The Polar ® OH1 Optical Heart Rate Sensor is Valid during Moderate-Vigorous Exercise.

Sports medicine international open Pub Date : 2018-06-17 eCollection Date: 2018-06-01 DOI:10.1055/a-0631-0920
Matthew M Schubert, Amy Clark, Annie B De La Rosa
{"title":"The Polar <sup>®</sup> OH1 Optical Heart Rate Sensor is Valid during Moderate-Vigorous Exercise.","authors":"Matthew M Schubert,&nbsp;Amy Clark,&nbsp;Annie B De La Rosa","doi":"10.1055/a-0631-0920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Traditional heart-rate monitoring through the use of electrocardiograms or chest-worn heart rate sensors can be challenging in certain sports or in field settings. New technologies, such as photoplethysmography (PPG), have enabled heart-rate monitoring at alternate sites. However, to date, the accuracy and validity of various PPG sensors has not been examined in detail. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine the validity of an arm-worn PPG sensor during yoga sequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen college-aged men and women participated in a ~45 min power vinyasa yoga class. During the class, participants wore Polar <sup>®</sup> H7 chest straps and RCX3 receivers (criterion) and Polar <sup>®</sup> OH1 arm bands on their upper right arm (practical). Mean differences were compared via a paired <i>t</i> -test, heart rate during yoga using a time*device repeated measures ANOVA, and agreement assessed with Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean heart rates during yoga were not different (mean difference=0.76, 95% CI: -0.54 to 2.06; <i>p</i> =0.229). Yoga created a main effect of time on heart rate ( <i>p</i> <0.0001), but there was no difference between devices ( <i>p</i> =0.86) or interaction ( <i>p</i> =0.90). Mean bias±95% limits of agreement was 0.76±1.30 bpm, with a typical error of 2.42±1.49 bpm and a coefficient of variation of 1.8±1.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results of the present investigation revealed that the Polar <sup>®</sup> OH1 is a valid measure of heart rate during moderate-vigorous exercise. Future validation studies should consider other exercise modes and participant characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":"2 3","pages":"E67-E70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/a-0631-0920","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0631-0920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Purpose: Traditional heart-rate monitoring through the use of electrocardiograms or chest-worn heart rate sensors can be challenging in certain sports or in field settings. New technologies, such as photoplethysmography (PPG), have enabled heart-rate monitoring at alternate sites. However, to date, the accuracy and validity of various PPG sensors has not been examined in detail. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine the validity of an arm-worn PPG sensor during yoga sequences.

Methods: Fifteen college-aged men and women participated in a ~45 min power vinyasa yoga class. During the class, participants wore Polar ® H7 chest straps and RCX3 receivers (criterion) and Polar ® OH1 arm bands on their upper right arm (practical). Mean differences were compared via a paired t -test, heart rate during yoga using a time*device repeated measures ANOVA, and agreement assessed with Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: Mean heart rates during yoga were not different (mean difference=0.76, 95% CI: -0.54 to 2.06; p =0.229). Yoga created a main effect of time on heart rate ( p <0.0001), but there was no difference between devices ( p =0.86) or interaction ( p =0.90). Mean bias±95% limits of agreement was 0.76±1.30 bpm, with a typical error of 2.42±1.49 bpm and a coefficient of variation of 1.8±1.5%.

Conclusions: Results of the present investigation revealed that the Polar ® OH1 is a valid measure of heart rate during moderate-vigorous exercise. Future validation studies should consider other exercise modes and participant characteristics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Polar®OH1光学心率传感器适用于中度剧烈运动。
目的:在某些运动或野外环境中,通过使用心电图或胸前佩戴的心率传感器进行传统的心率监测可能具有挑战性。新技术,如光电容积脉搏波描记术(PPG),使在其他地点监测心率成为可能。然而,迄今为止,各种PPG传感器的准确性和有效性尚未得到详细的检验。本研究的目的是确定在瑜伽序列中手臂佩戴的PPG传感器的有效性。方法:15名大学生男女参加了45分钟的力量瑜伽课程。在课堂上,参与者佩戴Polar®H7胸带和RCX3接收器(标准),右上臂佩戴Polar®OH1臂带(实用)。通过配对t检验比较平均差异,使用时间*装置重复测量方差分析比较瑜伽期间的心率,并使用Bland-Altman分析评估一致性。结果:瑜伽期间的平均心率没有差异(平均差异=0.76,95% CI: -0.54至2.06;p = 0.229)。瑜伽创造了时间对心率(p =0.86)或互动(p =0.90)的主要影响。平均偏差±95%一致限为0.76±1.30 bpm,典型误差为2.42±1.49 bpm,变异系数为1.8±1.5%。结论:本研究的结果表明,Polar®OH1是一种有效的测量心率在中度剧烈运动。未来的验证研究应考虑其他运动模式和参与者特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信