Prisoners with Islamist Relations: Are Prisoner Files a Valuable Data Source for Individual Assessment and for Research?

Sonja King, Johann Endres, Mariann Schwaβ, Mark Stemmler, Lora Lauchs, Andreas Armborst
{"title":"Prisoners with Islamist Relations: Are Prisoner Files a Valuable Data Source for Individual Assessment and for Research?","authors":"Sonja King,&nbsp;Johann Endres,&nbsp;Mariann Schwaβ,&nbsp;Mark Stemmler,&nbsp;Lora Lauchs,&nbsp;Andreas Armborst","doi":"10.3233/DEV-170243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Violent extremism research is still lacking a sound empirical basis for the validation of assessment instruments. Yet there is a growing need for these instruments to assess the dangerousness of individuals, but also the success of interventions. By analysing prisoner files of one female and 39 male inmates (average age 28.83 years, <i>SD</i> = 7.58) with administratively assigned Islamism-related security labels in Bavarian prisons, we tried to clarify two questions: Firstly, is it possible to collect relevant data from prisoner files drawing on risk assessment procedures? Secondly, how do inmates associated with the Salafist scene (security label \"Salafist scene\") differ from those who are apparently involved with terror networks (security label \"terror\"), and do these differences predict the risk they pose? Our results suggest that files are a valuable, though not perfect data source for individual assessment and research. The two groups defined by the labels differ significantly in their biographies, mental health, and behaviour. Conclusions pertaining to biographical background factors, risk assessment, and management are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":513284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Developmental Science","volume":"12 1-2","pages":"129-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/DEV-170243","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-170243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Violent extremism research is still lacking a sound empirical basis for the validation of assessment instruments. Yet there is a growing need for these instruments to assess the dangerousness of individuals, but also the success of interventions. By analysing prisoner files of one female and 39 male inmates (average age 28.83 years, SD = 7.58) with administratively assigned Islamism-related security labels in Bavarian prisons, we tried to clarify two questions: Firstly, is it possible to collect relevant data from prisoner files drawing on risk assessment procedures? Secondly, how do inmates associated with the Salafist scene (security label "Salafist scene") differ from those who are apparently involved with terror networks (security label "terror"), and do these differences predict the risk they pose? Our results suggest that files are a valuable, though not perfect data source for individual assessment and research. The two groups defined by the labels differ significantly in their biographies, mental health, and behaviour. Conclusions pertaining to biographical background factors, risk assessment, and management are discussed.

有伊斯兰关系的囚犯:囚犯档案是个人评估和研究的宝贵数据源吗?
暴力极端主义研究仍然缺乏可靠的实证基础来验证评估工具。然而,越来越需要这些工具来评估个人的危险性,以及干预措施的成功与否。通过分析巴伐利亚州监狱中1名女性囚犯和39名男性囚犯(平均年龄28.83岁,SD = 7.58)的囚犯档案,我们试图澄清两个问题:首先,是否有可能利用风险评估程序从囚犯档案中收集相关数据?其次,与萨拉菲斯特现场有关的囚犯(安全标签为“萨拉菲斯特现场”)与那些明显与恐怖网络有关的囚犯(安全标签为“恐怖”)有何不同,这些差异是否能预测他们所构成的风险?我们的研究结果表明,档案是一个有价值的,虽然不是完美的数据来源的个人评估和研究。被标签定义的两组人在他们的经历、心理健康和行为上有很大的不同。结论有关的传记背景因素,风险评估和管理进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信