The effect of lercanidipine or lercanidipine/enalapril combination on blood pressure in treatment-naïve patients with stage 1 or 2 systolic hypertension.

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Pragmatic and Observational Research Pub Date : 2019-01-22 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2147/POR.S186070
Brian Rayner
{"title":"The effect of lercanidipine or lercanidipine/enalapril combination on blood pressure in treatment-naïve patients with stage 1 or 2 systolic hypertension.","authors":"Brian Rayner","doi":"10.2147/POR.S186070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the efficacy of a stratified approach on automatic office blood pressure (BP), 24-hour ambulatory BP, and BP variability (BPV) in treatment-naïve patients with systolic hypertension using lercanidipine for stage 1 and lercanidipine/enalapril for stage 2.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was an open-label, prospective interventional study conducted in 22 general practices in South Africa. Treatment-naïve patients with stage 1 hypertension received lercanidipine 10 mg and patients with stage 2 received lercanidipine 10 mg/enalapril 10 mg. After 6 weeks, patients not reaching target (<140/90 mmHg) were up-titrated to lercanidipine 10 mg/enalapril 10 mg or lercanidipine 10 mg/enalapril 20 mg, respectively, for a further 6 weeks. Office BP was determined at each visit, and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitor (ABPM) at baseline and 12 weeks. The primary end point was changes in office BP, and secondary end points were changes in 24-hour ABPM and BPV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 198 patients, 48% had stage 1 and 52% stage 2 hypertension. The mean age was 55 years, body mass index was 29.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 48.5% were female, and 15.1% were diabetic. The mean (SD) office SBP and DBP at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks was 158.2 (13.8), 141.6 (11.1), and 138.7 (16.7) mmHg (<i>P</i><0.00001), and 92.2 (10.6), 84.6 (11.1), and 82 (13.3) mmHg (<i>P</i><0.00001), respectively. The mean (SD) systolic and diastolic daytime ABPM at baseline and 12 weeks was 157 (16.63) and 142 (14.41) mmHg (<i>P</i><0.0001) and 88 (12.34) and 81 (10.79) mmHg (<i>P</i><0.0001), and the nighttime ABPM was 146 (15.68) and 133 (13.94) mmHg (<i>P</i><0.0001) and 79.5 (11.64) and 72.5 (10.05) mmHg (<i>P</i><0.009), respectively. There were few adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lercanidipine and lercanidipine/enalapril for stage 1 or 2 hypertension highly improves office SBP and DBP, overall 24-hour BP, daytime BP, and nighttime BP, also reducing BPV with few adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"9-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/POR.S186070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S186070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the efficacy of a stratified approach on automatic office blood pressure (BP), 24-hour ambulatory BP, and BP variability (BPV) in treatment-naïve patients with systolic hypertension using lercanidipine for stage 1 and lercanidipine/enalapril for stage 2.

Patients and methods: This was an open-label, prospective interventional study conducted in 22 general practices in South Africa. Treatment-naïve patients with stage 1 hypertension received lercanidipine 10 mg and patients with stage 2 received lercanidipine 10 mg/enalapril 10 mg. After 6 weeks, patients not reaching target (<140/90 mmHg) were up-titrated to lercanidipine 10 mg/enalapril 10 mg or lercanidipine 10 mg/enalapril 20 mg, respectively, for a further 6 weeks. Office BP was determined at each visit, and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitor (ABPM) at baseline and 12 weeks. The primary end point was changes in office BP, and secondary end points were changes in 24-hour ABPM and BPV.

Results: Of the 198 patients, 48% had stage 1 and 52% stage 2 hypertension. The mean age was 55 years, body mass index was 29.2 kg/m2, 48.5% were female, and 15.1% were diabetic. The mean (SD) office SBP and DBP at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks was 158.2 (13.8), 141.6 (11.1), and 138.7 (16.7) mmHg (P<0.00001), and 92.2 (10.6), 84.6 (11.1), and 82 (13.3) mmHg (P<0.00001), respectively. The mean (SD) systolic and diastolic daytime ABPM at baseline and 12 weeks was 157 (16.63) and 142 (14.41) mmHg (P<0.0001) and 88 (12.34) and 81 (10.79) mmHg (P<0.0001), and the nighttime ABPM was 146 (15.68) and 133 (13.94) mmHg (P<0.0001) and 79.5 (11.64) and 72.5 (10.05) mmHg (P<0.009), respectively. There were few adverse events.

Conclusion: Lercanidipine and lercanidipine/enalapril for stage 1 or 2 hypertension highly improves office SBP and DBP, overall 24-hour BP, daytime BP, and nighttime BP, also reducing BPV with few adverse effects.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

来卡尼地平或来卡尼地平/依那普利联合用药对treatment-naïve期1或2期收缩期高血压患者血压的影响
目的:描述分层方法对收缩期高血压treatment-naïve患者的自动办公室血压(BP)、24小时动态血压和血压变异性(BPV)的疗效,这些患者使用莱卡尼地平治疗1期,使用莱卡尼地平/依那普利治疗2期。患者和方法:这是一项开放标签的前瞻性介入研究,在南非的22家全科医院进行。Treatment-naïve 1期高血压患者接受来卡尼地平10mg, 2期患者接受来卡尼地平10mg /依那普利10mg。结果:198例患者中,1期高血压占48%,2期高血压占52%。平均年龄55岁,体重指数29.2 kg/m2,女性48.5%,糖尿病患者15.1%。基线、6周和12周时办公室收缩压和舒张压的平均值(SD)分别为158.2(13.8)、141.6(11.1)和138.7 (16.7)mmHg (ppppppp)。结论:来卡尼地平和来卡尼地平/依那普利治疗1期或2期高血压可显著改善办公室收缩压和舒张压、总24小时血压、白天血压和夜间血压,同时降低BPV,副作用少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pragmatic and Observational Research
Pragmatic and Observational Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Pragmatic and Observational Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes data from studies designed to closely reflect medical interventions in real-world clinical practice, providing insights beyond classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While RCTs maximize internal validity for cause-and-effect relationships, they often represent only specific patient groups. This journal aims to complement such studies by providing data that better mirrors real-world patients and the usage of medicines, thus informing guidelines and enhancing the applicability of research findings across diverse patient populations encountered in everyday clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信