Evaluating the environmental impacts of formic acid production from CO2: catalytic hydrogenation vs. electrocatalytic reduction†

IF 9.3 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Green Chemistry Pub Date : 2021-10-11 DOI:10.1039/D1GC02997E
Dongseong Kang, Jaewon Byun and Jeehoon Han
{"title":"Evaluating the environmental impacts of formic acid production from CO2: catalytic hydrogenation vs. electrocatalytic reduction†","authors":"Dongseong Kang, Jaewon Byun and Jeehoon Han","doi":"10.1039/D1GC02997E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technology provides a promising approach for minimizing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and fossil resource depletion. Formic acid (FA) is a valuable chemical that can be produced using various CCU technologies; so it is necessary to explore the environmental impacts of potential FA production technologies. This study quantified the two major environmental impacts (climate change and fossil depletion) for two CCU strategies (catalytic and electrocatalytic CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>-based FA production) and compared them with the conventional strategy. Life cycle assessments were conducted for the integrated conversion and separation processes carried out in the Yeosu Industrial Complex in the Republic of Korea based on the literature data and simulation study. The results showed that the CCU strategies could reduce GHG emissions by 97%–132% (1.43–1.95 kg of CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> eq. per kg of pure FA) and save 69%–94% (0.56–0.78 kg oil eq. per kg of pure FA) of fossil resources compared with the conventional strategy. The major environmental drivers were identified for all strategies, and it was clear that the utility input was a major contributor to the environmental burden in all strategies. Scenarios in which the utility source and raw material supply were varied were analyzed to determine how to effectively reduce the environmental impact of CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>-based FA production. Finally, several implications were proposed for the development of an environmentally feasible electrocatalytic CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>-based FA production strategy: (1) improving the energy efficiency in reaction and separation and (2) introducing renewable electricity sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":78,"journal":{"name":"Green Chemistry","volume":" 23","pages":" 9470-9478"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/gc/d1gc02997e","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technology provides a promising approach for minimizing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and fossil resource depletion. Formic acid (FA) is a valuable chemical that can be produced using various CCU technologies; so it is necessary to explore the environmental impacts of potential FA production technologies. This study quantified the two major environmental impacts (climate change and fossil depletion) for two CCU strategies (catalytic and electrocatalytic CO2-based FA production) and compared them with the conventional strategy. Life cycle assessments were conducted for the integrated conversion and separation processes carried out in the Yeosu Industrial Complex in the Republic of Korea based on the literature data and simulation study. The results showed that the CCU strategies could reduce GHG emissions by 97%–132% (1.43–1.95 kg of CO2 eq. per kg of pure FA) and save 69%–94% (0.56–0.78 kg oil eq. per kg of pure FA) of fossil resources compared with the conventional strategy. The major environmental drivers were identified for all strategies, and it was clear that the utility input was a major contributor to the environmental burden in all strategies. Scenarios in which the utility source and raw material supply were varied were analyzed to determine how to effectively reduce the environmental impact of CO2-based FA production. Finally, several implications were proposed for the development of an environmentally feasible electrocatalytic CO2-based FA production strategy: (1) improving the energy efficiency in reaction and separation and (2) introducing renewable electricity sources.

Abstract Image

评价CO2制甲酸的环境影响:催化加氢与电催化还原†
碳捕获与利用(CCU)技术为减少温室气体(GHG)排放和减少化石资源消耗提供了一条有前途的途径。甲酸(FA)是一种有价值的化学品,可以通过各种CCU技术生产;因此,有必要探讨潜在的FA生产技术对环境的影响。本研究量化了两种CCU策略(催化和电催化基于co2的FA生产)的两种主要环境影响(气候变化和化石消耗),并将其与传统策略进行了比较。基于文献数据和模拟研究,对韩国丽水工业园区进行的综合转化和分离过程进行了生命周期评估。结果表明,与传统策略相比,CCU策略可减少97% ~ 132%的温室气体排放(每公斤纯FA减少1.43 ~ 1.95 kg CO2当量),节省69% ~ 94%的化石资源(每公斤纯FA减少0.56 ~ 0.78 kg石油当量)。确定了所有战略的主要环境驱动因素,很明显,公用事业投入是所有战略中环境负担的主要因素。分析了不同用途来源和原料供应的情景,以确定如何有效地减少基于二氧化碳的FA生产对环境的影响。最后,提出了开发环境可行的基于二氧化碳的电催化FA生产策略的几点启示:(1)提高反应和分离的能源效率;(2)引入可再生电力资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
677
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Green Chemistry is a journal that provides a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative green and sustainable technologies. The scope of Green Chemistry is based on the definition proposed by Anastas and Warner (Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, P T Anastas and J C Warner, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998), which defines green chemistry as the utilisation of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture and application of chemical products. Green Chemistry aims to reduce the environmental impact of the chemical enterprise by developing a technology base that is inherently non-toxic to living things and the environment. The journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of research relating to this endeavor and publishes original and significant cutting-edge research that is likely to be of wide general appeal. For a work to be published, it must present a significant advance in green chemistry, including a comparison with existing methods and a demonstration of advantages over those methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信