Agreement of clinical examination for low back pain with facet joint origin.

Pub Date : 2018-12-01 Epub Date: 2018-08-14 DOI:10.1142/S1013702518500105
Mantana Vongsirinavarat, Wahyuddin Wahyuddin, Ratchaneewan Adisaiphaopan
{"title":"Agreement of clinical examination for low back pain with facet joint origin.","authors":"Mantana Vongsirinavarat,&nbsp;Wahyuddin Wahyuddin,&nbsp;Ratchaneewan Adisaiphaopan","doi":"10.1142/S1013702518500105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) with facet joint origin is a common diagnosis of patients referred to physical therapy clinic. An expert consensus of diagnostic criteria has been proposed. However, the reliability of the assessment has not been proved.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the degrees of agreement between two physical therapists for nine physical examination items and the diagnosis of facet joint origin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The examination according to diagnostic criteria was performed independently by two physical therapists in 45 patients with chronic LBP. The percent agreements and Kappa coefficients of each examination item and diagnostic conclusion were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percent agreements of nine examined items ranged from 73.3-91.1%. The Kappa coefficients, widely ranged from 0.250-0.690 ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>48</mn></math> to <math><mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ), showed statistically significant agreements for all examination items. The low level of agreements was partly due to improper distributions of test results. The agreement of conclusion was 86.7% and Kappa coefficient was 0.492 ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ) which reflected good agreement of facet diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were adequate agreements for clinical examination of LBP with facet joint origin. The low level of agreement suggested the clinicians to have operational definition and rigorous training sessions although the examinations seemed to be routinely performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S1013702518500105","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702518500105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) with facet joint origin is a common diagnosis of patients referred to physical therapy clinic. An expert consensus of diagnostic criteria has been proposed. However, the reliability of the assessment has not been proved.

Objective: To test the degrees of agreement between two physical therapists for nine physical examination items and the diagnosis of facet joint origin.

Methods: The examination according to diagnostic criteria was performed independently by two physical therapists in 45 patients with chronic LBP. The percent agreements and Kappa coefficients of each examination item and diagnostic conclusion were calculated.

Results: The percent agreements of nine examined items ranged from 73.3-91.1%. The Kappa coefficients, widely ranged from 0.250-0.690 ( p = 0 . 48 to < 0 . 001 ), showed statistically significant agreements for all examination items. The low level of agreements was partly due to improper distributions of test results. The agreement of conclusion was 86.7% and Kappa coefficient was 0.492 ( p = 0 . 001 ) which reflected good agreement of facet diagnosis.

Conclusion: There were adequate agreements for clinical examination of LBP with facet joint origin. The low level of agreement suggested the clinicians to have operational definition and rigorous training sessions although the examinations seemed to be routinely performed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享
查看原文
以小关节起源的腰痛的临床检查的一致性。
背景:腰痛(LBP)与小关节起源是一个常见的诊断病人转介到物理治疗诊所。已经提出了专家共识的诊断标准。然而,评估的可靠性尚未得到证实。目的:测试两名物理治疗师对9项体格检查项目与小关节起源诊断的一致性程度。方法:45例慢性腰痛患者由2名物理治疗师独立按照诊断标准进行检查。计算各检查项目与诊断结论的符合率和Kappa系数。结果:9个检查项目的满意率为73.3% ~ 91.1%。Kappa系数范围为0.250 ~ 0.690 (p = 0。48比0。001),显示所有检查项目的统计显著一致性。一致性低的部分原因是测试结果分配不当。结论一致性为86.7%,Kappa系数为0.492 (p = 0)。001),这反映了关节突诊断的良好一致性。结论:以小关节为起始点的腰痛的临床检查有充分的一致性。低水平的一致性建议临床医生有操作性的定义和严格的培训课程,尽管检查似乎是常规执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信