Effects of simulated visual acuity and ocular motility impairments on SSVEP brain-computer interface performance: An experiment with Shuffle Speller.

IF 1.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Brain-Computer Interfaces Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-08-23 DOI:10.1080/2326263X.2018.1504662
Betts Peters, Matt Higger, Fernando Quivira, Steven Bedrick, Shiran Dudy, Brandon Eddy, Michelle Kinsella, Tab Memmott, Jack Wiedrick, Melanie Fried-Oken, Deniz Erdogmus, Barry Oken
{"title":"Effects of simulated visual acuity and ocular motility impairments on SSVEP brain-computer interface performance: An experiment with Shuffle Speller.","authors":"Betts Peters,&nbsp;Matt Higger,&nbsp;Fernando Quivira,&nbsp;Steven Bedrick,&nbsp;Shiran Dudy,&nbsp;Brandon Eddy,&nbsp;Michelle Kinsella,&nbsp;Tab Memmott,&nbsp;Jack Wiedrick,&nbsp;Melanie Fried-Oken,&nbsp;Deniz Erdogmus,&nbsp;Barry Oken","doi":"10.1080/2326263X.2018.1504662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals with severe speech and physical impairments may have concomitant visual acuity impairments (VAI) or ocular motility impairments (OMI) impacting visual BCI use. We report on the use of the Shuffle Speller typing interface for an SSVEP BCI copy-spelling task under three conditions: simulated VAI, simulated OMI, and unimpaired vision. To mitigate the effect of visual impairments, we introduce a method that adaptively selects a user-specific trial length to maximize expected information transfer rate (ITR); expected ITR is shown to closely approximate the rate of correct letter selections. All participants could type under the unimpaired and simulated VAI conditions, with no significant differences in typing accuracy or speed. Most participants (31 of 37) could not type under the simulated OMI condition; some achieved high accuracy but with slower typing speeds. Reported workload and discomfort were low, and satisfaction high, under the unimpaired and simulated VAI conditions. Implications and future directions to examine effect of visual impairment on BCI use is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":45112,"journal":{"name":"Brain-Computer Interfaces","volume":"5 2-3","pages":"58-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2326263X.2018.1504662","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain-Computer Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2018.1504662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Individuals with severe speech and physical impairments may have concomitant visual acuity impairments (VAI) or ocular motility impairments (OMI) impacting visual BCI use. We report on the use of the Shuffle Speller typing interface for an SSVEP BCI copy-spelling task under three conditions: simulated VAI, simulated OMI, and unimpaired vision. To mitigate the effect of visual impairments, we introduce a method that adaptively selects a user-specific trial length to maximize expected information transfer rate (ITR); expected ITR is shown to closely approximate the rate of correct letter selections. All participants could type under the unimpaired and simulated VAI conditions, with no significant differences in typing accuracy or speed. Most participants (31 of 37) could not type under the simulated OMI condition; some achieved high accuracy but with slower typing speeds. Reported workload and discomfort were low, and satisfaction high, under the unimpaired and simulated VAI conditions. Implications and future directions to examine effect of visual impairment on BCI use is discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

模拟视力和眼动障碍对SSVEP脑机接口性能的影响:Shuffle拼写实验。
患有严重语言和身体障碍的个体可能同时患有影响视觉脑机接口使用的视力障碍(VAI)或眼运动障碍(OMI)。我们报告在三种条件下使用Shuffle Speller输入接口执行SSVEP BCI复制拼写任务:模拟VAI、模拟OMI和视力未受损。为了减轻视觉障碍的影响,我们引入了一种自适应选择用户特定的试用长度以最大化期望信息传输速率(ITR)的方法;预期的ITR显示出与正确字母选择率非常接近。所有参与者都可以在未受损和模拟VAI条件下打字,打字准确性和速度没有显着差异。大多数参与者(37人中有31人)在模拟OMI条件下不能打字;有些取得了很高的准确性,但打字速度较慢。在未受损和模拟VAI条件下,报告的工作量和不适较低,满意度较高。讨论了视障对脑机接口使用影响的意义和未来研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信