Prevalence and Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2012.

IF 37.3 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Deborah L Christensen, Kim Van Naarden Braun, Jon Baio, Deborah Bilder, Jane Charles, John N Constantino, Julie Daniels, Maureen S Durkin, Robert T Fitzgerald, Margaret Kurzius-Spencer, Li-Ching Lee, Sydney Pettygrove, Cordelia Robinson, Eldon Schulz, Chris Wells, Martha S Wingate, Walter Zahorodny, Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp
{"title":"Prevalence and Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2012.","authors":"Deborah L Christensen,&nbsp;Kim Van Naarden Braun,&nbsp;Jon Baio,&nbsp;Deborah Bilder,&nbsp;Jane Charles,&nbsp;John N Constantino,&nbsp;Julie Daniels,&nbsp;Maureen S Durkin,&nbsp;Robert T Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Margaret Kurzius-Spencer,&nbsp;Li-Ching Lee,&nbsp;Sydney Pettygrove,&nbsp;Cordelia Robinson,&nbsp;Eldon Schulz,&nbsp;Chris Wells,&nbsp;Martha S Wingate,&nbsp;Walter Zahorodny,&nbsp;Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.ss6513a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem/condition: </strong>Autism spectrum disorder (ASD).</p><p><strong>Period covered: </strong>2012.</p><p><strong>Description of system: </strong>The Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network is an active surveillance system that provides estimates of the prevalence and characteristics of ASD among children aged 8 years whose parents or guardians reside in 11 ADDM Network sites in the United States (Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah, and Wisconsin). Surveillance to determine ASD case status is conducted in two phases. The first phase consists of screening and abstracting comprehensive evaluations performed by professional service providers in the community. Data sources identified for record review are categorized as either 1) education source type, including developmental evaluations to determine eligibility for special education services or 2) health care source type, including diagnostic and developmental evaluations. The second phase involves the review of all abstracted evaluations by trained clinicians to determine ASD surveillance case status. A child meets the surveillance case definition for ASD if one or more comprehensive evaluations of that child completed by a qualified professional describes behaviors that are consistent with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision diagnostic criteria for any of the following conditions: autistic disorder, pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified (including atypical autism), or Asperger disorder. This report provides ASD prevalence estimates for children aged 8 years living in catchment areas of the ADDM Network sites in 2012, overall and stratified by sex, race/ethnicity, and the type of source records (education and health records versus health records only). In addition, this report describes the proportion of children with ASD with a score consistent with intellectual disability on a standardized intellectual ability test, the age at which the earliest known comprehensive evaluation was performed, the proportion of children with a previous ASD diagnosis, the specific type of ASD diagnosis, and any special education eligibility classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 2012, the combined estimated prevalence of ASD among the 11 ADDM Network sites was 14.5 per 1,000 (one in 69) children aged 8 years. Estimated prevalence was significantly higher among boys aged 8 years (23.4 per 1,000) than among girls aged 8 years (5.2 per 1,000). Estimated ASD prevalence was significantly higher among non-Hispanic white children aged 8 years (15.3 per 1,000) compared with non-Hispanic black children (13.1 per 1,000), and Hispanic (10.2 per 1,000) children aged 8 years. Estimated prevalence varied widely among the 11 ADDM Network sites, ranging from 8.2 per 1,000 children aged 8 years (in the area of the Maryland site where only health care records were reviewed) to 24.6 per 1,000 children aged 8 years (in New Jersey, where both education and health care records were reviewed). Estimated prevalence was higher in surveillance sites where education records and health records were reviewed compared with sites where health records only were reviewed (17.1 per 1,000 and 10.4 per 1,000 children aged 8 years, respectively; p<0.05). Among children identified with ASD by the ADDM Network, 82% had a previous ASD diagnosis or educational classification; this did not vary by sex or between non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black children. A lower percentage of Hispanic children (78%) had a previous ASD diagnosis or classification compared with non-Hispanic white children (82%) and with non-Hispanic black children (84%). The median age at earliest known comprehensive evaluation was 40 months, and 43% of children had received an earliest known comprehensive evaluation by age 36 months. The percentage of children with an earliest known comprehensive evaluation by age 36 months was similar for boys and girls, but was higher for non-Hispanic white children (45%) compared with non-Hispanic black children (40%) and Hispanic children (39%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Overall estimated ASD prevalence was 14.5 per 1,000 children aged 8 years in the ADDM Network sites in 2012. The higher estimated prevalence among sites that reviewed both education and health records suggests the role of special education systems in providing comprehensive evaluations and services to children with developmental disabilities. Disparities by race/ethnicity in estimated ASD prevalence, particularly for Hispanic children, as well as disparities in the age of earliest comprehensive evaluation and presence of a previous ASD diagnosis or classification, suggest that access to treatment and services might be lacking or delayed for some children.</p><p><strong>Public health action: </strong>The ADDM Network will continue to monitor the prevalence and characteristics of ASD among children aged 8 years living in selected sites across the United States. Recommendations from the ADDM Network include enhancing strategies to 1) lower the age of first evaluation of ASD by community providers in accordance with the Healthy People 2020 goal that children with ASD are evaluated by age 36 months and begin receiving community-based support and services by age 48 months; 2) reduce disparities by race/ethnicity in identified ASD prevalence, the age of first comprehensive evaluation, and presence of a previous ASD diagnosis or classification; and 3) assess the effect on ASD prevalence of the revised ASD diagnostic criteria published in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition.</p>","PeriodicalId":48549,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Surveillance Summaries","volume":"65 13","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":37.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6237390/pdf/","citationCount":"1665","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mmwr Surveillance Summaries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6513a1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1665

