Daily sedentary time and physical activity as assessed by accelerometry and their correlates in older adults.

IF 3.5
Adriana J van Ballegooijen, Hidde P van der Ploeg, Marjolein Visser
{"title":"Daily sedentary time and physical activity as assessed by accelerometry and their correlates in older adults.","authors":"Adriana J van Ballegooijen,&nbsp;Hidde P van der Ploeg,&nbsp;Marjolein Visser","doi":"10.1186/s11556-019-0210-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Higher physical activity is associated with lower chronic disease risk among older adults. However, less is known about the optimal balance between daily physical activity and sedentary time and their correlates among older adults. We described objectively measured physical activity patterns using 7 day hip-accelerometry and assessed its correlates in a large cross-sectional sample of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam, a population-based cohort of older Dutch adults. In addition, we examined different combined profiles of sedentary time and physical activity across strata of sex, age, education and BMI groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 71 (SD 8) years and 51% (<i>n</i> = 615) were women. The majority of wear time was spent sedentary (65%) followed by light (33%), and MVPA (2%). Higher age and higher BMI were related to more time spent sedentary, while female sex and lower education were related lower sedentary time. The combination of high sedentary time (≥65.4% of waking time) and low physical activity (< 9.1% of waking time) was significantly associated with higher age, higher BMI, and slower walking speed compared to the combination of low sedentary time and high physical activity <i>P</i> < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dutch older adults spend on average 65% of their waking time sedentary. Older adults' sedentary time differs by age, sex, education and BMI groups. The combination of high sedentary time and low physical was associated with higher age, higher BMI, and slower walking speed compared to the combination of low sedentary time and high MVPA. This suggests that increasing light activity might be an effective and feasible strategy in older persons to reduce sedentary time. Future studies should assess whether low- sedentary and high-light physical activity are associated with improved long-term health outcomes (also independent of MVPA).</p>","PeriodicalId":520622,"journal":{"name":"European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity","volume":" ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s11556-019-0210-9","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-019-0210-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Background: Higher physical activity is associated with lower chronic disease risk among older adults. However, less is known about the optimal balance between daily physical activity and sedentary time and their correlates among older adults. We described objectively measured physical activity patterns using 7 day hip-accelerometry and assessed its correlates in a large cross-sectional sample of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam, a population-based cohort of older Dutch adults. In addition, we examined different combined profiles of sedentary time and physical activity across strata of sex, age, education and BMI groups.

Results: Mean age was 71 (SD 8) years and 51% (n = 615) were women. The majority of wear time was spent sedentary (65%) followed by light (33%), and MVPA (2%). Higher age and higher BMI were related to more time spent sedentary, while female sex and lower education were related lower sedentary time. The combination of high sedentary time (≥65.4% of waking time) and low physical activity (< 9.1% of waking time) was significantly associated with higher age, higher BMI, and slower walking speed compared to the combination of low sedentary time and high physical activity P < 0.001.

Conclusions: Dutch older adults spend on average 65% of their waking time sedentary. Older adults' sedentary time differs by age, sex, education and BMI groups. The combination of high sedentary time and low physical was associated with higher age, higher BMI, and slower walking speed compared to the combination of low sedentary time and high MVPA. This suggests that increasing light activity might be an effective and feasible strategy in older persons to reduce sedentary time. Future studies should assess whether low- sedentary and high-light physical activity are associated with improved long-term health outcomes (also independent of MVPA).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

老年人每日久坐时间和身体活动的加速度测定及其相关性
背景:在老年人中,较高的体力活动与较低的慢性疾病风险相关。然而,对于老年人日常体力活动和久坐时间之间的最佳平衡及其相关性,人们所知甚少。我们使用7天髋关节加速测量法客观地描述了身体活动模式,并在阿姆斯特丹纵向衰老研究(一个以荷兰老年人为基础的队列)的大型横断面样本中评估了其相关性。此外,我们还研究了不同性别、年龄、教育程度和BMI组的久坐时间和体育活动的不同组合。结果:平均年龄71岁(SD 8),女性占51% (n = 615)。大部分佩戴时间是久坐(65%),其次是光(33%)和MVPA(2%)。年龄越大、身体质量指数越高,久坐时间越长,而女性和受教育程度越低,久坐时间越短。久坐时间长(≥清醒时间的65.4%)和体力活动少(P)的组合。结论:荷兰老年人平均有65%的清醒时间是久坐的。老年人的久坐时间因年龄、性别、教育程度和身体质量指数不同而不同。与低久坐时间和高MVPA的组合相比,高久坐时间和低体力的组合与更高的年龄、更高的BMI和更慢的步行速度相关。这表明,增加轻度活动可能是老年人减少久坐时间的有效和可行的策略。未来的研究应该评估低久坐和高强度的身体活动是否与改善的长期健康结果相关(也独立于MVPA)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书