Effectiveness of Subconjunctival 0.5% Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia after Intravitreal Silicon Oil Removal Surgery.

Q2 Medicine
Pain Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2018-12-24 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/8501519
Aida Rosita Tantri, Riyadh Firdaus, Elvioza, Immaculata Astrid Budiman
{"title":"Effectiveness of Subconjunctival 0.5% Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia after Intravitreal Silicon Oil Removal Surgery.","authors":"Aida Rosita Tantri,&nbsp;Riyadh Firdaus,&nbsp;Elvioza,&nbsp;Immaculata Astrid Budiman","doi":"10.1155/2018/8501519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravitreal silicon oil removal surgery can cause mild-to-moderate postoperative pain and discomfort in most patients. Postoperative pain can be managed by using many methods, including a local anesthetic drug. One of the common local anesthetic drugs is 0.5% bupivacaine. The application techniques also vary, such as subconjunctival application. It was a good alternative for postoperative analgesia in the ophthalmic surgery because of its minimal risks and complications. The purpose of this research was to measure the effectiveness of subconjunctival 0.5% bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in silicon oil removal surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a double-blind randomized clinical study in patients undergoing elective intravitreal silicon oil removal surgery at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. Thirty consecutive patients, enrolled from October 2016 to February 2017, were randomized to receive subconjunctival 0.5% bupivacaine or subconjunctival placebo (0.9% NaCl) at the end of the surgery. The primary outcome was the pain score 24 hours after surgery, using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Intravenous injection of tramadol 50 mg was given if the VAS >4. Secondary outcomes were the time to first analgesic requirement and the incidence of nausea/vomiting. Statistical analysis was conducted to measure the difference between 24 h pain score in the bupivacaine group (B) and that in the placebo group (NS).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The overall 24 hours' postoperative pain score was significantly different between the bupivacaine group and the placebo group (<i>p</i>=0.001). In the 24 hours after surgery, there were only five patients needing additional analgesia in the placebo group. The time to first analgesic requirement was significantly different between the two groups (<i>p</i>=0.042). Nausea/vomiting only happened in the placebo group with proportions 6% and 3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Subconjunctival 0.5% bupivacaine was effective for postoperative analgesia in intravitreal silicon oil removal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19786,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research and Treatment","volume":"2018 ","pages":"8501519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/8501519","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8501519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Intravitreal silicon oil removal surgery can cause mild-to-moderate postoperative pain and discomfort in most patients. Postoperative pain can be managed by using many methods, including a local anesthetic drug. One of the common local anesthetic drugs is 0.5% bupivacaine. The application techniques also vary, such as subconjunctival application. It was a good alternative for postoperative analgesia in the ophthalmic surgery because of its minimal risks and complications. The purpose of this research was to measure the effectiveness of subconjunctival 0.5% bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in silicon oil removal surgery.

Method: This was a double-blind randomized clinical study in patients undergoing elective intravitreal silicon oil removal surgery at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. Thirty consecutive patients, enrolled from October 2016 to February 2017, were randomized to receive subconjunctival 0.5% bupivacaine or subconjunctival placebo (0.9% NaCl) at the end of the surgery. The primary outcome was the pain score 24 hours after surgery, using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Intravenous injection of tramadol 50 mg was given if the VAS >4. Secondary outcomes were the time to first analgesic requirement and the incidence of nausea/vomiting. Statistical analysis was conducted to measure the difference between 24 h pain score in the bupivacaine group (B) and that in the placebo group (NS).

Result: The overall 24 hours' postoperative pain score was significantly different between the bupivacaine group and the placebo group (p=0.001). In the 24 hours after surgery, there were only five patients needing additional analgesia in the placebo group. The time to first analgesic requirement was significantly different between the two groups (p=0.042). Nausea/vomiting only happened in the placebo group with proportions 6% and 3%, respectively.

Conclusion: Subconjunctival 0.5% bupivacaine was effective for postoperative analgesia in intravitreal silicon oil removal surgery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

结膜下0.5%布比卡因用于玻璃体内硅油去除术后镇痛的效果。
背景:玻璃体内硅油去除手术可引起大多数患者术后轻度至中度疼痛和不适。术后疼痛可以通过许多方法来控制,包括局部麻醉药物。常见的局麻药之一是0.5%布比卡因。应用技术也各不相同,如结膜下应用。由于其风险小,并发症少,是眼科手术术后镇痛的一种很好的替代方法。本研究的目的是测量0.5%布比卡因结膜下用于硅油去除手术术后镇痛的有效性。方法:这是一项双盲随机临床研究,在Cipto Mangunkusumo医院接受择期玻璃体内硅油去除手术的患者。从2016年10月至2017年2月,连续30例患者被随机分组,在手术结束时接受0.5%布比卡因结膜下或0.9% NaCl的结膜下安慰剂治疗。主要观察指标为术后24小时疼痛评分,采用100 mm视觉模拟评分(VAS)。如VAS >4,给予曲马多50mg静脉注射。次要结局是到第一次需要镇痛药的时间和恶心/呕吐的发生率。统计学分析布比卡因组(B)与安慰剂组(NS) 24 h疼痛评分的差异。结果:布比卡因组与安慰剂组术后24小时总体疼痛评分差异有统计学意义(p=0.001)。在术后24小时内,安慰剂组只有5例患者需要额外的镇痛。两组患者第一次需要镇痛的时间差异有统计学意义(p=0.042)。恶心/呕吐仅在安慰剂组发生,比例分别为6%和3%。结论:0.5%布比卡因结膜下用于玻璃体内硅油去除术的术后镇痛是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Research and Treatment
Pain Research and Treatment Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信