'Something wasn't quite right': a novel phenomenological analysis of internet discussion posts detailing initial awareness of psychosis.

Q4 Medicine
Amanda Spikol, Jamie Murphy
{"title":"'Something wasn't quite right': a novel phenomenological analysis of internet discussion posts detailing initial awareness of psychosis.","authors":"Amanda Spikol, Jamie Murphy","doi":"10.3371/CSRP.SPJM.032819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A significant number of psychosis studies have focussed on and have attempted to model and frame the earliest psychosis experiences. Using a wide array of methodologies and targeting a variety of 'at risk' groups, researchers have offered much to inform our treatment responses, and understanding of psychosis onset and development.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Due to the nature of scientific investigation however and investigator led exploration, those who experience psychosis are rarely afforded ultimate free rein to dictate and direct the exchange of information or to impose their unique narrative on that which is being explored. In an attempt to address this, the current study opportunistically harvested rich self-report data from replies to the question, \"People that have been diagnosed with schizophrenia, what was the first time you noticed something wasn't quite right?\" on the internet discussion forum Reddit.com.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>User data was analysed using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis to identify key themes in participants' first experiences and initial awareness of psychosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While respondents varied widely in their recounted experiences and chose to describe these experiences in a variety of ways, analysis showed that (i) respondent distress was associated with psychosis onset timeframe, negative-voice auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoid delusions, and insight (ii) early childhood psychosis experience resulted in novel explanatory schemas and psychosis/distress progression with contributory factors in adolescence and (iii) 41.3% of the sample reported self-realisation in gaining insight and greater insight was associated with help-seeking behaviour.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel use of publicly shared experiential data might enrich our existing qualitative literature concerning early psychosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":40019,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3371/CSRP.SPJM.032819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A significant number of psychosis studies have focussed on and have attempted to model and frame the earliest psychosis experiences. Using a wide array of methodologies and targeting a variety of 'at risk' groups, researchers have offered much to inform our treatment responses, and understanding of psychosis onset and development.

Objectives: Due to the nature of scientific investigation however and investigator led exploration, those who experience psychosis are rarely afforded ultimate free rein to dictate and direct the exchange of information or to impose their unique narrative on that which is being explored. In an attempt to address this, the current study opportunistically harvested rich self-report data from replies to the question, "People that have been diagnosed with schizophrenia, what was the first time you noticed something wasn't quite right?" on the internet discussion forum Reddit.com.

Methods: User data was analysed using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis to identify key themes in participants' first experiences and initial awareness of psychosis.

Results: While respondents varied widely in their recounted experiences and chose to describe these experiences in a variety of ways, analysis showed that (i) respondent distress was associated with psychosis onset timeframe, negative-voice auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoid delusions, and insight (ii) early childhood psychosis experience resulted in novel explanatory schemas and psychosis/distress progression with contributory factors in adolescence and (iii) 41.3% of the sample reported self-realisation in gaining insight and greater insight was associated with help-seeking behaviour.

Conclusions: This novel use of publicly shared experiential data might enrich our existing qualitative literature concerning early psychosis.

有些事情不太对劲":对详细描述最初意识到精神病的网络讨论帖子进行新颖的现象学分析。
导言:大量的精神病研究都集中在最早的精神病经历上,并试图建立模型和框架。研究人员使用各种方法,针对各种 "高危 "群体,为我们的治疗对策以及对精神病发病和发展的理解提供了大量信息:然而,由于科学调查的性质和调查者主导的探索,那些经历过精神病的人很少有机会最终自由地支配和指导信息交流,或将他们独特的叙述强加给正在探索的问题。为了解决这个问题,本研究从互联网讨论论坛 Reddit.com 上对 "被诊断为精神分裂症的人,你第一次发现事情不对劲是什么时候?"这一问题的回复中收集了丰富的自我报告数据:采用解释现象学分析法对用户数据进行分析,以确定参与者的初次经历和对精神病的初步认识的关键主题:虽然受访者讲述的经历千差万别,并选择以不同的方式来描述这些经历,但分析结果显示:(i) 受访者的痛苦与精神病发病时间、负性声音幻听、幻视、偏执性妄想和洞察力有关;(ii) 童年早期的精神病经历导致了新的解释模式,而精神病/痛苦的发展与青少年时期的诱因有关;(iii) 41.3% 的样本报告了在获得洞察力方面的自我实现,而更高的洞察力与求助行为有关:这种公开共享经验数据的新方法可能会丰富我们现有的有关早期精神病的定性文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses
Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The vision of the exciting new peer-reviewed quarterly publication Clinical Schizophrenia & Related Psychoses (CS) is to provide psychiatrists and other healthcare professionals with the latest research and advances in the diagnosis and treatment of schizophrenia and related psychoses. CS is a practice-oriented publication focused exclusively on the newest research findings, guidelines, treatment protocols, and clinical trials relevant to patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信