Caregivers' Experience of Decision-Making regarding Diagnostic Assessment following Cognitive Screening of Older Adults.

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Aging Research Pub Date : 2018-12-02 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/8352816
Jamie J Y Lee, Joanna Barlas, Claire L Thompson, Yan Hong Dong
{"title":"Caregivers' Experience of Decision-Making regarding Diagnostic Assessment following Cognitive Screening of Older Adults.","authors":"Jamie J Y Lee,&nbsp;Joanna Barlas,&nbsp;Claire L Thompson,&nbsp;Yan Hong Dong","doi":"10.1155/2018/8352816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Targeted screening for dementia among older adults in primary healthcare has potential benefits such as better clinical outcomes and the opportunity to access services. Cognitive screening can be followed up by further diagnostic assessment to determine a diagnosis of dementia. Unfortunately, the rates of accepting further diagnostic assessment following cognitive screening are low. The objective of this study was to explore the caregivers' decision-making process regarding uptake of diagnostic assessment following positive screening results. A qualitative design was employed, and interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to analyze the data. Three major themes in caregiver decision-making were identified: gathering information, protecting the patient, and balancing obligation and convenience in caregiving. These findings suggest that the decision-making process involved effort to process information through observations of the patient and that caregivers emphasized quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":14933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Research","volume":"2018 ","pages":"8352816"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/8352816","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8352816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Targeted screening for dementia among older adults in primary healthcare has potential benefits such as better clinical outcomes and the opportunity to access services. Cognitive screening can be followed up by further diagnostic assessment to determine a diagnosis of dementia. Unfortunately, the rates of accepting further diagnostic assessment following cognitive screening are low. The objective of this study was to explore the caregivers' decision-making process regarding uptake of diagnostic assessment following positive screening results. A qualitative design was employed, and interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to analyze the data. Three major themes in caregiver decision-making were identified: gathering information, protecting the patient, and balancing obligation and convenience in caregiving. These findings suggest that the decision-making process involved effort to process information through observations of the patient and that caregivers emphasized quality of life.

老年人认知筛查后护理人员诊断评估决策的经验。
在初级卫生保健中对老年人进行有针对性的痴呆症筛查具有潜在的益处,例如更好的临床结果和获得服务的机会。认知筛查可以通过进一步的诊断评估来确定痴呆的诊断。不幸的是,接受认知筛查后进一步诊断评估的比率很低。本研究的目的是探讨在筛查结果呈阳性后,护理人员在接受诊断评估方面的决策过程。采用定性设计,解释现象学分析分析数据。确定了护理人员决策的三个主要主题:收集信息,保护患者,平衡护理的义务和便利。这些发现表明,决策过程涉及通过观察患者来处理信息的努力,护理人员强调生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Aging Research
Journal of Aging Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信