Statistical Analysis on Threshold of Haemoglobin A1C (HBA1c) for Diabetes Diagnosis and the Relationship Between HBA1c and Plasma Glucose Concentrations in Chinese Diabetic High-Risk Groups.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Xiaojun Li, Chundan Bao, Yashuang Zhao, Haiyan Song, Wei Wang
{"title":"Statistical Analysis on Threshold of Haemoglobin A1C (HBA1c) for Diabetes Diagnosis and the Relationship Between HBA1c and Plasma Glucose Concentrations in Chinese Diabetic High-Risk Groups.","authors":"Xiaojun Li,&nbsp;Chundan Bao,&nbsp;Yashuang Zhao,&nbsp;Haiyan Song,&nbsp;Wei Wang","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The goal is to evaluate the threshold of hemoglobin A1C (HBA1c) for screening test among Chinese patients with diabetes and high-risk groups in the endocrinological department and identify the relationship between HbA1c and plasma glucose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Experimental design: This study is based on the data selected from patients without clinical intervention enrolled in the Endocrinology Department and Admission Office in our hospital. It uses the four-point plasma glucose modeling and trapezoidal integration method to analyze the relationship between HbA1c and each plasma glucose threshold in an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Harbin, China, from January 1st of 2010 to December 31st of 2012.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>2,853 16 - 85 year-old patients who came to our Endocrinology Department to take venous blood measurements and OGTT.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>The OGTT and HbA1c were performed simultaneously, unless acidosis was present, without considering past history of diabetes and oral hypoglycemic drugs or insulin treatment, or other basic combined diseases. Pregnant patients were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) was 0.902 (95% confidence interval 0.890 to 0.914) for HbA1c alone and 0.915 (0.906 to 0.925) for fasting plasma glucose (FPG) alone. The HbA1c threshold of 6.5% showed the highest Youden index of 64.4%, and significantly higher sensitivity (81.1%, 79.3% to 82.7%) than FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L (69.8%, 67.8% to 71.8%) (p < 0.0001) and higher specificity (83.3%, 80.4% to 85.8%) than HbA1c ≥ 6.3% (76.3%, 73.2% to 79.3%) (p < 0.0001) in detecting diabetes, together with a low negative likelihood ratio of 0.2. In addition, the threshold of 1/2 hour postprandial glucose and that of 1 hour postprandial glucose are 10.6 mmol/L and 13.6 mmol/L, respectively. Thus, the relative contribution of FPG increased gradually with increasing levels of HbA1c: 15.9% in the lowest vs. 44.0% in the highest quintile (p < 0.001). The relative contribution of 1-hour postprandial glucose decreased progressively from the lowest (25.0%) to the highest quintile of HbA1c (14.2%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the optimal HbA1c threshold of 6.5% as a screening criterion for diabetes and high-risk groups may be acceptable. This paper is trying to put forward the thresholds of 1/2-hour plasma glucose and 1-hour plasma glucose for diagnosing diabetes. The relative contribution of FPG increased gradually with increasing levels of HbA1c; however, the contribution of postprandial glucose decreased progressively.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180711","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The goal is to evaluate the threshold of hemoglobin A1C (HBA1c) for screening test among Chinese patients with diabetes and high-risk groups in the endocrinological department and identify the relationship between HbA1c and plasma glucose.

Methods: Experimental design: This study is based on the data selected from patients without clinical intervention enrolled in the Endocrinology Department and Admission Office in our hospital. It uses the four-point plasma glucose modeling and trapezoidal integration method to analyze the relationship between HbA1c and each plasma glucose threshold in an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

Setting: Harbin, China, from January 1st of 2010 to December 31st of 2012.

Participants: 2,853 16 - 85 year-old patients who came to our Endocrinology Department to take venous blood measurements and OGTT.

