Volker Hessel , Nam Nghiep Tran , Mahdieh Razi Asrami , Quy Don Tran , Nguyen Van Duc Long , Marc Escribà-Gelonch , Jose Osorio Tejada , Steffen Linke , Kai Sundmacher
{"title":"Sustainability of green solvents – review and perspective","authors":"Volker Hessel , Nam Nghiep Tran , Mahdieh Razi Asrami , Quy Don Tran , Nguyen Van Duc Long , Marc Escribà-Gelonch , Jose Osorio Tejada , Steffen Linke , Kai Sundmacher","doi":"10.1039/d1gc03662a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Solvents define pivotal properties for chemical processing and chemical reactions, and can be as game-changing as catalysts. A solvent can be the key to a good chemical process, rather than being just an asset and a reaction space. It determines the solubility, meaning the concentration at which reactants can be processed, determines the stability of excited states, and thus guides the potential-energy curves of activation. As a net outcome, solvents rule over productivity and economic/environmental benefit. Expanding the capabilities of conventional solvents, a new class of so-called master solvents has been proposed and investigated in the last two decades, which have also been termed “green” or “designer” solvents. They comprise first of all ionic liquids and supercritical carbon dioxide, yet also deep eutectic, thermomorphic and fluorous solvents. There is a vast literature on and experience with these solvents and their applications. However, their sustainability has been reported mostly by considering only one class of master solvent and hardly benchmarking several classes. Thus, a comparative, complete, and holistic view of their sustainability is missing. This perspective review aims to fill this gap and focuses on a holistic overview of sustainability assessments of master solvents. It encompasses green chemistry principles, life cycle assessments, and modern circularity evaluations based on the “10R framework”; standing for 10 principles starting with “R” such as recycling, reuse, repair, rethink, remanufacture, and so on. This review will show what “green” actually denotes and means for each class of master solvent when it comes to a ‘weighting’ by a certified sustainability assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":78,"journal":{"name":"Green Chemistry","volume":"24 2","pages":"Pages 410-437"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1463926222000851","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41
Abstract
Solvents define pivotal properties for chemical processing and chemical reactions, and can be as game-changing as catalysts. A solvent can be the key to a good chemical process, rather than being just an asset and a reaction space. It determines the solubility, meaning the concentration at which reactants can be processed, determines the stability of excited states, and thus guides the potential-energy curves of activation. As a net outcome, solvents rule over productivity and economic/environmental benefit. Expanding the capabilities of conventional solvents, a new class of so-called master solvents has been proposed and investigated in the last two decades, which have also been termed “green” or “designer” solvents. They comprise first of all ionic liquids and supercritical carbon dioxide, yet also deep eutectic, thermomorphic and fluorous solvents. There is a vast literature on and experience with these solvents and their applications. However, their sustainability has been reported mostly by considering only one class of master solvent and hardly benchmarking several classes. Thus, a comparative, complete, and holistic view of their sustainability is missing. This perspective review aims to fill this gap and focuses on a holistic overview of sustainability assessments of master solvents. It encompasses green chemistry principles, life cycle assessments, and modern circularity evaluations based on the “10R framework”; standing for 10 principles starting with “R” such as recycling, reuse, repair, rethink, remanufacture, and so on. This review will show what “green” actually denotes and means for each class of master solvent when it comes to a ‘weighting’ by a certified sustainability assessment.
期刊介绍:
Green Chemistry is a journal that provides a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative green and sustainable technologies. The scope of Green Chemistry is based on the definition proposed by Anastas and Warner (Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, P T Anastas and J C Warner, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998), which defines green chemistry as the utilisation of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture and application of chemical products. Green Chemistry aims to reduce the environmental impact of the chemical enterprise by developing a technology base that is inherently non-toxic to living things and the environment. The journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of research relating to this endeavor and publishes original and significant cutting-edge research that is likely to be of wide general appeal. For a work to be published, it must present a significant advance in green chemistry, including a comparison with existing methods and a demonstration of advantages over those methods.