Abstract

Problem/condition: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

Period covered: 2012.

Description of system: The Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network is an active surveillance system that provides estimates of the prevalence and characteristics of ASD among children aged 8 years whose parents or guardians reside in 11 ADDM Network sites in the United States (Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah, and Wisconsin). Surveillance to determine ASD case status is conducted in two phases. The first phase consists of screening and abstracting comprehensive evaluations performed by professional service providers in the community. Data sources identified for record review are categorized as either 1) education source type, including developmental evaluations to determine eligibility for special education services or 2) health care source type, including diagnostic and developmental evaluations. The second phase involves the review of all abstracted evaluations by trained clinicians to determine ASD surveillance case status. A child meets the surveillance case definition for ASD if one or more comprehensive evaluations of that child completed by a qualified professional describes behaviors that are consistent with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision diagnostic criteria for any of the following conditions: autistic disorder, pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified (including atypical autism), or Asperger disorder. This report provides ASD prevalence estimates for children aged 8 years living in catchment areas of the ADDM Network sites in 2012, overall and stratified by sex, race/ethnicity, and the type of source records (education and health records versus health records only). In addition, this report describes the proportion of children with ASD with a score consistent with intellectual disability on a standardized intellectual ability test, the age at which the earliest known comprehensive evaluation was performed, the proportion of children with a previous ASD diagnosis, the specific type of ASD diagnosis, and any special education eligibility classification.

Results: For 2012, the combined estimated prevalence of ASD among the 11 ADDM Network sites was 14.5 per 1,000 (one in 69) children aged 8 years. Estimated prevalence was significantly higher among boys aged 8 years (23.4 per 1,000) than among girls aged 8 years (5.2 per 1,000). Estimated ASD prevalence was significantly higher among non-Hispanic white children aged 8 years (15.3 per 1,000) compared with non-Hispanic black children (13.1 per 1,000), and Hispanic (10.2 per 1,000) children aged 8 years. Estimated prevalence varied widely among the 11 ADDM Network sites, ranging from 8.2 per 1,000 children aged 8 years (in the area of the Maryland site where only health care records were reviewed) to 24.6 per 1,000 children aged 8 years (in New Jersey, where both education and health care records were reviewed). Estimated prevalence was higher in surveillance sites where education records and health records were reviewed compared with sites where health records only were reviewed (17.1 per 1,000 and 10.4 per 1,000 children aged 8 years, respectively; p<0.05). Among children identified with ASD by the ADDM Network, 82% had a previous ASD diagnosis or educational classification; this did not vary by sex or between non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black children. A lower percentage of Hispanic children (78%) had a previous ASD diagnosis or classification compared with non-Hispanic white children (82%) and with non-Hispanic black children (84%). The median age at earliest known comprehensive evaluation was 40 months, and 43% of children had received an earliest known comprehensive evaluation by age 36 months. The percentage of children with an earliest known comprehensive evaluation by age 36 months was similar for boys and girls, but was higher for non-Hispanic white children (45%) compared with non-Hispanic black children (40%) and Hispanic children (39%).

Interpretation: Overall estimated ASD prevalence was 14.5 per 1,000 children aged 8 years in the ADDM Network sites in 2012. The higher estimated prevalence among sites that reviewed both education and health records suggests the role of special education systems in providing comprehensive evaluations and services to children with developmental disabilities. Disparities by race/ethnicity in estimated ASD prevalence, particularly for Hispanic children, as well as disparities in the age of earliest comprehensive evaluation and presence of a previous ASD diagnosis or classification, suggest that access to treatment and services might be lacking or delayed for some children.

