Comparison of Meat Quality Characteristics of Wet- and Dry-aging Pork Belly and Shoulder Blade.

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Young-Hwa Hwang, Nahar Sabikun, Ishamri Ismail, Seon-Tea Joo
{"title":"Comparison of Meat Quality Characteristics of Wet- and Dry-aging Pork Belly and Shoulder Blade.","authors":"Young-Hwa Hwang,&nbsp;Nahar Sabikun,&nbsp;Ishamri Ismail,&nbsp;Seon-Tea Joo","doi":"10.5851/kosfa.2018.e27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The physicochemical characteristics and oxidative stability of wet-aged and dry-aged pork cuts were investigated at different aging periods (1, 7, 14 and 21 d). Samples were assigned into four groups in terms of shoulder blade-wet aging (SW), shoulder blade-dry aging (SD), belly-wet aging (BW), and belly-dry aging (BD). SD showed significantly higher pH at 21 d of aging than the other samples. Wet-aged cuts had significantly higher released water (RW) %, lightness (L*) and shear force compared to the dry-aged meats. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis showed greater degradation of proteins for dry-aged cuts than the wet-aged cuts. At the end of aging, wet-aged cuts showed significantly lower thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) value than the dry-aged samples, indicating higher oxidative stability for wet-aged pork cuts. However, dry-aging led to higher degradation of proteins resulting in increased water-holding capacity (WHC) and decreased shear force value.</p>","PeriodicalId":17915,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/15/47/kosfa-38-5-950.PMC6238040.pdf","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2018.e27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The physicochemical characteristics and oxidative stability of wet-aged and dry-aged pork cuts were investigated at different aging periods (1, 7, 14 and 21 d). Samples were assigned into four groups in terms of shoulder blade-wet aging (SW), shoulder blade-dry aging (SD), belly-wet aging (BW), and belly-dry aging (BD). SD showed significantly higher pH at 21 d of aging than the other samples. Wet-aged cuts had significantly higher released water (RW) %, lightness (L*) and shear force compared to the dry-aged meats. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis showed greater degradation of proteins for dry-aged cuts than the wet-aged cuts. At the end of aging, wet-aged cuts showed significantly lower thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) value than the dry-aged samples, indicating higher oxidative stability for wet-aged pork cuts. However, dry-aging led to higher degradation of proteins resulting in increased water-holding capacity (WHC) and decreased shear force value.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

湿、干陈化五花肉和肩胛骨肉质特性的比较。
研究湿法和干法熟成猪肉块在1、7、14和21 d的理化特性和氧化稳定性,并将样品按肩胛骨湿法熟成(SW)、肩胛骨干法熟成(SD)、腹部湿法熟成(BW)和腹部干法熟成(BD) 4组进行分组。陈化21 d时,SD的pH值明显高于其他样品。湿法熟化肉片的释放水分(RW) %、轻度(L*)和剪切力均显著高于干法熟化肉片。十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)分析表明,干老化刀口的蛋白质降解程度高于湿老化刀口。在陈化结束时,湿法陈化猪肉块的硫代巴比妥酸反应物质(TBARS)值明显低于干法陈化猪肉块,表明湿法陈化猪肉块具有更高的氧化稳定性。然而,干老化导致蛋白质的高降解,导致水保持能力(WHC)增加,剪切力值降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.22
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信