Parent-clinician agreement in rating the presence and severity of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms.

Ellen Nobel, J Agnes Brunnekreef, Russell J Schachar, Barbara J van den Hoofdakker, Pieter J Hoekstra
{"title":"Parent-clinician agreement in rating the presence and severity of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms.","authors":"Ellen Nobel,&nbsp;J Agnes Brunnekreef,&nbsp;Russell J Schachar,&nbsp;Barbara J van den Hoofdakker,&nbsp;Pieter J Hoekstra","doi":"10.1007/s12402-018-0267-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We determined the validity of a parent-report questionnaire as a research tool for rating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in children. Using Cohen's kappa and Pearson correlation, we examined the agreement between parent reports of ADHD symptoms (using the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham Questionnaire-IV; SNAP-IV) and clinical judgment (using a semi-structured parent interview). Also, we explored factors that may be associated with the level of agreement, using regression analyses. We found moderate levels of agreement for severity of overall ADHD (r = 0.43) and for hyperactive-impulsive symptoms (r = 0.54), but no significant agreement for inattentive symptoms. On individual symptom level (range kappa = - 0.05-0.22) and for the presence/absence of ADHD (kappa = 0.14), agreement was poor. Therefore, we conclude that parent-report questionnaires may be acceptable to rate the overall severity of ADHD symptoms in treatment effect studies, but not to detect the presence of ADHD in epidemiological studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":88387,"journal":{"name":"Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders","volume":"11 1","pages":"21-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12402-018-0267-8","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-018-0267-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

We determined the validity of a parent-report questionnaire as a research tool for rating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in children. Using Cohen's kappa and Pearson correlation, we examined the agreement between parent reports of ADHD symptoms (using the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham Questionnaire-IV; SNAP-IV) and clinical judgment (using a semi-structured parent interview). Also, we explored factors that may be associated with the level of agreement, using regression analyses. We found moderate levels of agreement for severity of overall ADHD (r = 0.43) and for hyperactive-impulsive symptoms (r = 0.54), but no significant agreement for inattentive symptoms. On individual symptom level (range kappa = - 0.05-0.22) and for the presence/absence of ADHD (kappa = 0.14), agreement was poor. Therefore, we conclude that parent-report questionnaires may be acceptable to rate the overall severity of ADHD symptoms in treatment effect studies, but not to detect the presence of ADHD in epidemiological studies.

父母-临床医生在评定注意力缺陷/多动障碍症状的存在和严重程度上的一致性。
我们确定了父母报告问卷作为评估儿童注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)症状的研究工具的有效性。使用Cohen’s kappa和Pearson相关性,我们检查了父母报告ADHD症状之间的一致性(使用Swanson, Nolan和Pelham问卷- iv;SNAP-IV)和临床判断(使用半结构化的家长访谈)。此外,我们使用回归分析探讨了可能与一致性水平相关的因素。我们发现总体ADHD的严重程度(r = 0.43)和多动冲动症状(r = 0.54)有中等程度的一致性,但注意力不集中症状没有显著一致性。在个体症状水平(kappa = - 0.05-0.22)和存在/不存在ADHD (kappa = 0.14)上,一致性很差。因此,我们的结论是,在治疗效果研究中,父母报告问卷可能可以评估ADHD症状的总体严重程度,但在流行病学研究中不能检测ADHD的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信