Low-fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation with contact force and ultrasound technologies: a learning curve.

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Pragmatic and Observational Research Pub Date : 2019-01-10 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2147/POR.S181220
Paul C Zei, Tina D Hunter, Larry M Gache, Gerri O'Riordan, Tina Baykaner, Chad R Brodt
{"title":"Low-fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation with contact force and ultrasound technologies: a learning curve.","authors":"Paul C Zei,&nbsp;Tina D Hunter,&nbsp;Larry M Gache,&nbsp;Gerri O'Riordan,&nbsp;Tina Baykaner,&nbsp;Chad R Brodt","doi":"10.2147/POR.S181220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Fluoroscopy exposure during catheter ablation is a health hazard to patients and operators. This study presents the results of implementing a low-fluoroscopy workflow using modern contact force (CF) technologies in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation. Methods A fluoroscopy reduction workflow was implemented and subsequent catheter ablations for PAF were evaluated. After vascular access with ultrasound guidance, a THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH® Catheter (ST) was advanced into the right atrium. The decapolar catheter was placed without fluoroscopy. A double-transseptal puncture was performed under intracardiac echocardiography guidance. ST and mapping catheters were advanced into the left atrium. A left atrial map was created, and pulmonary vein (PV) isolation was confirmed via entrance and exit block before and after the administration of isoproterenol or adenosine. Results Forty-three patients underwent PAF ablation with fluoroscopy reduction workflow (mean age: 66±9 years; 70% male), performed by five operators. Acute success rate (PV isolation) was 96.5% of PVs. One case of pericardial effusion, not requiring intervention, was the only acute complication. Mean procedure time was 217±42 minutes. Mean fluoroscopy time was 2.3±3.0 minutes, with 97.7% of patients having < 10 minutes and 86.0% having < 5 minutes. A significant downward trend over time was observed, suggesting a rapid learning curve for fluoroscopy reduction. Freedom from any atrial arrhythmias without reablation was 80.0% after a mean follow-up of 12±3 months. Conclusion Low fluoroscopy time is achievable with CF technologies after a short learning curve, without compromising patient safety or effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/POR.S181220","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S181220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background Fluoroscopy exposure during catheter ablation is a health hazard to patients and operators. This study presents the results of implementing a low-fluoroscopy workflow using modern contact force (CF) technologies in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation. Methods A fluoroscopy reduction workflow was implemented and subsequent catheter ablations for PAF were evaluated. After vascular access with ultrasound guidance, a THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH® Catheter (ST) was advanced into the right atrium. The decapolar catheter was placed without fluoroscopy. A double-transseptal puncture was performed under intracardiac echocardiography guidance. ST and mapping catheters were advanced into the left atrium. A left atrial map was created, and pulmonary vein (PV) isolation was confirmed via entrance and exit block before and after the administration of isoproterenol or adenosine. Results Forty-three patients underwent PAF ablation with fluoroscopy reduction workflow (mean age: 66±9 years; 70% male), performed by five operators. Acute success rate (PV isolation) was 96.5% of PVs. One case of pericardial effusion, not requiring intervention, was the only acute complication. Mean procedure time was 217±42 minutes. Mean fluoroscopy time was 2.3±3.0 minutes, with 97.7% of patients having < 10 minutes and 86.0% having < 5 minutes. A significant downward trend over time was observed, suggesting a rapid learning curve for fluoroscopy reduction. Freedom from any atrial arrhythmias without reablation was 80.0% after a mean follow-up of 12±3 months. Conclusion Low fluoroscopy time is achievable with CF technologies after a short learning curve, without compromising patient safety or effectiveness.

Abstract Image

低透视心房颤动消融与接触力和超声技术:一个学习曲线。
背景:导管消融过程中的透视暴露对患者和手术者都是一种健康危害。本研究介绍了在阵发性心房颤动(PAF)消融中使用现代接触力(CF)技术实现低透视工作流程的结果。方法:实施透视复位工作流程,并对PAF的后续导管消融进行评估。在超声引导下进入血管后,将THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH®导管(ST)推进至右心房。在没有透视的情况下放置脱斜导管。在超声心动图引导下行双隔穿刺。ST和定位导管进入左心房。在异丙肾上腺素或腺苷给药前后,绘制左心房图,通过进出阻断确认肺静脉(PV)隔离。结果:43例患者行PAF消融加透视复位流程(平均年龄66±9岁;70%为男性),由5名操作人员执行。急性成功率(PV分离)为96.5%。1例心包积液是唯一的急性并发症,无需干预。平均手术时间217±42分钟。平均透视时间为2.3±3.0分钟,97.7%的患者< 10分钟,86.0%的患者< 5分钟。随着时间的推移,观察到明显的下降趋势,表明透视复位的快速学习曲线。平均随访12±3个月,无房性心律失常复发率为80.0%。结论:CF技术在短时间学习曲线后可以实现低透视时间,而不会影响患者的安全性或有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pragmatic and Observational Research
Pragmatic and Observational Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Pragmatic and Observational Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes data from studies designed to closely reflect medical interventions in real-world clinical practice, providing insights beyond classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While RCTs maximize internal validity for cause-and-effect relationships, they often represent only specific patient groups. This journal aims to complement such studies by providing data that better mirrors real-world patients and the usage of medicines, thus informing guidelines and enhancing the applicability of research findings across diverse patient populations encountered in everyday clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信