Selection criteria: The OGTT and HbA1c were performed simultaneously, unless acidosis was present, without considering past history of diabetes and oral hypoglycemic drugs or insulin treatment, or other basic combined diseases. Pregnant patients were excluded.

Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) was 0.902 (95% confidence interval 0.890 to 0.914) for HbA1c alone and 0.915 (0.906 to 0.925) for fasting plasma glucose (FPG) alone. The HbA1c threshold of 6.5% showed the highest Youden index of 64.4%, and significantly higher sensitivity (81.1%, 79.3% to 82.7%) than FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L (69.8%, 67.8% to 71.8%) (p < 0.0001) and higher specificity (83.3%, 80.4% to 85.8%) than HbA1c ≥ 6.3% (76.3%, 73.2% to 79.3%) (p < 0.0001) in detecting diabetes, together with a low negative likelihood ratio of 0.2. In addition, the threshold of 1/2 hour postprandial glucose and that of 1 hour postprandial glucose are 10.6 mmol/L and 13.6 mmol/L, respectively. Thus, the relative contribution of FPG increased gradually with increasing levels of HbA1c: 15.9% in the lowest vs. 44.0% in the highest quintile (p < 0.001). The relative contribution of 1-hour postprandial glucose decreased progressively from the lowest (25.0%) to the highest quintile of HbA1c (14.2%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that the optimal HbA1c threshold of 6.5% as a screening criterion for diabetes and high-risk groups may be acceptable. This paper is trying to put forward the thresholds of 1/2-hour plasma glucose and 1-hour plasma glucose for diagnosing diabetes. The relative contribution of FPG increased gradually with increasing levels of HbA1c; however, the contribution of postprandial glucose decreased progressively.

中国糖尿病高危人群糖化血红蛋白(HBA1c)诊断糖尿病阈值及与血糖关系的统计分析
背景:目的是评估中国糖尿病患者和内分泌科高危人群筛查试验中血红蛋白A1C (HBA1c)的阈值,并确定HBA1c与血糖的关系。方法:实验设计:本研究选取我院内分泌科及住院办公室无临床干预的患者为研究对象。采用四点血糖模型和梯形积分法分析口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)中HbA1c与各血糖阈值的关系。时间设定:2010年1月1日至2012年12月31日,中国哈尔滨。参与者:2,853例16 - 85岁到内分泌科进行静脉血测量和OGTT的患者。选择标准:OGTT和HbA1c同时进行,除非存在酸中毒,不考虑既往糖尿病和口服降糖药或胰岛素治疗史,或其他基础联合疾病。排除孕妇。结果:单独HbA1c组受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC)为0.902(95%可信区间0.890 ~ 0.914),单独空腹血糖(FPG)组受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC)为0.915(0.906 ~ 0.925)。HbA1c阈值为6.5%时约登指数最高,为64.4%,检测糖尿病的敏感性(81.1%,79.3% ~ 82.7%)显著高于FPG≥7.0 mmol/L (69.8%, 67.8% ~ 71.8%) (p < 0.0001),特异性(83.3%,80.4% ~ 85.8%)显著高于HbA1c≥6.3% (76.3%,73.2% ~ 79.3%)(p < 0.0001),低阴性似然比为0.2。另外,1/2小时餐后血糖阈值为10.6 mmol/L, 1小时餐后血糖阈值为13.6 mmol/L。因此,FPG的相对贡献随着HbA1c水平的升高而逐渐增加:最低五分位数为15.9%,最高五分位数为44.0% (p < 0.001)。餐后1小时血糖对HbA1c的相对贡献从最低(25.0%)逐渐下降到最高(14.2%,p < 0.001)。结论:这些发现表明,将6.5%的最佳HbA1c阈值作为糖尿病和高危人群的筛查标准是可以接受的。本文试图提出1/2小时血糖和1小时血糖诊断糖尿病的阈值。随着HbA1c水平的升高,FPG的相对贡献逐渐增大;然而,餐后葡萄糖的贡献逐渐降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书