Survey of Treatment Preferences for Opioid Use Disorder.

Jacobs journal of addiction and therapy Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-11-27
Ravi Nahata, Michael J Mancino, Jeff Thostenson, Alison H Oliveto
{"title":"Survey of Treatment Preferences for Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Ravi Nahata,&nbsp;Michael J Mancino,&nbsp;Jeff Thostenson,&nbsp;Alison H Oliveto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study gathered preliminary information on the initial feasibility of using injection Naltrexone (NTX) therapy in opioid users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred opioid users (36% female, 8% minorities, mean age 34.5±11.4 yrs.) undergoing a health screen to determine initial eligibility for an ongoing study completed the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 respondents, 26, 16, 16, 1 and 0 reported prior treatment episodes of opioid detoxification, buprenorphine (BUP), methadone (MTD), oral NTX and injection NTX, respectively. Ninety and 71% were interested in participating in a study involving oral and/or injection NTX treatment, respectively. Reasons for not wanting to try injection NTX included fear of needles (n=13), side effects (n=7), lack of pain relief (n=12) and cost (n=3). A significantly higher percentage of those interested in injection NTX had episodes of prior opioid agonist maintenance treatment relative to those uninterested (32.4% vs 10.3%; Chi<sup>2</sup>=5.2, p<0.03). Those preferring injection NTX therapy showed a higher level of interest in this therapy (3.08±1.01 vs 1.62±1.35; Rank Sum p<0.0001) and a lower degree of interest in BUP treatment (2.96±0.93 vs 3.38±0.90; Rank Sum p< 0.03) than those not preferring injection NTX.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These preliminary results suggest that those with prior, failed experience with opioid agonist maintenance treatment are more likely to consider injection NTX therapy, suggesting it may be optimal as a second-line treatment for OUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":92660,"journal":{"name":"Jacobs journal of addiction and therapy","volume":"5 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530927/pdf/nihms-1012988.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jacobs journal of addiction and therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study gathered preliminary information on the initial feasibility of using injection Naltrexone (NTX) therapy in opioid users.

Methods: One hundred opioid users (36% female, 8% minorities, mean age 34.5±11.4 yrs.) undergoing a health screen to determine initial eligibility for an ongoing study completed the survey.

Results: Of the 100 respondents, 26, 16, 16, 1 and 0 reported prior treatment episodes of opioid detoxification, buprenorphine (BUP), methadone (MTD), oral NTX and injection NTX, respectively. Ninety and 71% were interested in participating in a study involving oral and/or injection NTX treatment, respectively. Reasons for not wanting to try injection NTX included fear of needles (n=13), side effects (n=7), lack of pain relief (n=12) and cost (n=3). A significantly higher percentage of those interested in injection NTX had episodes of prior opioid agonist maintenance treatment relative to those uninterested (32.4% vs 10.3%; Chi2=5.2, p<0.03). Those preferring injection NTX therapy showed a higher level of interest in this therapy (3.08±1.01 vs 1.62±1.35; Rank Sum p<0.0001) and a lower degree of interest in BUP treatment (2.96±0.93 vs 3.38±0.90; Rank Sum p< 0.03) than those not preferring injection NTX.

Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that those with prior, failed experience with opioid agonist maintenance treatment are more likely to consider injection NTX therapy, suggesting it may be optimal as a second-line treatment for OUD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

阿片类药物使用障碍的治疗偏好调查。
目的:本研究收集了使用注射纳曲酮(NTX)治疗阿片类药物使用者的初步可行性的初步信息。方法:100名阿片类药物使用者(36%为女性,8%为少数民族,平均年龄34.5±11.4岁)接受了健康筛查,以确定是否有资格参加正在进行的研究。结果:在100名应答者中,分别有26人、16人、16人、1人和0人报告了阿片类药物戒毒、丁丙诺啡(BUP)、美沙酮(MTD)、口服NTX和注射NTX的治疗经历。分别有90%和71%的人有兴趣参加涉及口服和/或注射NTX治疗的研究。不想尝试注射NTX的原因包括害怕针头(n=13)、副作用(n=7)、缺乏疼痛缓解(n=12)和费用(n=3)。与不感兴趣的患者相比,对注射NTX感兴趣的患者先前接受过阿片类激动剂维持治疗的比例明显更高(32.4% vs 10.3%;结论:这些初步结果表明,那些先前接受阿片类激动剂维持治疗失败的患者更有可能考虑注射NTX治疗,这表明它可能是OUD的最佳二线治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信