Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography Results.

IF 2.3 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology Pub Date : 2019-03-31 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179546819838232
Shigenori Ito, Kanako Kinoshita, Akiko Endo, Masato Nakamura
{"title":"Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography Results.","authors":"Shigenori Ito, Kanako Kinoshita, Akiko Endo, Masato Nakamura","doi":"10.1177/1179546819838232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluated intra- and interobserver variability of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) due to cine frame selection for 9 coronary stenoses. The projection was selected in advance. Cine frames were selected by 2 blinded experts (blind frame QCA) followed by assignment by supervisor (pre-selected frame QCA). Each expert analyzed 18 frames twice with a 3-month interval. A total of 72 measurements by 2 experts were used for intra- and interobserver variability analysis in calibration factor (CF), minimal lumen diameter (MLD), percent diameter stenosis (%DS), interpolated reference diameter (Int R), and lesion length (LL). Accuracy, precision, and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated based on 2 measurements. For interobserver variability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was evaluated. Regarding intraobserver variability, precision (CV) was 0.0026 (1.45), 0.220 (25.1), 0.282 (11.0), 7.626 (11.8), and 4.042 (28.7) for blind frame QCA and 0.0044 (2.46), 0.094 (11.2), 0.225 (8.6), 3.924 (5.9), and 1.941 (12.1) for pre-selected frame QCA and regarding interobserver variability, precision (CV) was 0.0037 (2.09), 0.271 (31.8), 0.307 (11.9), 10.10 (15.4), and 5.121 (39.5) for blind frame QCA and 0.0050 (2.82), 0.098 (11.4), 0.246 (9.5), 5.253 (8.0), and 2.857 (19.0) for pre-selected frame QCA in CF, MLD, Int R, %DS, and LL, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient of Int R was almost perfect in blind and pre-selected frame QCA. Intraclass correlation coefficient of MLD, %DS, and LL were substantial/lower by blind frame QCA and improved to almost perfect by pre-selected frame QCA. Blind cine film selection might affect intra- and interobserver variability, especially in MLD and LL. In the multiple linear regression analysis, blind frame QCA was selected as an explanatory factor of QCA variability in MLD, %DS, and LL. The error range due to frame selection must be taken into consideration in clinical use.","PeriodicalId":10419,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology","volume":"13 ","pages":"1179546819838232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179546819838232","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179546819838232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We evaluated intra- and interobserver variability of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) due to cine frame selection for 9 coronary stenoses. The projection was selected in advance. Cine frames were selected by 2 blinded experts (blind frame QCA) followed by assignment by supervisor (pre-selected frame QCA). Each expert analyzed 18 frames twice with a 3-month interval. A total of 72 measurements by 2 experts were used for intra- and interobserver variability analysis in calibration factor (CF), minimal lumen diameter (MLD), percent diameter stenosis (%DS), interpolated reference diameter (Int R), and lesion length (LL). Accuracy, precision, and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated based on 2 measurements. For interobserver variability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was evaluated. Regarding intraobserver variability, precision (CV) was 0.0026 (1.45), 0.220 (25.1), 0.282 (11.0), 7.626 (11.8), and 4.042 (28.7) for blind frame QCA and 0.0044 (2.46), 0.094 (11.2), 0.225 (8.6), 3.924 (5.9), and 1.941 (12.1) for pre-selected frame QCA and regarding interobserver variability, precision (CV) was 0.0037 (2.09), 0.271 (31.8), 0.307 (11.9), 10.10 (15.4), and 5.121 (39.5) for blind frame QCA and 0.0050 (2.82), 0.098 (11.4), 0.246 (9.5), 5.253 (8.0), and 2.857 (19.0) for pre-selected frame QCA in CF, MLD, Int R, %DS, and LL, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient of Int R was almost perfect in blind and pre-selected frame QCA. Intraclass correlation coefficient of MLD, %DS, and LL were substantial/lower by blind frame QCA and improved to almost perfect by pre-selected frame QCA. Blind cine film selection might affect intra- and interobserver variability, especially in MLD and LL. In the multiple linear regression analysis, blind frame QCA was selected as an explanatory factor of QCA variability in MLD, %DS, and LL. The error range due to frame selection must be taken into consideration in clinical use.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

电影帧选择对定量冠状动脉造影结果的影响。
我们评估了定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)在9例冠状动脉狭窄的影像选择上的观察者内部和观察者之间的可变性。投影是事先选定的。电影帧由2位盲法专家选择(盲法帧QCA),然后由主管分配(预选帧QCA)。每位专家每隔3个月分析两次18帧。由2位专家进行的总共72次测量用于校准因子(CF)、最小管腔直径(MLD)、直径狭窄百分比(%DS)、内插参考直径(Int R)和病变长度(LL)的观察者内部和观察者之间的变异性分析。准确度、精密度和变异系数(CV)基于2个测量值计算。对于观察者间的变异,评估了类内相关系数(ICC)。对于观察者内变异,盲框QCA的精度(CV)分别为0.0026(1.45)、0.220(25.1)、0.282(11.0)、7.626(11.8)和4.042(28.7),对于预选框QCA的精度(CV)分别为0.0044(2.46)、0.094(11.2)、0.225(8.6)、3.924(5.9)和1.941(12.1)。对于观察者间变异,盲框QCA的精度(CV)分别为0.0037(2.09)、0.271(31.8)、0.307(11.9)、10.10(15.4)和5.121(39.5),以及0.0050(2.82)、0.098(11.4)、0.246(9.5)、5.253(8.0)。CF、MLD、Int R、%DS和LL中预选帧QCA分别为2.857(19.0)。盲法和预选框QCA的类内相关系数均接近完美。盲框QCA使MLD、%DS和LL的类内相关系数显著或较低,而预选框QCA使MLD、%DS和LL的类内相关系数几乎达到完美。盲选电影可能会影响观察者内部和观察者之间的可变性,尤其是在MLD和LL中。在多元线性回归分析中,选择盲框QCA作为MLD、%DS和LL中QCA变异的解释因素。在临床使用中必须考虑到镜框选择的误差范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology
Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信