Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: current status.

Robotic surgery (Auckland) Pub Date : 2017-01-23 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RSRR.S102743
Sara E Arian, Jessian L Munoz, Suejin Kim, Tommaso Falcone
{"title":"Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: current status.","authors":"Sara E Arian,&nbsp;Jessian L Munoz,&nbsp;Suejin Kim,&nbsp;Tommaso Falcone","doi":"10.2147/RSRR.S102743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic-assisted surgery has seen a rapid development and integration in the field of gynecology. Since the approval of the use of robot for gynecological surgery and considering its several advantages over conventional laparoscopy, it has been widely incorporated especially in the field of reproductive surgery. Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumors of the female reproductive tract. Many reproductive-aged women with this condition demand uterine-sparing surgery to preserve their fertility. Myomectomy, the surgical excision of uterine fibroids, remains the only surgical management option for fibroids that entails preservation of fertility. In this review, we focus on the role of robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy and its current status, in comparison with other alternative approaches for myomectomy, including open, hysteroscopic, and traditional laparoscopic techniques. Several different surgical techniques have been demonstrated for robotic myomectomy. This review endeavors to share and describe our surgical experience of using the standard laparoscopic equipment for robotic-assisted myomectomy, together with the da Vinci Robot system. For the ideal surgical candidate, robotic-assisted myomectomy is a safe minimally invasive surgical procedure that can be offered as an alternative to open surgery. The advantages of using the robot system compared to open myomectomy include a shorter length of hospital stay, less postoperative pain and analgesic use, faster return to normal activities, more rapid return of the bowel function, and enhanced cosmetic results due to smaller skin incision sizes. Some of the disadvantages of this technique include high costs of the robotic surgical system and equipment, the steep learning curve of this novel system, and prolonged operative and anesthesia times. Robotic technology is a novel and innovative minimally invasive approach with demonstrated feasibility in gynecological and reproductive surgery. This technology is expected to take the lead in gynecological surgery in the upcoming decade.</p>","PeriodicalId":92137,"journal":{"name":"Robotic surgery (Auckland)","volume":"4 ","pages":"7-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/RSRR.S102743","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Robotic surgery (Auckland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RSRR.S102743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery has seen a rapid development and integration in the field of gynecology. Since the approval of the use of robot for gynecological surgery and considering its several advantages over conventional laparoscopy, it has been widely incorporated especially in the field of reproductive surgery. Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumors of the female reproductive tract. Many reproductive-aged women with this condition demand uterine-sparing surgery to preserve their fertility. Myomectomy, the surgical excision of uterine fibroids, remains the only surgical management option for fibroids that entails preservation of fertility. In this review, we focus on the role of robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy and its current status, in comparison with other alternative approaches for myomectomy, including open, hysteroscopic, and traditional laparoscopic techniques. Several different surgical techniques have been demonstrated for robotic myomectomy. This review endeavors to share and describe our surgical experience of using the standard laparoscopic equipment for robotic-assisted myomectomy, together with the da Vinci Robot system. For the ideal surgical candidate, robotic-assisted myomectomy is a safe minimally invasive surgical procedure that can be offered as an alternative to open surgery. The advantages of using the robot system compared to open myomectomy include a shorter length of hospital stay, less postoperative pain and analgesic use, faster return to normal activities, more rapid return of the bowel function, and enhanced cosmetic results due to smaller skin incision sizes. Some of the disadvantages of this technique include high costs of the robotic surgical system and equipment, the steep learning curve of this novel system, and prolonged operative and anesthesia times. Robotic technology is a novel and innovative minimally invasive approach with demonstrated feasibility in gynecological and reproductive surgery. This technology is expected to take the lead in gynecological surgery in the upcoming decade.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术:现状。
机器人辅助手术在妇科领域得到了迅速的发展和融合。由于机器人在妇科手术中的应用被批准,并且考虑到其相对于传统腹腔镜手术的诸多优点,机器人已被广泛应用于妇科手术,特别是生殖外科手术领域。子宫肌瘤是女性生殖道最常见的良性肿瘤。许多患有这种疾病的育龄妇女需要保留子宫的手术来保持她们的生育能力。子宫肌瘤切除术,手术切除子宫肌瘤,仍然是唯一的手术管理选择肌瘤需要保留生育能力。在这篇综述中,我们将重点介绍机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的作用及其现状,并与其他子宫肌瘤切除术的替代方法进行比较,包括开放、宫腔镜和传统腹腔镜技术。几种不同的手术技术已经证明了机器人子宫肌瘤切除术。这篇综述试图分享和描述我们使用标准腹腔镜设备进行机器人辅助子宫肌瘤切除术的手术经验,以及达芬奇机器人系统。对于理想的手术候选人,机器人辅助子宫肌瘤切除术是一种安全的微创外科手术,可以作为开放手术的替代方案。与开放式子宫肌瘤切除术相比,使用机器人系统的优点包括住院时间更短,术后疼痛和止痛药使用更少,恢复正常活动更快,肠道功能恢复更快,由于皮肤切口尺寸更小,美容效果更好。这种技术的一些缺点包括机器人手术系统和设备的高成本,这种新系统的陡峭学习曲线,以及延长手术和麻醉时间。机器人技术是一种新颖、创新的微创技术,在妇科和生殖外科手术中具有可行性。这项技术有望在未来十年引领妇科手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书