The predictive value of R-wave peak time on no-reflow in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with a primary percutaneous coronary intervention

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ahmed Bendary , Mohamed El-Husseiny , Tarek Aboul Azm , Ahmed Abdoul Moneim
{"title":"The predictive value of R-wave peak time on no-reflow in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with a primary percutaneous coronary intervention","authors":"Ahmed Bendary ,&nbsp;Mohamed El-Husseiny ,&nbsp;Tarek Aboul Azm ,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdoul Moneim","doi":"10.1016/j.ehj.2018.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Coronary no-reflow (NR) is a dreadful complication of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) that is seen in nearly 50% of cases. A great effort is being done to discover simple tools that could predict such a complication. We aimed primarily to study the predictive power of R-wave peak time (RWPT) on NR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From October 2017 to March 2018, we enrolled 123 patients with STEMI treated with pPCI at Benha University Hospital and National Heart Institute. We measured RWPT from infarct-related artery (IRA) leads and assessed the development of NR in all finally included 100 patients (after exclusions).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Based on occurrence of NR, patients were divided into 2 groups; Group I (n = 39) with NR and group II (n = 61) without NR. Smoking, DM, HTN, longer reperfusion times and higher thrombus burden were significantly associated with NR. Both pre- and postprocedural RWPT were significantly higher in group I than Group II. Preprocedural RWPT &gt; 46 ms predicted NR with a sensitivity and specificity of 79.5% and 86.9% respectively (AUC 0.891, 95% CI 0.82–0.962, P &lt; 0.001). In adjusted multivariate analysis, preprocedural RWPT was found to be among independent predictors for NR (OR: 26.2, 95% CI: 6.5–105.1, P &lt; 0.001). The predictive power of preprocedural RWPT was statistically non-inferior to ST-resolution (STR)% (difference between area under curves = 0.029, P = 0.595).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>RWPT is strongly associated with and significantly predicts the development of NR. This association was statistically non-inferior to the well-known association between STR% and NR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44962,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Heart Journal","volume":"70 4","pages":"Pages 415-419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehj.2018.07.006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110260818301170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Coronary no-reflow (NR) is a dreadful complication of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) that is seen in nearly 50% of cases. A great effort is being done to discover simple tools that could predict such a complication. We aimed primarily to study the predictive power of R-wave peak time (RWPT) on NR.

Methods

From October 2017 to March 2018, we enrolled 123 patients with STEMI treated with pPCI at Benha University Hospital and National Heart Institute. We measured RWPT from infarct-related artery (IRA) leads and assessed the development of NR in all finally included 100 patients (after exclusions).

Results

Based on occurrence of NR, patients were divided into 2 groups; Group I (n = 39) with NR and group II (n = 61) without NR. Smoking, DM, HTN, longer reperfusion times and higher thrombus burden were significantly associated with NR. Both pre- and postprocedural RWPT were significantly higher in group I than Group II. Preprocedural RWPT > 46 ms predicted NR with a sensitivity and specificity of 79.5% and 86.9% respectively (AUC 0.891, 95% CI 0.82–0.962, P < 0.001). In adjusted multivariate analysis, preprocedural RWPT was found to be among independent predictors for NR (OR: 26.2, 95% CI: 6.5–105.1, P < 0.001). The predictive power of preprocedural RWPT was statistically non-inferior to ST-resolution (STR)% (difference between area under curves = 0.029, P = 0.595).

Conclusion

RWPT is strongly associated with and significantly predicts the development of NR. This association was statistically non-inferior to the well-known association between STR% and NR.

Abstract Image

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗st段抬高型心肌梗死患者无血流再灌注时r波峰值时间的预测价值
背景:冠状动脉无回流(NR)是原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)的一种可怕的并发症,在近50%的病例中可以看到。人们正在努力寻找能够预测这种并发症的简单工具。我们的主要目的是研究r波峰值时间(RWPT)对心肌梗死的预测能力。方法2017年10月至2018年3月,我们在Benha大学医院和国家心脏研究所招募了123例经pPCI治疗的STEMI患者。我们测量了梗死相关动脉(IRA)导联的RWPT,并评估了所有最终纳入的100例患者(排除后)NR的发展。结果根据NR的发生情况将患者分为两组;有NR组(n = 39)和无NR组(n = 61)。吸烟、DM、HTN、再灌注时间较长、血栓负荷较高与NR有显著相关性,且术前和术后RWPT均显著高于II组。术前RWPT > 46 ms预测NR的敏感性和特异性分别为79.5%和86.9% (AUC 0.891, 95% CI 0.82-0.962, P < 0.001)。在调整后的多变量分析中,术前RWPT被发现是NR的独立预测因子之一(OR: 26.2, 95% CI: 6.5-105.1, P < 0.001)。术前RWPT的预测能力在统计学上不低于st分辨率(STR)%(曲线下面积 = 0.029,P = 0.595)。结论rwpt与NR的发生有显著相关性,与STR%与NR的相关性在统计学上不逊色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Egyptian Heart Journal
Egyptian Heart Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Egyptian Heart Journal is the official journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology. It is an international journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies and translational investigations. The journal publishes research, review articles, case reports and commentary articles, as well as editorials interpreting and commenting on the research presented. In addition, it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信