Public health action: The ADDM Network will continue to monitor the prevalence and characteristics of ASD among children aged 8 years living in selected sites across the United States. Recommendations from the ADDM Network include enhancing strategies to 1) lower the age of first evaluation of ASD by community providers in accordance with the Healthy People 2020 goal that children with ASD are evaluated by age 36 months and begin receiving community-based support and services by age 48 months; 2) reduce disparities by race/ethnicity in identified ASD prevalence, the age of first comprehensive evaluation, and presence of a previous ASD diagnosis or classification; and 3) assess the effect on ASD prevalence of the revised ASD diagnostic criteria published in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

8岁儿童自闭症谱系障碍的流行与特征——自闭症与发育障碍监测网络,美国,2012。
问题/状况:自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)。涵盖期间:2012年。系统描述:自闭症和发育障碍监测(ADDM)网络是一个主动监测系统,提供父母或监护人居住在美国11个ADDM网络站点(阿肯色州,亚利桑那州,科罗拉多州,佐治亚州,马里兰州,密苏里州,新泽西州,北卡罗来纳州,南卡罗来纳州,犹他州和威斯康星州)的8岁儿童中ASD患病率和特征的估计。确定ASD病例状态的监测分两个阶段进行。第一阶段包括筛选和提取由社区专业服务提供者进行的综合评估。确定用于记录审查的数据源分为以下两类:1)教育来源类型,包括用于确定特殊教育服务资格的发展评价;2)保健来源类型,包括诊断和发展评价。第二阶段包括审查所有由训练有素的临床医生进行的抽象评估,以确定ASD监测病例的状态。如果由合格的专业人员完成的对该儿童的一项或多项综合评估描述的行为符合精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版文本修订版的诊断标准,则该儿童符合ASD的监测病例定义:自闭症障碍,广泛性发育障碍-未另有说明(包括非典型自闭症)或阿斯伯格障碍。本报告提供了2012年生活在ADDM网络站点集水区的8岁儿童的ASD患病率估计,按性别、种族/民族和来源记录类型(教育和健康记录与仅健康记录)进行了总体和分层。此外,该报告还描述了在标准化智力能力测试中得分与智力残疾相符的自闭症儿童的比例,已知最早进行综合评估的年龄,以前诊断过自闭症儿童的比例,自闭症诊断的具体类型,以及任何特殊教育资格分类。结果:2012年,在11个ADDM网络站点中,ASD的综合估计患病率为每1000名8岁儿童中有14.5名(69人中有1名)。8岁男孩(每千人23.4人)的估计患病率明显高于8岁女孩(每千人5.2人)。8岁非西班牙裔白人儿童的ASD患病率(15.3 / 1000)明显高于非西班牙裔黑人儿童(13.1 / 1000)和8岁西班牙裔儿童(10.2 / 1000)。在11个ADDM网络站点中,估计的患病率差异很大,从每1,000名8岁儿童中有8.2人(在马里兰州站点,只审查了医疗记录)到每1,000名8岁儿童中有24.6人(在新泽西州,既审查了教育记录,也审查了医疗记录)。与仅审查健康记录的监测点相比,审查教育记录和健康记录的监测点的估计患病率更高(分别为17.1 / 1,000和10.4 / 1,000);解释:在2012年ADDM网络站点中,总体估计ASD患病率为每1000名8岁儿童中有14.5人。在审查了教育和健康记录的网站中,估计的患病率较高,这表明特殊教育系统在为发育障碍儿童提供全面评估和服务方面的作用。估计ASD患病率的种族/民族差异,特别是西班牙裔儿童,以及最早进行全面评估的年龄差异和先前ASD诊断或分类的存在,表明一些儿童可能缺乏或延迟获得治疗和服务。公共卫生行动:ADDM网络将继续监测生活在美国选定地点的8岁儿童中自闭症谱系障碍的患病率和特征。来自ADDM网络的建议包括加强以下策略:1)降低社区提供者首次评估ASD的年龄,以符合健康人2020目标,即ASD儿童在36个月大时进行评估,并在48个月大时开始接受社区支持和服务;2)减少种族/民族在已确诊的ASD患病率、首次综合评估的年龄、既往ASD诊断或分类存在方面的差异;3)评估《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版修订后的ASD诊断标准对ASD患病率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mmwr Surveillance Summaries
Mmwr Surveillance Summaries PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
60.50
自引率
1.20%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Series, produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is commonly referred to as "the voice of CDC." Serving as the primary outlet for timely, reliable, authoritative, accurate, objective, and practical public health information and recommendations, the MMWR is a crucial publication. Its readership primarily includes physicians, nurses, public health practitioners, epidemiologists, scientists, researchers, educators, and laboratorians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信