Effectiveness of robotic-assisted gait training in stroke rehabilitation: A retrospective matched control study

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
Bryan Ping Ho Chung MSc in Health Care
{"title":"Effectiveness of robotic-assisted gait training in stroke rehabilitation: A retrospective matched control study","authors":"Bryan Ping Ho Chung MSc in Health Care","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) in improving functional outcomes among stroke patients.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This was a retrospective matched control study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>This study was conducted in an extended inpatient rehabilitation centre.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and intervention</h3><p>There were 14 patients with subacute stroke (4–31 days after stroke) in the RAGT group. Apart from traditional physiotherapy, the RAGT group received RAGT. The number of sessions for RAGT ranged from five to 33, and the frequency was three to five sessions per week, with each session lasting for 15–30 minutes. In the control group, there were 27 subacute stroke patients who were matched with the RAGT group in terms of age, days since stroke, premorbid ambulatory level, functional outcomes at admission, length of training, and number of physiotherapy sessions received. The control group received traditional physiotherapy but not RAGT.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>Modified Functional Ambulation Category (MFAC), Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (MRMI), Berg's Balance Scale (BBS), and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) to measure ambulation, mobility, balance, and activities of daily living, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both RAGT and control groups had significant within-group improvement in MFAC, MRMI, BBS, and MBI. However, the RAGT group had higher gain in MFAC, MRMI, BBS, and MBI than the control group. In addition, there were significant between-group differences in MFAC, MRMI, and BBS gains (<em>p</em> = 0.026, <em>p</em> = 0.010, and <em>p</em> = 0.042, respectively). There was no significant between-group difference (<em>p</em> = 0.597) in MBI gain (<em>p</em> = 0.597).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results suggested that RAGT can provide stroke patients extra benefits in terms of ambulation, mobility, and balance. However, in the aspect of basic activities of daily living, the effect of RAGT on stroke patients is similar to that of traditional physiotherapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"36 ","pages":"Pages 10-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.09.001","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S101370251630046X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) in improving functional outcomes among stroke patients.

Design

This was a retrospective matched control study.

Setting

This study was conducted in an extended inpatient rehabilitation centre.

Patients and intervention

There were 14 patients with subacute stroke (4–31 days after stroke) in the RAGT group. Apart from traditional physiotherapy, the RAGT group received RAGT. The number of sessions for RAGT ranged from five to 33, and the frequency was three to five sessions per week, with each session lasting for 15–30 minutes. In the control group, there were 27 subacute stroke patients who were matched with the RAGT group in terms of age, days since stroke, premorbid ambulatory level, functional outcomes at admission, length of training, and number of physiotherapy sessions received. The control group received traditional physiotherapy but not RAGT.

Outcome measures

Modified Functional Ambulation Category (MFAC), Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (MRMI), Berg's Balance Scale (BBS), and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) to measure ambulation, mobility, balance, and activities of daily living, respectively.

Results

Both RAGT and control groups had significant within-group improvement in MFAC, MRMI, BBS, and MBI. However, the RAGT group had higher gain in MFAC, MRMI, BBS, and MBI than the control group. In addition, there were significant between-group differences in MFAC, MRMI, and BBS gains (p = 0.026, p = 0.010, and p = 0.042, respectively). There was no significant between-group difference (p = 0.597) in MBI gain (p = 0.597).

Conclusion

The results suggested that RAGT can provide stroke patients extra benefits in terms of ambulation, mobility, and balance. However, in the aspect of basic activities of daily living, the effect of RAGT on stroke patients is similar to that of traditional physiotherapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机器人辅助步态训练在中风康复中的有效性:一项回顾性匹配对照研究
目的本研究旨在评估机器人辅助步态训练(RAGT)在改善脑卒中患者功能预后方面的有效性。这是一项回顾性匹配对照研究。本研究在一个扩展的住院康复中心进行。患者与干预RAGT组有14例亚急性脑卒中患者(脑卒中后4-31天)。在传统物理治疗的基础上,RAGT组给予RAGT治疗。RAGT的次数从5到33次不等,频率为每周3到5次,每次持续15-30分钟。在对照组中,有27例亚急性卒中患者在年龄、卒中后天数、发病前活动水平、入院时功能结局、训练时间和接受物理治疗次数方面与RAGT组相匹配。对照组采用传统物理治疗,不采用RAGT治疗。结果测量:改良功能行走类别(MFAC)、改良Rivermead活动指数(MRMI)、Berg平衡量表(BBS)和改良Barthel指数(MBI)分别测量行走、活动、平衡和日常生活活动。结果RAGT组和对照组在MFAC、MRMI、BBS和MBI方面均有组内显著改善。然而,RAGT组在MFAC、MRMI、BBS和MBI方面的增益高于对照组。此外,MFAC、MRMI和BBS增益组间差异显著(p = 0.026、p = 0.010和p = 0.042)。MBI增加(p = 0.597)组间无显著差异(p = 0.597)。结论RAGT对脑卒中患者在行走、活动和平衡方面有额外的益处。然而,在日常生活的基本活动方面,RAGT对脑卒中患者的作用与传统物理治疗相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is the official journal of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited (HKPA Ltd). This peer-reviewed journal aims to contribute to and document the advancements in the principles and practice of physiotherapy in Hong Kong.The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is published annually and papers are categorized into research reports, treatment reports, technical reports, literature reviews, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信