Patient positioning during minimally invasive surgery: what is current best practice?

Robotic surgery (Auckland) Pub Date : 2017-07-14 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RSRR.S115239
Jacqueline M Zillioux, Tracey L Krupski
{"title":"Patient positioning during minimally invasive surgery: what is current best practice?","authors":"Jacqueline M Zillioux,&nbsp;Tracey L Krupski","doi":"10.2147/RSRR.S115239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Positioning injuries are a known surgical complication and can result in significant patient morbidity. Studies have shown a small but significant number of neurovascular injuries associated with minimally invasive surgery, due to both patient and case-specific factors. We sought to review the available literature in regards to pathophysiological and practical recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted and categorized by level of evidence, with emphasis on prospective studies. The result comprised 14 studies, which were summarized and analyzed with respect to our study objectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While incidence of positioning injury has been identified in up to one-third of prospective populations, its true prevalence after surgery is likely 2%-5%. The mechanism is thought to be intraneural disruption from stretching or pressure, which results in decreased perfusion. On a larger scale, this vascular compromise can lead to ischemia and rhabdomyolysis. Prevention hinges on addressing patient modifiable factors such as body mass index, judicious positioning with appropriate devices, and intraoperative team awareness consisting of recurrent extremity checks and time management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk for positioning injuries is underappreciated. Surgeons who perform minimally invasive surgery should discuss the potential for these complications with their patients, and operative teams should take steps to minimize risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":92137,"journal":{"name":"Robotic surgery (Auckland)","volume":"4 ","pages":"69-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/RSRR.S115239","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Robotic surgery (Auckland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RSRR.S115239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Introduction: Positioning injuries are a known surgical complication and can result in significant patient morbidity. Studies have shown a small but significant number of neurovascular injuries associated with minimally invasive surgery, due to both patient and case-specific factors. We sought to review the available literature in regards to pathophysiological and practical recommendations.

Methods: A literature search was conducted and categorized by level of evidence, with emphasis on prospective studies. The result comprised 14 studies, which were summarized and analyzed with respect to our study objectives.

Results: While incidence of positioning injury has been identified in up to one-third of prospective populations, its true prevalence after surgery is likely 2%-5%. The mechanism is thought to be intraneural disruption from stretching or pressure, which results in decreased perfusion. On a larger scale, this vascular compromise can lead to ischemia and rhabdomyolysis. Prevention hinges on addressing patient modifiable factors such as body mass index, judicious positioning with appropriate devices, and intraoperative team awareness consisting of recurrent extremity checks and time management.

Conclusion: The risk for positioning injuries is underappreciated. Surgeons who perform minimally invasive surgery should discuss the potential for these complications with their patients, and operative teams should take steps to minimize risk factors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

微创手术中患者体位:目前的最佳做法是什么?
定位损伤是一种已知的手术并发症,可导致显著的患者发病率。研究表明,由于患者和病例特异性因素,与微创手术相关的神经血管损伤数量虽少,但数量显著。我们试图回顾有关病理生理和实用建议的现有文献。方法:进行文献检索,并按证据水平分类,重点是前瞻性研究。结果包括14项研究,根据我们的研究目标对其进行总结和分析。结果:虽然定位损伤的发生率已确定在多达三分之一的预期人群中,但其在手术后的真实患病率可能为2%-5%。其机制被认为是由拉伸或压力引起的神经内破坏,从而导致灌注减少。在更大的范围内,这种血管损伤可导致缺血和横纹肌溶解。预防取决于解决患者可改变的因素,如体重指数,使用适当器械的明智定位,以及术中团队意识,包括复发性肢体检查和时间管理。结论:体位损伤的危险性未被充分认识。进行微创手术的外科医生应与患者讨论这些并发症的可能性,手术团队应采取措施将危险因素降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书