Risk factors, characteristics, and outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome in dogs and cats: 54 cases.

Ludivine Boiron, Kate Hopper, Angela Borchers
{"title":"Risk factors, characteristics, and outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome in dogs and cats: 54 cases.","authors":"Ludivine Boiron,&nbsp;Kate Hopper,&nbsp;Angela Borchers","doi":"10.1111/vec.12819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize the clinical features of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), risk factors, and outcome in dogs and cats. The study also aimed to evaluate the current veterinary criteria for the diagnosis of ARDS by comparison of clinical diagnostic criteria with necropsy findings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Fifty-four client-owned animals, 46 dogs and 8 cats.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Medical records were reviewed for patients with the diagnosis of ARDS based on previously published clinical criteria or necropsy diagnosis. Signalment, clinical findings, and outcome were recorded.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Animals were grouped according to a clinical or necropsy diagnosis: 43/54 (80%) were diagnosed with ARDS based on clinical criteria (group 1) and 11/54 (20%) were diagnosed with ARDS based on necropsy only (group 2). In group 1, 22/43 (51%) had a necropsy, which confirmed ARDS in 12/22 (54%). Direct (pulmonary) causes of ARDS were more common than indirect causes in dogs, while cats had a similar occurrence of direct and indirect causes. The most common risk factors identified in dogs were aspiration pneumonia (42%), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (29%), and shock (29%). All cats diagnosed clinically with ARDS had SIRS with or without sepsis. Of the animals with a clinical diagnosis of ARDS, 49% received mechanical ventilation and 58% received treatment (with or without mechanical ventilation) for 24 hours or longer. The overall case fatality rate was 84% in dogs and 100% in cats.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical relevance: </strong>As described in human literature, pneumonia was the most common risk factor in dogs with ARDS, whereas it was SIRS for the cat population. The high mortality rate and discrepancy between the clinical diagnosis and necropsy findings may highlight limitations in the clinical criteria for the diagnosis of ARDS and treatment in dogs and cats.</p>","PeriodicalId":74015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/vec.12819","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.12819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Objective: To characterize the clinical features of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), risk factors, and outcome in dogs and cats. The study also aimed to evaluate the current veterinary criteria for the diagnosis of ARDS by comparison of clinical diagnostic criteria with necropsy findings.

Design: Retrospective study.

Animals: Fifty-four client-owned animals, 46 dogs and 8 cats.

Interventions: Medical records were reviewed for patients with the diagnosis of ARDS based on previously published clinical criteria or necropsy diagnosis. Signalment, clinical findings, and outcome were recorded.

Measurements and main results: Animals were grouped according to a clinical or necropsy diagnosis: 43/54 (80%) were diagnosed with ARDS based on clinical criteria (group 1) and 11/54 (20%) were diagnosed with ARDS based on necropsy only (group 2). In group 1, 22/43 (51%) had a necropsy, which confirmed ARDS in 12/22 (54%). Direct (pulmonary) causes of ARDS were more common than indirect causes in dogs, while cats had a similar occurrence of direct and indirect causes. The most common risk factors identified in dogs were aspiration pneumonia (42%), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (29%), and shock (29%). All cats diagnosed clinically with ARDS had SIRS with or without sepsis. Of the animals with a clinical diagnosis of ARDS, 49% received mechanical ventilation and 58% received treatment (with or without mechanical ventilation) for 24 hours or longer. The overall case fatality rate was 84% in dogs and 100% in cats.

Conclusions and clinical relevance: As described in human literature, pneumonia was the most common risk factor in dogs with ARDS, whereas it was SIRS for the cat population. The high mortality rate and discrepancy between the clinical diagnosis and necropsy findings may highlight limitations in the clinical criteria for the diagnosis of ARDS and treatment in dogs and cats.

54例犬猫急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素、特征和结局
目的:探讨犬猫急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的临床特点、危险因素及预后。本研究还旨在通过临床诊断标准与尸检结果的比较,评价目前兽医诊断ARDS的标准。设计:回顾性研究。动物:54只客户拥有的动物,46只狗和8只猫。干预措施:根据先前公布的临床标准或尸检诊断,回顾了诊断为ARDS的患者的医疗记录。记录信号、临床表现和结果。测量结果和主要结果:动物根据临床或尸检诊断分组:43/54(80%)根据临床标准诊断为ARDS(第1组),11/54(20%)仅根据尸检诊断为ARDS(第2组)。第1组22/43(51%)进行尸检,其中12/22(54%)确诊为ARDS。狗的直接(肺)原因比间接原因更常见,而猫的直接和间接原因发生率相似。犬类中最常见的危险因素是吸入性肺炎(42%)、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)(29%)和休克(29%)。所有临床诊断为ARDS的猫都有伴有或不伴有败血症的SIRS。在临床诊断为ARDS的动物中,49%接受了机械通气,58%接受了24小时或更长时间的治疗(有或没有机械通气)。狗和猫的总病死率分别为84%和100%。结论和临床意义:正如人类文献所述,肺炎是狗患ARDS最常见的危险因素,而猫则是SIRS。高死亡率和临床诊断与尸检结果之间的差异可能突出了狗和猫ARDS诊断和治疗的临床标准的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信