[Pets (dogs/cats) as a possible source of opportunistic pathogenic fungi in humans].

Abstract

Introduction: The microbiological aspect of a relationship between pets (dogs/cats) and their owners is mainly concerned with the incidence of the shared fungal species that can be potential pathogens. Since sharing homes with pets is very popular in the Czech Republic, there is an increased possibility of communication between microbiota of the two macroorganisms (the pet and the owner). The aim of the study was to determine, based on the close relationship between pets and humans, the biodiversity of shared fungi, also with respect to previous antimicrobial therapy.

Methods: A total of 103 samples were collected from 20 pairs (20 owners, 16 dogs and 4 cats). All owners completed a questionnaire with their pets' veterinarians. In owners, swabs were collected from the nasal mucosa, armpit and interdigital spaces of the foot. In pets, swabs were obtained from the external auditory meatus and nasal mucosa. In individuals with skin lesions, samples were also collected from the affected areas. Fungal species were identified by culture and microscopy methods and confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization - time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. Statistical methods were used to correlate the closeness of relationship with the number of shared fungal species and to correlate previous antimicrobial therapy with the number of shared species of microscopic fungi.

Results: Analysis of the questionnaire found that 65 % of owners who participated in the study kept more pets at home than only the tested one. In the previous year, 5 % of pets and 5 % of owners received antimicrobial therapy. As many as 45 % of dogs or cats slept in their owners' beds and 80 % rested on a sofa together with their owners. Also, 45 % of owners had their faces licked by pets. Eighty percent of pets were fed with several types of food (dry food and cooked food). Further, 70 % of pets lived permanently with their owners in the same household. A total of 45 microscopic fungi species were isolated, of which 15 species occurred in both macroorganisms (pets and humans). Thirty-two species were identified from human and 28 species from animal samples. The most frequent species was the yeast Candida albicans, isolated from 30 samples. From the human nasal mucosa, only four species were isolated. The richest biodiversity was observed in interdigital space samples (26 fungal species). Once again, the most frequent fungal species was C. albicans (8 cases). The most numerous animal samples were obtained from the external auditory meatus. There, the most frequent species was Malassezia pachydermatis (17 cases). In seven pairs, microscopic fungi were shared. Of those, two pairs shared two spe-cies and five pairs shared one species. A total of five fungal species were shared, most often the yeasts C. albicans and Geotrichum candidum.

Conclusion: The closeness of the human-pet relationship apparently does not influence the number of shared fungal species. The yeast Candida albicans was most frequently isolated from owners as well as from the nasal mucosa in pets. The lipophilic yeast M. pachydermatis most commonly occurred in the material from the external auditory meatus and skin scales from dogs and cats.