Evaluation of Virex® II 256 and Virex® Tb as Disinfectants of the Dimorphic Fungi Coccidioides immitis and Coccidioides posadasii.

Natalie M Mitchell, D Mitchell Magee, Thomas E Grys, Douglas F Lake
{"title":"Evaluation of Virex® II 256 and Virex® Tb as Disinfectants of the Dimorphic Fungi Coccidioides immitis and <i>Coccidioides posadasii</i>.","authors":"Natalie M Mitchell,&nbsp;D Mitchell Magee,&nbsp;Thomas E Grys,&nbsp;Douglas F Lake","doi":"10.1177/1535676018818560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To date, limited published data exists regarding the efficacy of commonly used disinfectants in inactivating the Risk Group 3 dimorphic fungal pathogens, <i>Coccidioides immitis</i> and <i>Coccidioides posadasii</i>. Newer generation quaternary ammonium compounds, like Virex® II 256 and Virex® Tb, have not been previously evaluated. Herein, these disinfectants are evaluated against 10% bleach and 70% ethanol, for their ability to inactivate 5×10<sup>7</sup> arthroconidial spores of <i>C. immitis</i> RS or <i>C. posadasii</i> strain Silveira within 2, 5, 10 or 20 minutes contact time in aqueous solution. Evidence is provided that both Virex® II 256 and Virex® Tb are highly effective alternatives to 10% bleach or 70% ethanol for the disinfection of 5×10<sup>7</sup> arthroconidia of <i>Coccidioides spp</i>. within 2 minutes of contact time. 70% ethanol was seen as less effective in killing <i>C.immitis RS</i> arthroconidia and both 70% ethanol and 10% bleach were seen as less effective than the other disinfectants in killing <i>C. posadasii</i> strain Silveira, as longer contact times were required to completely inactivate the same number of arthroconidia.</p>","PeriodicalId":520561,"journal":{"name":"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association","volume":" ","pages":"30-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1535676018818560","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1535676018818560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

To date, limited published data exists regarding the efficacy of commonly used disinfectants in inactivating the Risk Group 3 dimorphic fungal pathogens, Coccidioides immitis and Coccidioides posadasii. Newer generation quaternary ammonium compounds, like Virex® II 256 and Virex® Tb, have not been previously evaluated. Herein, these disinfectants are evaluated against 10% bleach and 70% ethanol, for their ability to inactivate 5×107 arthroconidial spores of C. immitis RS or C. posadasii strain Silveira within 2, 5, 10 or 20 minutes contact time in aqueous solution. Evidence is provided that both Virex® II 256 and Virex® Tb are highly effective alternatives to 10% bleach or 70% ethanol for the disinfection of 5×107 arthroconidia of Coccidioides spp. within 2 minutes of contact time. 70% ethanol was seen as less effective in killing C.immitis RS arthroconidia and both 70% ethanol and 10% bleach were seen as less effective than the other disinfectants in killing C. posadasii strain Silveira, as longer contact times were required to completely inactivate the same number of arthroconidia.

Abstract Image

Virex®II 256和Virex®Tb对二态真菌球孢子虫和波萨达孢子虫的杀菌剂评价。
迄今为止,关于常用消毒剂灭活风险组3二态真菌病原体——免疫球孢子虫和波萨达球孢子虫的有效性的公开数据有限。新一代季铵化合物,如Virex®II 256和Virex®Tb,以前没有进行过评估。在此,这些消毒剂在10%漂白剂和70%乙醇的作用下进行了评估,以评估它们在水溶液中接触2、5、10或20分钟内灭活C. immitis RS或C. posadasii菌株Silveira的5×107关节分生孢子的能力。有证据表明,Virex®II 256和Virex®Tb都是10%漂白剂或70%乙醇的高效替代品,可在2分钟接触时间内消毒球虫属5×107关节孢子。70%乙醇被认为在杀死C. imimtis RS arthroconidia方面效果较差,70%乙醇和10%漂白剂被认为在杀死C. posadasii Silveira菌株方面效果不如其他消毒剂,因为完全灭活相同数量的关节孢子需要更长的接触时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信