Using Tox21 High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Evaluation of Botanical and Dietary Supplements.

Q2 Health Professions
Applied In Vitro Toxicology Pub Date : 2019-03-01 Epub Date: 2019-03-09 DOI:10.1089/aivt.2018.0020
Troy D Hubbard, Jui-Hua Hsieh, Cynthia V Rider, Nisha S Sipes, Alexander Sedykh, Bradley J Collins, Scott S Auerbach, Menghang Xia, Ruili Huang, Nigel J Walker, Michael J DeVito
{"title":"Using Tox21 High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Evaluation of Botanical and Dietary Supplements.","authors":"Troy D Hubbard, Jui-Hua Hsieh, Cynthia V Rider, Nisha S Sipes, Alexander Sedykh, Bradley J Collins, Scott S Auerbach, Menghang Xia, Ruili Huang, Nigel J Walker, Michael J DeVito","doi":"10.1089/aivt.2018.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Recent nationwide surveys found that natural products, including botanical dietary supplements, are used by ∼18% of adults. In many cases, there is a paucity of toxicological data available for these substances to allow for confident evaluations of product safety. The National Toxicology Program (NTP) has received numerous nominations from the public and federal agencies to study the toxicological effects of botanical dietary supplements. The NTP sought to evaluate the utility of <i>in vitro</i> quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) assays for toxicological assessment of botanical and dietary supplements. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> In brief, concentration-response assessments of 90 test substances, including 13 distinct botanical species, and individual purported active constituents were evaluated using a subset of the Tox21 qHTS testing panel. The screen included 20 different endpoints that covered a broad range of biologically relevant signaling pathways to detect test article effects upon endocrine activity, nuclear receptor signaling, stress response signaling, genotoxicity, and cell death signaling. <b><i>Results and Discussion:</i></b> Botanical dietary supplement extracts induced measurable and diverse activity. Elevated biological activity profiles were observed following treatments with individual chemical constituents relative to their associated botanical extract. The overall distribution of activity was comparable to activities exhibited by compounds present in the Tox21 10K chemical library. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Botanical supplements did not exhibit minimal or idiosyncratic activities that would preclude the use of qHTS platforms as a feasible method to screen this class of compounds. However, there are still many considerations and further development required when attempting to use <i>in vitro</i> qHTS methods to characterize the safety profile of botanical/dietary supplements.</p>","PeriodicalId":37448,"journal":{"name":"Applied In Vitro Toxicology","volume":"5 1","pages":"10-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied In Vitro Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/aivt.2018.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recent nationwide surveys found that natural products, including botanical dietary supplements, are used by ∼18% of adults. In many cases, there is a paucity of toxicological data available for these substances to allow for confident evaluations of product safety. The National Toxicology Program (NTP) has received numerous nominations from the public and federal agencies to study the toxicological effects of botanical dietary supplements. The NTP sought to evaluate the utility of in vitro quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) assays for toxicological assessment of botanical and dietary supplements. Materials and Methods: In brief, concentration-response assessments of 90 test substances, including 13 distinct botanical species, and individual purported active constituents were evaluated using a subset of the Tox21 qHTS testing panel. The screen included 20 different endpoints that covered a broad range of biologically relevant signaling pathways to detect test article effects upon endocrine activity, nuclear receptor signaling, stress response signaling, genotoxicity, and cell death signaling. Results and Discussion: Botanical dietary supplement extracts induced measurable and diverse activity. Elevated biological activity profiles were observed following treatments with individual chemical constituents relative to their associated botanical extract. The overall distribution of activity was comparable to activities exhibited by compounds present in the Tox21 10K chemical library. Conclusion: Botanical supplements did not exhibit minimal or idiosyncratic activities that would preclude the use of qHTS platforms as a feasible method to screen this class of compounds. However, there are still many considerations and further development required when attempting to use in vitro qHTS methods to characterize the safety profile of botanical/dietary supplements.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用 Tox21 高通量筛选测定法评估植物补充剂和膳食补充剂。
导言:最近的全国性调查发现,18% 的成年人使用天然产品,包括植物膳食补充剂。在许多情况下,这些物质的毒理学数据很少,因此无法对产品的安全性进行可靠的评估。国家毒理学计划(NTP)收到了来自公众和联邦机构的大量提名,要求研究植物膳食补充剂的毒理学影响。NTP 试图评估体外定量高通量筛选 (qHTS) 方法在植物和膳食补充剂毒理学评估中的实用性。材料和方法:简而言之,使用 Tox21 qHTS 测试面板的一个子集对 90 种测试物质(包括 13 种不同的植物品种)和个别声称的活性成分进行了浓度-反应评估。筛选包括 20 个不同的终点,涵盖了广泛的生物相关信号传导途径,以检测受试物质对内分泌活性、核受体信号传导、应激反应信号传导、遗传毒性和细胞死亡信号传导的影响。结果与讨论植物膳食补充剂提取物具有可测量的多种活性。与相关植物提取物相比,在使用个别化学成分处理后,观察到生物活性曲线升高。活性的总体分布与 Tox21 10K 化学物质库中化合物的活性相当。结论植物补充剂并没有表现出最小或特异的活性,这并不妨碍使用 qHTS 平台作为筛选这类化合物的可行方法。不过,在尝试使用体外 qHTS 方法鉴定植物/膳食补充剂的安全性概况时,仍有许多注意事项和需要进一步开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied In Vitro Toxicology
Applied In Vitro Toxicology Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Applied In Vitro Toxicology is a peer-reviewed journal providing the latest research on the application of alternative in vitro testing methods for predicting adverse effects in the pharmaceutical, chemical, and personal care industries. This Journal aims to address important issues facing the various chemical industries, including regulatory requirements; the reduction, refinement, and replacement of animal testing; new screening methods; evaluation of new cell and tissue models; and the most appropriate methods for assessing safety and satisfying regulatory demands. The Journal also delivers the latest views and opinions of developers of new models, end users of the models, academic laboratories that are inventing new tools, and regulatory agencies in the United States, Europe, Latin America, Australia and Asia. Applied In Vitro Toxicology is the journal that scientists involved with hazard identification and risk assessment will read to understand how new and existing in vitro methods are applied, and the questions for which these models provide answers. Applied In Vitro Toxicology coverage includes: -Applied in vitro toxicology industry standards -New technologies developed for applied in vitro toxicology -Data acquisition, cleaning, distribution, and best practices -Data protection, privacy, and policy -Business interests from research to product -The changing role of in vitro toxicology -Visualization and design principles of applied in vitro toxicology infrastructures -Physical interfaces and robotics -Opportunities around applied in vitro toxicology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信