 2% to 1% for rivaroxaban; underdosing increased from 17% to 26% for rivaroxaban. After median follow-up of 17 months, 33 patients developed outcomes including 21 major bleedings. The event rate was 6.9% per year (95% CI, 4.1%-11.4%) for effectiveness, and 9.6% per year (95% CI, 6.3%-14.8%) for safety.

Conclusion: Although substituting eGFR for CrCl carries potential risks of DOAC overdosing in patients with AF, the effect might be offset by clinicians' predilection for lower dosage in this stroke cohort.

脑卒中合并心房颤动患者的肾功能评估和直接口服抗凝剂的剂量:一项观察性研究。
目的:直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)的适当剂量需要考虑肾功能。常用估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和肌酐清除率(CrCl)之间的不一致可能影响卒中合并心房颤动(AF)患者给药的适宜性。我们的目的是在现实环境中探讨肾功能评估对给药模式的影响。方法:使用基于医院的卒中登记,我们确定了2014年至2017年期间因急性卒中住院、患有房颤并在卒中后90天内开始doac的连续患者。我们比较了eGFR和CrCl在评估剂量适宜性方面的差异。通过图表审查验证有效性和安全性结果,事件发生率以每100人年为单位。结果:156例患者平均年龄为74±11岁,其中72例(46%)使用达比加群,84例(54%)使用利伐沙班。用eGFR替代CrCl会导致55%(37/67)的CrCl小于50 mL/min的患者和89%(8/9)的CrCl小于30 mL/min的患者分类不正确,并可能导致过量用药。在CrCl≥50 mL/min的患者中,6%(5/89)的患者和1%(1/147)的CrCl≥30 mL/min的患者中,错误分类会导致剂量不足。实际上,替代导致达比加群的过量用量从10%减少到4%,利伐沙班的过量用量从2%减少到1%;利伐沙班的剂量不足从17%增加到26%。中位随访17个月后,33例患者出现预后,包括21例大出血。有效性的事件发生率为每年6.9% (95% CI, 4.1%-11.4%),安全性的事件发生率为每年9.6% (95% CI, 6.3%-14.8%)。结论:尽管在房颤患者中,用eGFR替代CrCl存在DOAC过量的潜在风险,但在该卒中队列中,临床医生倾向于使用较低的剂量,可能会抵消这种影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta neurologica Taiwanica
Acta neurologica Taiwanica Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信